Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 385 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

Joined
Aug 2, 2016
Messages
4,728
Reaction Score
60,044
Anything good here?



Gavitt Games in negotiation for 2023. Why one year? Who knows. My speculation: May be signaling that this is ending once new contract for B10 starts or waiting to accommodate new expansion adds once they join.

Also brings up Gonzaga as an expansion candidate to the BE. Says it isn't imminent or anything but just brings it up as something to consider.
 

Chin Diesel

Power of Love
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
33,776
Reaction Score
107,333
With the two California teams in the B1G, I wonder if one of the two will always be away while the other is home and vice versa so that the B1G will always have a late night game for the west coast audience, while giving the other a game in one of the eastern time slots.

Now imagine having four Cali schools in Pacific Time Zone. Two games out there each weekend. And don't discount FOX having a much larger California presence than ESPN, NBC, CBS, etc.
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
947
Reaction Score
2,159
You’ll forgive me if I have a healthy skepticism about the ESPN’s disinterested generosity. Look for this offer to be low with the idea that the big 12 will give up future speculative value for immediate certainty.

On the other hand, it’s also possible that ESPN has decided to make the big 12 the winner of the game of survivor that’s going on between eight and the Pac 12 much like it did when it chose the ACC over the Big East when those two conferences were looking to position themselves.
I think ESPN is playing both sides against the middle negotiating with both the B12 & PAC at the same time.

Whichever conference is willing to take the lowball offer first will likely be the survivor and ESPN can move the schools around as they want between them once the winner is crowned
 

Exit 4

This space for rent
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
10,660
Reaction Score
40,139
Clearly the B1G and Big East are going to merge for Olympic Sports purposes. That would put the B1G far above the SEC. Winning.
Well- I do think that in the decade to come these media companies will be looking to make these conferences have a footprint that hits all four corners of the map so that they can legitimize paying oodles and avoid having what is deemed a regional product. It’s remote at this moment, but I could see each of the power 2, 3 or 4 conf adopting a G5 to have a combined media deal. A Big brother - little brother media package. More content and more opportunities to help Olympics. I don’t see the power conf just handing money out and opening doors- instead I just see it as combo package to fill in gaps. Right now the BiG could literally toss CUSA or the FunBelt some nickels and say hey- we are putting you on BTN as gap filler and also we’ll do some BB stuff together.

What happens to BTN if the FunBelt is added? Seems like BTN adds a lot of southern eye balls.
 

dayooper

It's what I do. I drink and I know things.
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
1,734
Reaction Score
4,565
Clearly the B1G and Big East are going to merge for Olympic Sports purposes. That would put the B1G far above the SEC. Winning.

That is a really interesting idea. Maybe not merge, but scheduling contracts and series (Big10/Big East Challenge). Puts the Big10 in the NE and a stronger position in the Mid-Atlantic areas.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
502
Reaction Score
1,938
36-40 programs will breakaway. 18-20 south (SEC) and 18-20 north (BiG). Professional franchises each within a conference. That will be college football and, eventually college basketball. NFL and NBA light. Holds no appeal to me, but evidently the brain trusts see a way to make a lot more money.

Honestly, I have no direct insight into this, but I have to believe this is where its all going.
I hear what you’re saying and I don’t find it appealing either.
But the NFL needs more than 40 teams for a “minor league” develop its talent pool. And if non B1G-SEC universities are going to keep losing money in football then why would they invest more into it? Especially considering ongoing risk of concussion lawsuits.
The NBA doesn’t really on a farm league. More and more they draft high school or foreign players. How many college grads have been first round draft picks in the last five years?
I with you. I really don’t like where this is going.
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
5,511
Reaction Score
23,046
Well- I do think that in the decade to come these media companies will be looking to make these conferences have a footprint that hits all four corners of the map so that they can legitimize paying oodles and avoid having what is deemed a regional product. It’s remote at this moment, but I could see each of the power 2, 3 or 4 conf adopting a G5 to have a combined media deal. A Big brother - little brother media package. More content and more opportunities to help Olympics. I don’t see the power conf just handing money out and opening doors- instead I just see it as combo package to fill in gaps. Right now the BiG could literally toss CUSA or the FunBelt some nickels and say hey- we are putting you on BTN as gap filler and also we’ll do some BB stuff together.

