UcMiami
How it is
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 13,917
- Reaction Score
- 22,841
In the news links there is one to Jeff's column on the champions center:
http://www.ctnow.com/sports/hc-jacobs-col-first-night-uconn-1018-20141017,0,4089585.column
I think he does a nice job of treading the line between gentle nudge and complaint regarding former players' donations to Uconn. At the risk of being 'political' I wanted to post some additional thoughts:
The difference between women's team players and men's team players are numerous and it starts with
1. professional prospects - the men who make it to the NBA earn in a single year what the women are likely to earn in their entire career. There are more professional stars coming out of the women's program, but just a couple of numbers: Ray Allen - career earnings $184M, Emeka Okafor $90M. Hard to find the numbers for players like DT or Sue but for the 10-12 yrs of their careers $10M is probably generous of which less than $1M comes from WNBA salaries and the rest is from playing the rest of the year overseas.
2. 4 years at Uconn for women vs. 2-4 yrs for men. The women stick around so they probably have a stronger connection to campus and the school - the two men listed above both played three years at Uconn (The men's program is certainly not known for the 1 and done players that other 'powerhouse' programs seem to pursue thankfully.)
The other difference that I see is gratitude. The women feel grateful for their opportunities to play in college, professionally, internationally, and for national teams. I can only remember one women's star who declined an invitation to train for the national team while fit - the men's national team history is littered with players declining those invitations.
And that gratitude shows up in the response to requests like the funding of facilities at Uconn - with infinitely more limited resources the women step up in a way the men don't.
http://www.ctnow.com/sports/hc-jacobs-col-first-night-uconn-1018-20141017,0,4089585.column
I think he does a nice job of treading the line between gentle nudge and complaint regarding former players' donations to Uconn. At the risk of being 'political' I wanted to post some additional thoughts:
The difference between women's team players and men's team players are numerous and it starts with
1. professional prospects - the men who make it to the NBA earn in a single year what the women are likely to earn in their entire career. There are more professional stars coming out of the women's program, but just a couple of numbers: Ray Allen - career earnings $184M, Emeka Okafor $90M. Hard to find the numbers for players like DT or Sue but for the 10-12 yrs of their careers $10M is probably generous of which less than $1M comes from WNBA salaries and the rest is from playing the rest of the year overseas.
2. 4 years at Uconn for women vs. 2-4 yrs for men. The women stick around so they probably have a stronger connection to campus and the school - the two men listed above both played three years at Uconn (The men's program is certainly not known for the 1 and done players that other 'powerhouse' programs seem to pursue thankfully.)
The other difference that I see is gratitude. The women feel grateful for their opportunities to play in college, professionally, internationally, and for national teams. I can only remember one women's star who declined an invitation to train for the national team while fit - the men's national team history is littered with players declining those invitations.
And that gratitude shows up in the response to requests like the funding of facilities at Uconn - with infinitely more limited resources the women step up in a way the men don't.