98Uconn
NL1MF
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2012
- Messages
- 238
- Reaction Score
- 1,942
No, I should not despise Utah for likely getting our life raft off of the island of being financially uncompetitive in a few years?No
No, I should not despise Utah for likely getting our life raft off of the island of being financially uncompetitive in a few years?No
I have that same feeling.Call me crazy, but I still believe this is all postering. My gut tells me the pac 9 really want to stay together.
Posturing for who? That doesn't really make any sense.Call me crazy, but I still believe this is all postering. My gut tells me the pac 9 really want to stay together.
It makes plenty of sense. By threatening to disband, it’s forcing Apple to come in w a higher bid. Oregon and Washington will have a hard time leaving the “states” behind. Stanford and cal and maybe Utah don’t have a home. ASU really doesn’t want to go to big 12. What doesn’t make sense?Posturing for who? That doesn't really make any sense.
Why would apple come in with a higher bid on a property that may cease to exist?It makes plenty of sense. By threatening to disband, it’s forcing Apple to come in w a higher bid.
I don't think Apple is going to get into a bidding war with FOX/NBC over Oregon/UWIt makes plenty of sense. By threatening to disband, it’s forcing Apple to come in w a higher bid.
There are certainly some flaws in our current system but overall I think you can get a great education if you put in the time and effort.Spending hasn't increased beyond inflation. Expenditures go up in normal increments. Tuition has far surpassed inflation because of the huge drops in state subsidy. In fact, in California, you can compare the drop in subsidy per student to the rise in tuition almost dollar for dollar.
Universities aren't advertising this but education is absolutely eroding in this country. This is a thing that is almost universally acknowledged by people inside universities.
SMH.Why would apple come in with a higher bid on a property that may cease to exist?
So Apple is going to spend time and money building a relationship with a brand that is all but publicly exclaiming that many of its members want to jump ship? I don't see how that is good for the PAC.SMH.
Apple clearly wants to get into live sports. Fox clearly doesn’t want Apple to join. That’s what is going here. Now we get to see how much apple values college football.
Seems more likely Apple will give this crew until the middle of next week to firm up as a conf or walk themselves. Does Apple really need this PAC toy thingy?So Apple is going to spend time and money building a relationship with a brand that is all but publicly exclaiming that many of its members want to jump ship? I don't see how that is good for the PAC.
That’s what you’re not getting. Most don’t want to jump ship. They want a better deal.So Apple is going to spend time and money building a relationship with a brand that is all but publicly exclaiming that many of its members want to jump ship? I don't see how that is good for the PAC.
If they want to get into college football they do. If they are planning some sort of joint venture w espn they do. There are many reasons why Apple is in this.Seems more likely Apple will give this crew until the middle of next week to firm up as a conf or walk themselves. Does Apple really need this PAC toy thingy?
How does threatening to break the toy you want to sell get you more money???That’s what you’re not getting. Most don’t want to jump ship. They want a better deal.
It’s called leverage. By threatening all to leave, they are trying to manufacture some.How does threatening to break the toy you want to sell get you more money???