Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 786 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
27,823
Reaction Score
38,701


and just like that…


We’re not even in the conversation.

“Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark has even focused on basketball, which he views as undervalued. A Big 12 with basketball powers that include Arizona, Kansas, Baylor, UNC, Duke, Virginia, Louisville and so on would easily be the best in the country.”
 
Joined
May 27, 2014
Messages
3,342
Reaction Score
16,968
Well it’s already the G7. Plus it wouldn’t change their fate much by adding UConn instead.
UConn is the only brand in the list you named. We all know our value is minimal but it’s more than Memphis and Tulane. SMU got in because they’re playing for free essentially.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
27,823
Reaction Score
38,701
UConn is the only brand in the list you named. We all know our value is minimal but it’s more than Memphis and Tulane. SMU got in because they’re playing for free essentially.

What’s our football value?
 

Fishy

Elite Premium Poster
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
18,278
Reaction Score
133,665
If the GOC can truly be cracked, the end result is likely UNC, UVa and GaTech in the Big Ten - perhaps the SEC might be interested in footholds in NC and Virginia, but the Big 12 would take everything it could get from the ACC. I think FSU overestimates itself.

Basketball guy Yormark would probably trip over himself to get Duke hoops.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
2,321
Reaction Score
5,622
For the skeptics who think UConn has no chance of joining the ACC, this will be a different conference once FSU and Clemson depart. We have a chance if we don't pull the same kind of mistake we did a dozen years ago.
 
Joined
Aug 18, 2022
Messages
609
Reaction Score
4,640
We’re not even in the conversation.

“Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark has even focused on basketball, which he views as undervalued. A Big 12 with basketball powers that include Arizona, Kansas, Baylor, UNC, Duke, Virginia, Louisville and so on would easily be the best in the country.”
Yeah the basketball power that is Louisville, nice call.
 
Joined
May 27, 2014
Messages
3,342
Reaction Score
16,968
What’s our football value?
Not sure tulanes is much more just because they’ve been decent for a year or two. If ACC loses FSU/Clemson/UNC/UVa/Miami it’s a nothing conference. Maybe a Big East merger but it’s not worth a thing.
 
Joined
Nov 12, 2021
Messages
206
Reaction Score
1,957
Hard pass on joining a conference called the new ACC which is mostly the old AAC. It's not worth us damaging the basketball brand to chase football in a glorified G5 league. As painful as it is for some to hear, UConn as an institutional whole is better off in a thriving Big East with independent football than it would be in a watered down ACC. Read Mike Anthony's piece today about the demand for basketball tickets and that will tell you most of what you need to know here.
 

shizzle787

King Shizzle DCCLXXXVII of the Cesspool
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
12,255
Reaction Score
19,647

FSU joining the Big 12 makes no sense. The ACC schools make more than the Big 12 schools, and the better brands are in the ACC.
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
2,587
Reaction Score
5,184
FSU joining the Big 12 makes no sense. The ACC schools make more than the Big 12 schools, and the better brands are in the ACC.
I think the Big 12 will survive as the P3 and the addition of FSU will strengthen them even more. Maybe they will add Clemson as well and eventually the other ACC schools listed in a previous post above. And yes, Louisville will survive. The absolute tragedy here was the Big 12 train leaving UConn at the station. There is no longer anywhere to go but down. Only Wake and BC will be left, like OSU and WSU are in the former PAC 12.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
93,116
Reaction Score
364,874
From yesterday but timely discussion:



-> As for Kelly’s proposed 64-team football conference — that sounds neat and tidy, but what incentive do the SEC and Big Ten have to join forces with the less-valued ACC and Big 12? “Every year, we (would) play seven games against the West Coast teams, and then we play the East — Syracuse, Boston College, Pitt, West Virginia, Virginia. Then the next year you play the South, while you still play your seven (West Coast) teams.” That’s . . . not an attractive schedule. Fox is paying you guys $65 million a year to play Ohio State and Penn State, not Syracuse and Boston College.

As I’ve written every couple of months for the past five years, when conference consolidation comes, the magic cutline won’t be 64; it will be 32 or less. It will be the very top brands that drive the overwhelming majority of the television value banding together. Especially once the courts inevitably rule that schools must share their revenue with the athletes and/or pay them a salary. Ohio State, with its $250 million in annual athletics revenue, can afford to cut those checks without breaking a sweat. Maryland, whose overall budget is less than half that ($114 million), would have a much tougher time of it. <-
 

Drew

Its a post, about nothing!
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
7,976
Reaction Score
29,147
From yesterday but timely discussion:

https://twitter.com/TheAthleticCFB/status/1737503374222696463?s=20

-> As for Kelly’s proposed 64-team football conference — that sounds neat and tidy, but what incentive do the SEC and Big Ten have to join forces with the less-valued ACC and Big 12? “Every year, we (would) play seven games against the West Coast teams, and then we play the East — Syracuse, Boston College, Pitt, West Virginia, Virginia. Then the next year you play the South, while you still play your seven (West Coast) teams.” That’s . . . not an attractive schedule. Fox is paying you guys $65 million a year to play Ohio State and Penn State, not Syracuse and Boston College.

As I’ve written every couple of months for the past five years, when conference consolidation comes, the magic cutline won’t be 64; it will be 32 or less. It will be the very top brands that drive the overwhelming majority of the television value banding together. Especially once the courts inevitably rule that schools must share their revenue with the athletes and/or pay them a salary. Ohio State, with its $250 million in annual athletics revenue, can afford to cut those checks without breaking a sweat. Maryland, whose overall budget is less than half that ($114 million), would have a much tougher time of it. <-
I love how the writer knows that Maryland is screwed with an athletics budget of $114M but Shizzle still thinks teams like Saint Louis and DePaul are going to be able to play in this new world with budgets 1/4 of that
 

shizzle787

King Shizzle DCCLXXXVII of the Cesspool
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
12,255
Reaction Score
19,647
I think the Big 12 will survive as the P3 and the addition of FSU will strengthen them even more. Maybe they will add Clemson as well and eventually the other ACC schools listed in a previous post above. And yes, Louisville will survive. The absolute tragedy here was the Big 12 train leaving UConn at the station. There is no longer anywhere to go but down. Only Wake and BC will be left, like OSU and WSU are in the former PAC 12.
Florida State is trying to make more revenue, not less. The Big 12 is a step back revenue-wise.
 

shizzle787

King Shizzle DCCLXXXVII of the Cesspool
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
12,255
Reaction Score
19,647
I love how the writer knows that Maryland is screwed with an athletics budget of $114M but Shizzle still thinks teams like Saint Louis and DePaul are going to be able to play in this new world with budgets 1/4 of that
They are going to pay their athletes (after they get to the minimum number of sports) as close to minimum wage as possible. They will afford it. Will they compete? No. Will they try? Yes.
 

Online statistics

Members online
346
Guests online
2,104
Total visitors
2,450

Forum statistics

Threads
160,766
Messages
4,237,272
Members
10,093
Latest member
Verna


.
Top Bottom