- Joined
- Sep 22, 2011
- Messages
- 2,162
- Reaction Score
- 11,343
The most important sport at uconn is basketball… we are very successful now in the big east… thats a given… its not if we join the big I don’t see why they wouldn’t be successful in big 12.
The most important sport at uconn is basketball… we are very successful now in the big east… thats a given… its not if we join the big I don’t see why they wouldn’t be successful in big 12.
I like the guy who says "I don't know anything about sports". That was his entire contribution to the discussion.The guy on the right on that panel gets and understands it. He should be urged to talk more.
Lowering expectations…Good grief, that announcement is full of qualifiers and assumptions that it really says nothing of any substance. To me that indicates that it won't be anything to cheer about. Coming from WSU, there is a lot of wishful thinking in that release.
So you think without CU and/or AZ they pause expansion for now?If that's true, and not wishful thinking on the part of WSU, nobody is leaving the PAC 12 this year. Under this scenario, probably the only way UConn would get an invite this year is if the Big 12 was able to grab SDSU before the end of the month.
Really, I didn't know Arizona was a Northeastern state. His brother grew up in the northeast, so your reasoning is off...I doubt Hurley stays if we join the big 12…we will be a northeastern school recruiting in a southern league
I don't see how the B12 can't grab SDSU. It seems like the B12 is the better long term home and the SDSU couldn't risk missing out on a B12 invite just to wait around for the PAC offer and payout numbers.So you think without CU and/or AZ they pause expansion for now?
Even if this is the case, and it is highly likely it will be if by some miracle PAC-12 ended up with a deal similar to B12, I still believe it would be crazy for the B12 not to expand.If that's true, and not wishful thinking on the part of WSU, nobody is leaving the PAC 12 this year. Under this scenario, probably the only way UConn would get an invite this year is if the Big 12 was able to grab SDSU before the end of the month.
Aw, the bargaining stage in playEven if this is the case, and it is highly likely it will be if by some miracle PAC-12 ended up with a deal similar to B12, I still believe it would be crazy for the B12 not to expand.
For one, just being 12 is dangerous. B12 should still grab UConn and one of the Western schools. They can also just add UConn to make it 13. There is strength in numbers, and they should expand especially if TV partners willing to pay the same share for UConn as current schools.
Absent his self-disclosed honesty, which Boneyard contributor?I like the guy who says "I don't know anything about sports". That was his entire contribution to the discussion.
It was a channel 8 panel with four panelists. Each one gave their take on expansion. When the discussion leader asked one of the four for his opinion he said something like "I told you before I don't know anything about sports." That was it and then they moved on to someone else.Absent his self-disclosed honesty, which Boneyard contributor?
Whoosh, no kidding.It was a channel 8 panel with four panelists. Each one gave their take on expansion. When the discussion leader asked one of the four for his opinion he said something like "I told you before I don't know anything about sports." That was it and then they moved on to someone else.
SDSU gets its student body overwhelmingly from CA and Pac 12 territory, and will continue to. There is a huge, huge benefit in terms of recruiting students by playing in the Pac and not the Big XII regardless of athletic department cash. They would take less money to join the Pac. However, if they think the Pac will be dissolving in a few years anyway, that would change the equation.I don't see how the B12 can't grab SDSU. It seems like the B12 is the better long term home and the SDSU couldn't risk missing out on a B12 invite just to wait around for the PAC offer and payout numbers.
SDSU gets its student body overwhelmingly from CA and Pac 12 territory, and will continue to. There is a huge, huge benefit in terms of recruiting students by playing in the Pac and not the Big XII regardless of athletic department cash. They would take less money to join the Pac. However, if they think the Pac will be dissolving in a few years anyway, that would change the equation.
That makes sense, but passing up a B12 offer in hopes of a good offer from the PAC down the road seems kind of crazy. I would think the kids being recruited to SDSU would be happy to play in the B12, just like UConn recruits would.SDSU gets its student body overwhelmingly from CA and Pac 12 territory, and will continue to. There is a huge, huge benefit in terms of recruiting students by playing in the Pac and not the Big XII regardless of athletic department cash. They would take less money to join the Pac. However, if they think the Pac will be dissolving in a few years anyway, that would change the equation.
I didn't talk about passing up a bird in the hand for two in the bush. Just that if it has a choice, SDSU would for reasons having nothing to do with athletics far prefer to be in the Pac.That makes sense, but passing up a B12 offer in hopes of a good offer from the PAC down the road seems kind of crazy. I would think the kids being recruited to SDSU would be happy to play in the B12, just like UConn recruits would.
Why does anything else matter for an athletic conference/association? I don't really understand this logic. Fox and ESPN aren't going to pay an athletic conference more money because of how big its members' libraries are or how many PhDs it cranks out.I didn't talk about passing up a bird in the hand for two in the bush. Just that if it has a choice, SDSU would for reasons having nothing to do with athletics far prefer to be in the Pac.
I didn't talk about passing up a bird in the hand for two in the bush. Just that if it has a choice, SDSU would for reasons having nothing to do with athletics far prefer to be in the Pac.
What do you think is more important to a school, academics or athletics?Why does anything else matter for an athletic conference/association? I don't really understand this logic. Fox and ESPN aren't going to pay an athletic conference more money because of how big its members' libraries are or how many PhDs it cranks out.
The guy on the right is Stewart McKinney, former US rep from CT, and he gets it totally. The woman to his right (viewers' left), is Liz Kantrowiscz and she is not buying it saying that there isn't a big enough base of support for bigtime UConn football. She is putting up all the timeworn arguments for staying in the NBE which to my mind are rebuttable one by one.The guy on the right on that panel gets and understands it. He should be urged to talk more.
Stewart McKinney died of AIDS 40 years ago.The guy on the right is Stewart McKinney, former US rep from CT, and he gets it totally. The woman to his right (viewers' left), is Liz Kantrowiscz and she is not buying it saying that there isn't a big enough base of support for bigtime UConn football. She is putting up all the timeworn arguments for staying in the NBE which to my mind are rebuttable one by one.