What happens to BTN if the FunBelt is added? Seems like BTN adds a lot of southern eye balls.
College sports are moving to conference networks and streaming. When the cable bundle ends or becomes less relevant in the future, conference networks will be looking for content and brands to attract customers to buy their channel. It would not surprise me if the BTN and SECN look towards other conference for content.

In the short term, ironically, it would make the most sense for the ACCN to partner with the Big East for content as it would get the ACCN with home state pricing in Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, DC/Maryland, Philadelphia, Chicago, Ohio, Milwaukee,...
 
Joined
Aug 4, 2016
Messages
1,489
Reaction Score
2,043
In the short term, ironically, it would make the most sense for the ACCN to partner with the Big East for content as it would get the ACCN with home state pricing in Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, DC/Maryland, Philadelphia, Chicago, Ohio, Milwaukee,...
Xavier isn't getting the ACCN in Ohio. Even Cincinnati couldn't do that. Ohio is all Ohio State. Fans of the other schools all went to school there, and even those fans are often double fans - fans of their home school and fans of Ohio State.
 

Chin Diesel

Power of Love
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
33,776
Reaction Score
107,333
College sports are moving to conference networks and streaming. When the cable bundle ends or becomes less relevant in the future, conference networks will be looking for content and brands to attract customers to buy their channel. It would not surprise me if the BTN and SECN look towards other conference for content.

In the short term, ironically, it would make the most sense for the ACCN to partner with the Big East for content as it would get the ACCN with home state pricing in Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, DC/Maryland, Philadelphia, Chicago, Ohio, Milwaukee,...

I've been saying this for a while. B1G and SEC are going to get other conferences to align with their media deals so those services have content beyond B1G and SEC. It also allows for easier non-conference scheduling.

Used to be conference prestige was linked to the media who broadcast conference games. So, it was a big deal to say games were on CBS or ESPN.

Now, media outlets want to use conferences to bolster their service. So, FOX can say they are a B1G content provider. ESPN can say they are an SEC content provider.

In terms of brand power the conference is now more prestigious than the media outlets.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,976
Reaction Score
225,018
I've been saying this for a while. B1G and SEC are going to get other conferences to align with their media deals so those services have content beyond B1G and SEC. It also allows for easier non-conference scheduling.

Used to be conference prestige was linked to the media who broadcast conference games. So, it was a big deal to say games were on CBS or ESPN.

Now, media outlets want to use conferences to bolster their service. So, FOX can say they are a B1G content provider. ESPN can say they are an SEC content provider.

In terms of brand power the conference is now more prestigious than the media outlets.
I understand what you’re saying, but I think it’s somewhat problematic. I think the goal is to get an optimally sized conference that allows you to fill the time slots in your media deal. If you start bringing in “associate members“ or contracting to fill those time slots with programs outside of your conference there will be dissent due to lost visibility. We are already hearing a little bit of blowback from big 10 members who take the very reasonable position that they don’t want to add anyone who dilutes value. Diluting visibility would be a similar concern.

To me, the flaw in the mega-conference theory is that at some point when a conference gets large enough, it stops feeling like a conference. I am reminded of the line from The Incredibles “when everyone is super, no one is.“ At some point when you get large enough, there’s stops being a cachet and stops having a shared sense of purpose.
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
2,305
Reaction Score
6,827
I understand what you’re saying, but I think it’s somewhat problematic. I think the goal is to get an optimally sized conference that allows you to fill the time slots in your media deal. If you start bringing in “associate members“ or contracting to fill those time slots with programs outside of your conference there will be dissent due to lost visibility. We are already hearing a little bit of blowback from big 10 members who take the very reasonable position that they don’t want to add anyone who dilutes value. Diluting visibility would be a similar concern.

To me, the flaw in the mega-conference theory is that at some point when a conference gets large enough, it stops feeling like a conference. I am reminded of the line from The Incredibles “when everyone is super, no one is.“ At some point when you get large enough, there’s stops being a cachet and stops having a shared sense of purpose.
I have said many times this grand experiment will fail. Just look at business history. Yes, these schools will make a boatload of money and perhaps that is all that matters. But in the end the best case is a return to smaller regional conferences and worst case the destruction of college Athletics. Good legacy for these folks
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,976
Reaction Score
225,018
I have said many times this grand experiment will fail. Just look at business history. Yes, these schools will make a boatload of money and perhaps that is all that matters. But in the end the best case is a return to smaller regional conferences and worst case the destruction of college Athletics. Good legacy for these folks
I’m not so sure it would fail, and if it ultimately does it will be after making people billions of dollars. Is that a failure? I don’t know.

Nothing last forever and this current drift towards make a conferences won’t either. I suspect, though, whatever comes out of it those who are sitting at the big boy table now may well have a big enough lead in facilities and tradition that they are well positioned for whatever comes next.
 

dayooper

It's what I do. I drink and I know things.
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
1,734
Reaction Score
4,565
I have said many times this grand experiment will fail. Just look at business history. Yes, these schools will make a boatload of money and perhaps that is all that matters. But in the end the best case is a return to smaller regional conferences and worst case the destruction of college Athletics. Good legacy for these folks

My personal opinion is it’s about consolidating the major players and making those at the table more visible. We have seen this happen before when the divisions were set up and again when D1 football was split. It’s taking the top brands and their Tagalongs (you know who they are) and elevating them above the rest. Once you get the P2 set, you can break apart the conferences into divisions (like the NFL) and find a way to get a little parity between the big dogs. Will it work? Don’t know, but that’s the way life is nowadays, the powerful doing what they can to protect and expand what they have.
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
2,305
Reaction Score
6,827
My personal opinion is it’s about consolidating the major players and making those at the table more visible. We have seen this happen before when the divisions were set up and again when D1 football was split. It’s taking the top brands and their Tagalongs (you know who they are) and elevating them above the rest. Once you get the P2 set, you can break apart the conferences into divisions (like the NFL) and find a way to get a little parity between the big dogs. Will it work? Don’t know, but that’s the way life is nowadays, the powerful doing what they can to protect and expand what they have.
The problem is markets and where people turn after they refuse to buy into the streaming services. Big boy fans such as you might pay for Iowa/Rutgers, but many of us will have nothing to do with the cartel and will find other interests in life to spend our time and money on best of luck to your AOL/Time Warner experiment
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2014
Messages
18,070
Reaction Score
25,004
Clemson, Utah, Baylor, Oregon, Okie State, NC State, Miami (Fla), Pitt, Wake, Cinci, Houston, BYU, Fresno State, UCF, Kansas State, UNC, Boise State, Air Force, App State, SDSU, Utah State

Who are 21 programs who finished ranked or ORV in 2021 which will be relegated per B1G and SEC brass. Ridiculous.
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
7,638
Reaction Score
29,108
Clemson, Utah, Baylor, Oregon, Okie State, NC State, Miami (Fla), Pitt, Wake, Cinci, Houston, BYU, Fresno State, UCF, Kansas State, UNC, Boise State, Air Force, App State, SDSU, Utah State

Who are 21 programs who finished ranked or ORV in 2021 which will be relegated per B1G and SEC brass. Ridiculous.
Not all of them will be relegated. The P2 will pick off the most valuable names on that list. If they want to expand it's going to have to be from the Pac12, Big XII, and ACC because it doesn't appear that they're interested in G-5/mid-major schools. There will be schools that get screwed of course, but we know all about that don't we?
 

Online statistics

Members online
286
Guests online
3,699
Total visitors
3,985

Forum statistics

Threads
161,639
Messages
4,272,282
Members
10,114
Latest member
Jsmoove1121


.
..
Top Bottom