DavidinNaples
11 is way better than 2..!! :)
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2013
- Messages
- 1,062
- Reaction Score
- 16,185
According to Jim Fuller, UConn's bench "often times " played "downright dreadful" in the AAC tournament. Really? I missed those wretched performances. Perhaps I was watching the wrong channel. It must be true because Fuller, the run on sentence king, actually offered evidence to support his theory. The "key reserves" shot 3-16 during the tournament. Wow, talk about documentation!
Just for fun, I conducted a slightly more extensive examination of the "key reserves" and their play over the last 5 games. The games were played from March 1-10 and include two games against Rutgers, two versus Louisville and a single game with Cincinnati.
1. The main duty of the bench is to give the starters rest. Despite their superior conditioning, Stewie and crew need a break now and again. Especially when playing at the end of a long season or in back to back games. In those five games, Stokes, Chong and Banks played 174 minutes. TLAW and Polly added 13 minutes of what the eloquent Fuller called "garbage time." So the reserves provided 187 minutes of play. Divide that by five games, then by five starters and the reserves gave each starter an average of 7 1/2 minutes of rest per game. Mission accomplished.
2. The second goal of the bench is to preserve the lead built up by the starters. In the last five games, UConn had halftime leads of 25, 12, 20, 31 and 18 points. The final margin of victory in those five games was 37, 20, 30, 26 and 20 points. So in 4 of the 5 games, the lead was actually extended further by the end of the game. The only exception was Rutgers reducing a ridiculous 31 point deficit to just 26 in the AAC semi final. Goal #2 met.
3. Did the reserves contribute anything positive to UConn's victories or were they "downright dreadful" as Fuller claims? Their shooting in the five games was not a whole lot better, 7-24 or 29%. Considering that Shoni Schimmel shot 7-25 in just a single game vs. five games for UConn's reserves, can we at least give them credit for NOT cranking up shot after shot. Passing the ball to Stewie or KML is actually a smart thing when they are shooting 50% from the field. No mention was made of the reserves' free throw shooting, probably because they went 10-12 or 83%. That is pretty far from "dreadful." Stokes, Chong and Banks also grabbed 42 rebounds, handed out 8 assists, blocked 10 shots and pilfered 4 steals. All of that versus 9 turnovers. Fuller somehow missed those contributions.
There is plenty room for improvement for UConn's non-starters in the NCAA tournament. I'm sure Geno is working on that as this very moment. But to call their recent efforts "downright dreadful" is to minimize a tremendous effort and a noticeable contribution to five great wins.
Go Huskies..!!
Last edited: