Chin Diesel
Power of Love
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 33,776
- Reaction Score
- 107,333
I understand what you’re saying, but I think it’s somewhat problematic. I think the goal is to get an optimally sized conference that allows you to fill the time slots in your media deal. If you start bringing in “associate members“ or contracting to fill those time slots with programs outside of your conference there will be dissent due to lost visibility. We are already hearing a little bit of blowback from big 10 members who take the very reasonable position that they don’t want to add anyone who dilutes value. Diluting visibility would be a similar concern.
To me, the flaw in the mega-conference theory is that at some point when a conference gets large enough, it stops feeling like a conference. I am reminded of the line from The Incredibles “when everyone is super, no one is.“ At some point when you get large enough, there’s stops being a cachet and stops having a shared sense of purpose.
It will be more for basketball and other Olympic sports where you need to do more regional scheduling.
IMO you will see way more BE and B1G scheduling going forward than BE and ACC or SEC.
The mega conferences will each have their own mini tournaments leading in to a national championship between B1G aligned schools and SEC aligned schools. And yes those mini tourneys will be rigged to give the B1G and SEC schools best chance of winning. This isn't a merger, it's an acquisition. Either you get aligned with B1G or SEC or you perish.