Sure. If that makes you sleep better at night. Tara has stated in the past that the admissible pool of top 100 recruits is rarely more than 10 per year, and in some years has been closer to 5.
And BTW: 1 out of every 7 students at Stanford is a varsity athlete, so by your math that's 14.2% of the school that's crowding into the bottom 10%. Stanford students even excel at bending the laws of math, apparently!
I'm stoked about them. And if 1 or more are injured or in foul trouble, I am greedy and want more. Nanji is a good prospect.
Sure. If that makes you sleep better at night. Tara has stated in the past that the admissible pool of top 100 recruits is rarely more than 10 per year, and in some years has been closer to 5.
And BTW: 1 out of every 7 students at Stanford is a varsity athlete, so by your math that's 14.2% of the school that's crowding into the bottom 10%. Stanford students even excel at bending the laws of math, apparently!
Nnagi's brother was a freshman at Arizona last season and announced he was entering the NBA draft this spring. Not exactly a decision for education.

If she wants to play with her former teammate, win a bunch of championships, and be wnba ready like say Napheesa Collier and other Lynx/UConn players who are in her backyard then maybe just 20ish minutes a game is a small sacrifice.I understand Nnaji is a good player, I have been singing her praises for years at this point. You just have to look at it from her perspective though. Why would she go to a school like UConn and have to beat out the #1 ranked big in 2021 class, the #2 overall player in the 2022 class, and the #1 overall ranked Canadien in the 2020 class to get minutes, when she can go somewhere else and start from Day 1?
Teaching Chemistry & Physics at the Dual Credit level for many years has taught me that not all siblings are motivated to the same level in the classroom. I have found the young women tend to be towards the perfectionist side compared to the young men's "good enough" even when the young women may arguably be as good or better athletes. It is always best to treat each person as an individual and give ample positive encouragement!Nnagi's brother was a freshman at Arizona last season and announced he was entering the NBA draft this spring. Not exactly a decision for education.
I fully understand your point. I, for one, am greedy at this point for outstanding "BIGS" who can run the court and play excellent defense, particularly when they can both block shots and get steals!!!I understand Nnaji is a good player, I have been singing her praises for years at this point. You just have to look at it from her perspective though. Why would she go to a school like UConn and have to beat out the #1 ranked big in 2021 class, the #2 overall player in the 2022 class, and the #1 overall ranked Canadien in the 2020 class to get minutes, when she can go somewhere else and start from Day 1?
She has alot of growing and maturing to do as all freshman do (except Boston?? ). I really wish everyone would let her grow into her (Generational Player) role at whatever pace will make her the best when she graduates UConn
I don't agree with your tone. I hope the vast majority don't agree with it as well.
And a contributing factor to the different level of academic focus in this case COULD be that NBA salaries are over 150X higher than WNBA salaries (NBA supermax level is 177X the WNBA max of $215,000). Just sayin’...Teaching Chemistry & Physics at the Dual Credit level for many years has taught me that not all siblings are motivated to the same level in the classroom. I have found the young women tend to be towards the perfectionist side compared to the young men's "good enough" even when the young women may arguably be as good or better athletes. It is always best to treat each person as an individual and give ample positive encouragement!
And a contributing factor to the different level of academic focus in this case COULD be that NBA salaries are over 150X higher than WNBA salaries (NBA supermax level is 177X the WNBA max of $215,000). Just sayin’...
You might need counseling or maybe a good cardiologist...I saw this on instagram.
My heart will literally be shattered if Fudd goes anywhere else but UConn.

Define "passed." Once a student has completed a year at Stanford they are welcome to return to complete their degree at any time. In Tiger's case, his success on the links rendered that guarantee unnecessary. But imagine he had a career-ending injury at 23 - can't imagine he wouldn't have wanted to come back and get it. And funny you should pick that example: Woods said in an interview a few years ago that not staying at Stanford one more year and completing his degree was his "only regret." Given the other actions he taken that one might reasonably think he should regret, that's quite a powerful statement, IMHO.As an educator you would naturally place education high on your list but even Tiger Woods passed on a Stanford degree to go pro.
How about Euro salaries? Sure, the NBA is another universe but to a 21 year old a half million a year in income has to be very tempting.
One more year at Stanford for Woods would have made 3. Could he have gotten a degree in 3 years? I didn't see any mention of getting his degree.Define "passed." Once a student has completed a year at Stanford they are welcome to return to complete their degree at any time. In Tiger's case, his success on the links rendered that guarantee unnecessary. But imagine he had a career-ending injury at 23 - can't imagine he wouldn't have wanted to come back and get it. And funny you should pick that example: Woods said in an interview a few years ago that not staying at Stanford one more year and completing his degree was his "only regret." Given the other actions he taken that one might reasonably think he should regret, that's quite a powerful statement, IMHO.
Incidentally, Astros All-Star Jason Castro is one example of a top Stanford athlete who went pro prior to graduation and returned in the off-seasons to complete his degree. Not to mention, there are a number of other notable and highly successful athletes who have returned to their undergraduate universities to finish their degrees, both while still active and after retirement. Like many student-athletes, how much they emphasize the student, and the athletes, will vary from person to person, even for some who will be making $$$ after going pro.
After rereading, I guess I can see your issue.
I meant her body and her overall game (defense / running a new team etc). Not her personality or makeup.

