Joe Moorhead rumors (and others) | Page 9 | The Boneyard

Joe Moorhead rumors (and others)

Status
Not open for further replies.
One way to look at that is to think of how sad that is; what on earth are people thinking about if they want to re-hire the guy that walked out.

The other way to look at it is that our fan base is so afraid of a third failure in a row that they are willing to forgive "the ex girlfriend" so that we can get back to 7-5.

We need the next hire to at least be the "7-5" type, where we go to a bowl game every year and fans can expect a few more wins than losses when they buy their tickets...
Hey Dan, understand your viewpoint to getting back to respectable 7 & 5 type but would rather go 9 & 3. "7 & 5 is too close to "6&6", mediocre in the AAC.
After 6 years of futility, getting to 7&5 every year is just okay. Would rather BANG a nine getting to 9&3 or have a ten win season which would be like having a TEN on her knees, if possible..
NO EX GIRLFRIENDS wanted.
LIKE MEETING MY EX WIFE for a cup of coffee....OH GODDDD!
Want 9 & 3 or better in 3 years.... That is just 2 more wins, which is another level. Depends on recruiting to build depth, coaching up AND SCORING POINTS... want an offensive minded coach and a winner.
 
I never understood the idea that Randy had taken the program as far as it could go.

The year prior they finished 8-5 and the 5 losses were by a total of something like 20 points and the next season we went 8-5 and made the Fiesta Bowl with a worse team (IMO).

Randy only needed a QB (easier said than done) and we would have been flirting with 9 to 10 wins with everything else he did exceptionally.

I'm not exactly sure if he's the right hire but the fact that P inherited a team full of NFL guys and then P crapped the bed isn't a reflection on Randy maxing out here.

P.S. if playing in the Fiesta Bowl isn't something you view as being close to our height as a program you may need to recalibrate expectations.
 
Hey Dan, understand your viewpoint to getting back to respectable 7 & 5 type but would rather go 9 & 3. "7 & 5 is too close to "6&6", mediocre in the AAC.
After 6 years of futility, getting to 7&5 every year is just okay. Would rather BANG a nine getting to 9&3 or have a ten win season which would be like having a TEN on her knees, if possible..
NO EX GIRLFRIENDS wanted.
LIKE MEETING MY EX WIFE for a cup of coffee....OH GODDDD!
Want 9 & 3 or better in 3 years.... That is just 2 more wins, which is another level. Depends on recruiting to build depth, coaching up AND SCORING POINTS... want an offensive minded coach and a winner.

You could hire Nick Saban and we are not going to be 9-3 in 3 years.

Good God people -- this is not video college football where you call yourself a school and you can build a program quickly. There are real issues with how successfully how quickly you can be here. You don't have a UConn football fan base with the program win or lose. You aren't in a recruiting area that produces tons of talent. We have changed coaching staffs like some change shirts, hindering relationship building with high schools. Our school is tighter on grades and bad behavior than many of our competitors. Our current roster is just not as good as the top half (at least) of our conference, and if Saban came in today you wouldn't get much help from his recruiting skills until at the earliest the 2019 season, and more likely after that (and while I don't doubt he could recruit better than anyone we've had here, if you think he's geting the kind of kids he gets at 'Bama, or even got at LSU, you need a brain transplant -- the coach matters but so does the program). And we're stuck in a conference no one in our region cares about.

I know you all want to think Edsall as mediocre and it won't be hard to duplicate that, but you're wrong. Coach P had a good career at Syracuse as a head coach, and can obviously coach football or he wouldn't keep landing on his feet. Diaco won the Broyles shortly before coming here. Other than their failure to succeed here, neither of them was viewed as a total loser. Think about that and what it means for a moment.
 
Last edited:
I never understood the idea that Randy had taken the program as far as it could go.

The year prior they finished 8-5 and the 5 losses were by a total of something like 20 points and the next season we went 8-5 and made the Fiesta Bowl with a worse team (IMO).

Randy only needed a QB (easier said than done) and we would have been flirting with 9 to 10 wins with everything else he did exceptionally.

I'm not exactly sure if he's the right hire but the fact that P inherited a team full of NFL guys and then P crapped the bed isn't a reflection on Randy maxing out here.

