- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 16,526
- Reaction Score
- 37,257
Question with zero snark. Do you?
I'm curious of the opinion of all naysayers.
I'm a middle of the road guy myself. Jury's out.
I think it's becoming evident that KO was/is in over his head in terms of running all aspects of an elite college basketball program. He did an excellent job in 2013-2014 molding guys who JC recruited, and who possessed the necessary toughness and attitude.
He has not done a good job bringing in the next generation of players. Some of that was hindered by JC's sanctions. Some of that was his own poor judgment in identifying and sealing the deal with the right players. In another thread I pointed out that during his tenure, he's had 6 top 50 recruits enter as freshmen. Only one of them (Adams, so far) would you label an unmitigated success. Several #50-100 players haven't panned out either, and the record on transfers is mixed. Player development has been good in some cases (most guards, DD, Giff), severely lacking or too slow in others (most bigs, Purvis).
In-game coaching has occasionally been brilliant (2014 Tournament), but since then has been mediocre. And, with the reports that have come out lately, managing his staff and locker room has been an issue.
In short, it's what you should have expected 5 years ago -- a guy with minimal experience learning on the job. Frankly, I think it was an insult to the program's history and a detriment to JC's own legacy that he forced upon us an unproven coach who it would take years to figure out how to run a program. That's not what elite programs do.
I don't know if KO can get us back to that level, or even one notch below. It's evident this offseason that whether through his own introspection or having Benedict in his ear, he is realizing his failures and changing. We don't know yet whether it's for the better, whether he can "get it" soon enough to save the program.