Tara may also be including her personal requirements for the team. Personality, position needs along with academic requirements limit her pool to about 10. Which is probably ab little smaller than the pool Geno hasI don't care what Tara has to say, if you don't think that athletes get admittance exemptions then you are kidding yourself. I didn't write the article, take it up with the author if you have issue. By the way it was an Op-ed written by a Stanford grad.
The price of athletics at Stanford
It's time for us to consider whether Stanford's policies of heavy investment in athletic programs and recruitment are really in line with the university's mission. Regardless of what we decide to do, we as a university should have a frank discussion about how much we are willing to sacrifice...www.stanforddaily.com
I thought I understood your initial post but now I think maybe I didn't. I don't know why you referenced Boston then. I just want to add Paige might have been better than Boston when she was a junior and Boston a senior. Paige followed that up with an amazing senior year - a type of season superior to Boston when she was senior. Yet we're supposed to put Boston on this elite pedestal while in the same breath be scared that Paige won't be a helluva player in her frosh year? If Paige is going to be a helluva player her frosh year then why be scared to say it? Because she is a "guard" in which some posters only favor size? Guards can be helluva good players as freshmen too. Even guards that play for UCONN and Auriemma.![]()
If Nike offered me a $7,000,000 check to drop out of school, I am wondering what would encourage me to stay in school.Define "passed." Once a student has completed a year at Stanford they are welcome to return to complete their degree at any time. In Tiger's case, his success on the links rendered that guarantee unnecessary. But imagine he had a career-ending injury at 23 - can't imagine he wouldn't have wanted to come back and get it. And funny you should pick that example: Woods said in an interview a few years ago that not staying at Stanford one more year and completing his degree was his "only regret." Given the other actions he taken that one might reasonably think he should regret, that's quite a powerful statement, IMHO.
Incidentally, Astros All-Star Jason Castro is one example of a top Stanford athlete who went pro prior to graduation and returned in the off-seasons to complete his degree. Not to mention, there are a number of other notable and highly successful athletes who have returned to their undergraduate universities to finish their degrees, both while still active and after retirement. Like many student-athletes, how much they emphasize the student, and the athletes, will vary from person to person, even for some who will be making $$$ after going pro.
Define "passed." Once a student has completed a year at Stanford they are welcome to return to complete their degree at any time. In Tiger's case, his success on the links rendered that guarantee unnecessary. But imagine he had a career-ending injury at 23 - can't imagine he wouldn't have wanted to come back and get it. And funny you should pick that example: Woods said in an interview a few years ago that not staying at Stanford one more year and completing his degree was his "only regret." Given the other actions he taken that one might reasonably think he should regret, that's quite a powerful statement, IMHO.
Incidentally, Astros All-Star Jason Castro is one example of a top Stanford athlete who went pro prior to graduation and returned in the off-seasons to complete his degree. Not to mention, there are a number of other notable and highly successful athletes who have returned to their undergraduate universities to finish their degrees, both while still active and after retirement. Like many student-athletes, how much they emphasize the student, and the athletes, will vary from person to person, even for some who will be making $$$ after going pro.
By the time Tiger was 23 he already had more money than I could spend in 10 lifetimes. I am not trying to diminish the value of education but the fact of the matter is that most go to college to have a better life (read make more money) when the fact, at least when I was studying, was that a degree doesn't make you more money. The usual stat used is BS. The income/status of the families of Stanford students are the biggest factor in why they earn more after college. The wealth of your parents is far more predictive of your future earning than both the college you graduated from or even whether or not you went to college.
The first part of your statement is accurate. But the second part is not. The biggest single determinant for upwardly mobile individuals is a college degree. Some studies have estimated that college grads on average earn $1 million more in their lifetime than those without a college degree. The total is even greater for those with advanced degrees (Masters or PHD’s).The wealth of your parents is far more predictive of your future earning than both the college you graduated from or even whether or not you went to college.
Azzi is just trolling Paige with the shorts...Paige is holding her own with Azzi--who once again is wearing UMD shorts.

I don't care what Tara has to say, if you don't think that athletes get admittance exemptions then you are kidding yourself. I didn't write the article, take it up with the author if you have issue. By the way it was an Op-ed written by a Stanford grad.
The price of athletics at Stanford
It's time for us to consider whether Stanford's policies of heavy investment in athletic programs and recruitment are really in line with the university's mission. Regardless of what we decide to do, we as a university should have a frank discussion about how much we are willing to sacrifice...www.stanforddaily.com
Looking at a group of 10 elite colleges and using SAT scores (on the 1600 point scale) as a proxy for academic ability, Princeton researchers found that being a recruited athlete gave an admissions boost equivalent to scoring 200 points higher on the SAT. We can also look at high school scouting reports for football players. Looking at the Stanford recruitment class of 2009 (this year was quite typical in terms of test scores), the median football player who reported scores got an 1800 out of 2400 on the SAT and 26 on the ACT. Based on university statistics, this puts the football median comfortably in the bottom quartile and likely somewhere in the bottom 10 percent in terms of test scores.
The first part of your statement is accurate. But the second part is not. The biggest single determinant for upwardly mobile individuals is a college degree. Some studies have estimated that college grads on average earn $1 million more in their lifetime than those without a college degree. The total is even greater for those with advanced degrees (Masters or PHD’s).