P.S. if playing in the Fiesta Bowl isn't something you view as being close to our height as a program you may need to recalibrate expectations.
Part of it was him running into academic qualifications issues with Hathaway. Which was also part of what led him to leave.
 
I never understood the idea that Randy had taken the program as far as it could go.

The year prior they finished 8-5 and the 5 losses were by a total of something like 20 points and the next season we went 8-5 and made the Fiesta Bowl with a worse team (IMO).

Randy only needed a QB (easier said than done) and we would have been flirting with 9 to 10 wins with everything else he did exceptionally.

I'm not exactly sure if he's the right hire but the fact that P inherited a team full of NFL guys and then P crapped the bed isn't a reflection on Randy maxing out here.

P.S. if playing in the Fiesta Bowl isn't something you view as being close to our height as a program you may need to recalibrate expectations.

You could hire Nick Saban and we are not going to be 9-3 in 3 years.

Good God people -- this is not video college football where you call yourself a school and you can build a program quickly. There are real issues with how successfully how quickly you can be here. You don't have a UConn football fan base with the program win or lose. You aren't in a recruiting area that produces tons of talent. We have changed coaching staffs like some change shirts, hindering relationship building with high schools. Our school is tighter on grades and bad behavior than many of our competitors. Our current roster is just not as good as the top half (at least) of our conference, and if Saban came in today you wouldn't get much help from his recruiting skills until at the earliest the 2019 season, and more likely after that (and while I don't doubt he could recruit better than anyone we've had here, if you think he's geting the kind of kids he gets at 'Bama, or even got at LSU, you need a brain transplant -- the coach matters but so does the program). And we're stuck in a conference no one in our region cares about.

I know you all want to think Edsall as mediocre and it won't be hard to duplicate that, but you're wrong. Coach P had a good career at Syracuse as a head coach, and can obviously coach football or he wouldn't keep landing on his feet. Diaco won the Broyles shortly before coming here. Other than their failure to succeed here, neither of them was viewed as a total loser. Think about that and what it means for a moment.

You guys do know that Edsall blew the recruitment of Dan O...if it wasn't for Lyndon Johnson doubling back to the house he NEVER would have been a Husky. It's a true story...I heard it from the guy who doubled back to the house.
 
How did he blow it? Curious. I'm on the fence regarding Edsall, I don't mind being swayed.
 
.-.
I never understood the idea that Randy had taken the program as far as it could go.

The year prior they finished 8-5 and the 5 losses were by a total of something like 20 points and the next season we went 8-5 and made the Fiesta Bowl with a worse team (IMO).

Randy only needed a QB (easier said than done) and we would have been flirting with 9 to 10 wins with everything else he did exceptionally.

I'm not exactly sure if he's the right hire but the fact that P inherited a team full of NFL guys and then P crapped the bed isn't a reflection on Randy maxing out here.

P.S. if playing in the Fiesta Bowl isn't something you view as being close to our height as a program you may need to recalibrate expectations.

Yea, but the close game thing works both ways, the Fiesta Bowl year we easily could have been 5-7 and not bowling. His style basically requires us to consistently win the turnover battle by a lot, and do all the little thngs right, and that's hard to do all season, year after year. Eventually to take the next step we need the talent in here that can overcome not playing a perfect game every week and still win.

Also as far as expecations, the fiesta bowl has to be taken out of the equation, the circumstances that got us there don't exist anymore.
 
I never understood the idea that Randy had taken the program as far as it could go.

The year prior they finished 8-5 and the 5 losses were by a total of something like 20 points and the next season we went 8-5 and made the Fiesta Bowl with a worse team (IMO).

Randy only needed a QB (easier said than done) and we would have been flirting with 9 to 10 wins with everything else he did exceptionally.

I'm not exactly sure if he's the right hire but the fact that P inherited a team full of NFL guys and then P crapped the bed isn't a reflection on Randy maxing out here.

P.S. if playing in the Fiesta Bowl isn't something you view as being close to our height as a program you may need to recalibrate expectations.

I agree on the QB issue. With Foley's offensive lines, just a decent QB would have raised the ceiling dramatically. Strange how, after Dan O he just couldn't get the next Dan O or even a close to Dan O type QB.
 
You could hire Nick Saban and we are not going to be 9-3 in 3 years.

Good God people -- this is not video college football where you call yourself a school and you can build a program quickly. There are real issues with how successfully how quickly you can be here. You don't have a UConn football fan base with the program win or lose. You aren't in a recruiting area that produces tons of talent. We have changed coaching staffs like some change shirts, hindering relationship building with high schools. Our school is tighter on grades and bad behavior than many of our competitors. Our current roster is just not as good as the top half (at least) of our conference, and if Saban came in today you wouldn't get much help from his recruiting skills until at the earliest the 2019 season, and more likely after that (and while I don't doubt he could recruit better than anyone we've had here, if you think he's geting the kind of kids he gets at 'Bama, or even got at LSU, you need a brain transplant -- the coach matters but so does the program). And we're stuck in a conference no one in our region cares about.

I know you all want to think Edsall as mediocre and it won't be hard to duplicate that, but you're wrong. Coach P had a good career at Syracuse as a head coach, and can obviously coach football or he wouldn't keep landing on his feet. Diaco won the Broyles shortly before coming here. Other than their failure to succeed here, neither of them was viewed as a total loser. Think about that and what it means for a moment.

Good post. There are no magic wands to wave in college football where suddenly you have success. There will always be programs that try to short cut the system like FAU with Kiffen, but ultimately any success they see is fleeting. Any program that has had success over a long period of time was built like Edsall was trying to build Uconn. The team was competitive in most games it played, winning at a solid clip. Quality players were being recruited and developed all the way to the next level. The fan base was engaged filling the stadium and making for a tough environment for opponents. Finally the program had an identity it could hang its hat on it. It was far from perfect, but you knew what you were getting with Uconn. A physical blue collar team that would fight to the whistle. I have absolutely no idea if Edsall could recapture what he had previously, but the blueprint when followed proved it could work. Coaching Staff he could bring would be key.
 
You could hire Nick Saban and we are not going to be 9-3 in 3 years.

Good God people -- this is not video college football where you call yourself a school and you can build a program quickly. There are real issues with how successfully how quickly you can be here. You don't have a UConn football fan base with the program win or lose. You aren't in a recruiting area that produces tons of talent. We have changed coaching staffs like some change shirts, hindering relationship building with high schools. Our school is tighter on grades and bad behavior than many of our competitors. Our current roster is just not as good as the top half (at least) of our conference, and if Saban came in today you wouldn't get much help from his recruiting skills until at the earliest the 2019 season, and more likely after that (and while I don't doubt he could recruit better than anyone we've had here, if you think he's geting the kind of kids he gets at 'Bama, or even got at LSU, you need a brain transplant -- the coach matters but so does the program). And we're stuck in a conference no one in our region cares about.

I know you all want to think Edsall as mediocre and it won't be hard to duplicate that, but you're wrong. Coach P had a good career at Syracuse as a head coach, and can obviously coach football or he wouldn't keep landing on his feet. Diaco won the Broyles shortly before coming here. Other than their failure to succeed here, neither of them was viewed as a total loser. Think about that and what it means for a moment.





Biz

RE also had more time than both coaches , less expectations upon them and less at stake.
RE also sucked at Maryland. I agree it's a crap shoot when hiring at our level particularly.
All we need to do is look back at the coaches that were in the running for the UConn job when PP was named. Did any of them pan out? I don't think they did.
 
Biz

RE also had more time than both coaches , less expectations upon them and less at stake.
RE also sucked at Maryland. I agree it's a crap shoot when hiring at our level particularly.
All we need to do is look back at the coaches that were in the running for the UConn job when PP was named. Did any of them pan out? I don't think they did.

I am not urging us to hire Edsall. I'm going to let Benedict make this call. But our football program will die if folks don't understand that he did more than a good job here, and that it's more likely that the next hire will produce like P than like Edsall. Everything here is spoiled by Calhoun and Geno.
 
.-.
Hey Dan, understand your viewpoint to getting back to respectable 7 & 5 type but would rather go 9 & 3. "7 & 5 is too close to "6&6", mediocre in the AAC.
After 6 years of futility, getting to 7&5 every year is just okay. Would rather BANG a nine getting to 9&3 or have a ten win season which would be like having a TEN on her knees, if possible..
NO EX GIRLFRIENDS wanted.
LIKE MEETING MY EX WIFE for a cup of coffee....OH GODDDD!
Want 9 & 3 or better in 3 years.... That is just 2 more wins, which is another level. Depends on recruiting to build depth, coaching up AND SCORING POINTS... want an offensive minded coach and a winner.

Of course you would rather go 9-3. I'd rather go 15-0. I'd rather have a threesome with Charlize Theron and Kate Beckinsale. That's besides the point.

The point I'm trying to make is that we need a solid head coach right now; one that can take the pieces we have and turn them into a winning season. Even if he isn't the hottest name. Recruiting responds to success much more than it responds to personality or salesmanship. Going 7-5 a few times will take care of the rest. Getting a "system" coach who needs his own guys to be seniors before he can get to 9-3 would essentially bury us anyways, because we can no longer afford another 2-10 season. There will be no more fans or recruits to show the games to...
 
Zero shot at Fleck.

Also tweeted by (Nathan?) is Moorheads replacement at Fordham Andrew Breiner. Was grad assistant at UConn under Joe while he was here and became Passing Game coordinator at Fordham under Joe.

Orlando would be interesting. I'm not interested in Weist, no P associations please. Schiano....Eh. RE, Golden, other retreads - no.
TJ was brought in by Warde not P.
 
Are we going to hear who has/will be interviewed or is there just going to be an edict from on high? When we see blue smoke emerging from the chimney of the AD's building, we'll know that a new head coach has been chosen??
 
.-.
Because he's coached here before, has had success, and feels that experience will make him successful as the head guy. Right now it looks like his stock is only rising and he'll have p5 opportunities next year but you never know. Also, all p5 jobs aren't the same.

Not saying it will happen, but I think that's the argument. If we didn't have a connection to him I'd say no chance.
AAC coaches have great P5 opportunities - Texas comes to mind
 
That makes no sense. Fickell and Kiffin accepted jobs and are coaching in CFP games. The PSU bowl game has no bearing on anything.

If he wants the job and has the job there is no reason to delay an announcement other than it's gotten too close to their game whereas it would have been fine 2+ weeks ago.

If he goes he is not telling anyone at PSU until after the bowl - as it should be.
 
You guys do know that Edsall blew the recruitment of Dan O...if it wasn't for Lyndon Johnson doubling back to the house he NEVER would have been a Husky. It's a true story...I heard it from the guy who doubled back to the house.
Gentlemen i was in the house at that time part of the decision process Dan committed to RE and waivered once and RE found out and made a phone call . i think to this day Dan is a staunch supporter or HCRE
 
Gentlemen i was in the house at that time part of the decision process Dan committed to RE and waivered once and RE found out and made a phone call . i think to this day Dan is a staunch supporter or HCRE

Maybe RE can convince DO to hang up the spikes and be his OC.

I kid. Mostly.
 
.-.
Maybe RE can convince DO to hang up the spikes and be his OC.

I kid. Mostly.

I think you mean QB coach and strength and conditioning coach.

I don't think, to this day, anyone out worked Dan O. Maybe Fincher was a close second.
 
Gentlemen i was in the house at that time part of the decision process Dan committed to RE and waivered once and RE found out and made a phone call . i think to this day Dan is a staunch supporter or HCRE
I heard my story from the guy who doubled back and was by RE's side from UConn to MD.....Lyndon Johnson now on Ambrose's staff at Towson.
 
UConn needs the guy that can bring in the next Teddy Bridgewater, Greg Warde or Blake Bortles and obviously that's not Edsall. Give the Edsall thing a rest. He's a research assistant for a reason. Let him start over in the FCS. UConn doesn't need any washouts from the ACC or B1G. They need a guy that was successful there, not shown the door.
 
That makes no sense. Fickell and Kiffin accepted jobs and are coaching in CFP games. The PSU bowl game has no bearing on anything.

If he wants the job and has the job there is no reason to delay an announcement other than it's gotten too close to their game whereas it would have been fine 2+ weeks ago.
We are where we are and it would definitely be a distraction. Imagine if he came out with an announcement and they had a poor offensive showing? You don't think he would get blamed?
 
Edsall burned every bridge to go fail someplace else. No shot.
It looks like I need to eat crow here. I should have leaned my lesson. I remember thinking when the PP rumors were around, why would we hire that washed-up hack? Because we're UConn.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,305
Messages
4,562,310
Members
10,457
Latest member
caw2


Top Bottom