- Joined
- Feb 16, 2012
- Messages
- 3,007
- Reaction Score
- 3,946
not good, you want him to stand out.
He will. As was mentioned earlier, most of these tweets mentioned more of the unknowns. RP is way more than an unknown. Plus, this is just one practice.
not good, you want him to stand out.
This pains me to say it but I agree with you. These guys work hard, have solid skills and are true Huskies. I respect everything they have done for this program and they are all great ambassadors to be wearing UConn on their chest. However the past 2 years with them as the "core" of the team hasn't been the best. They have shown flashes but both seasons have ended in mediocracy. All three have skills but are limited in their play. Unless somehow they take the next step and put it together, which I doubt will happen on their fourth season, we pretty much know what we're getting: a great offensive rebounder with limited offense, an excellent shot-blocker with timing issues on his rebounds and defense that lead to fouls, and a bull of a guard with a solid shot who just can't seem to harness his speed. I feel the ceiling is much higher with this new group of guys since they are all so much younger and I'd love to see them come in and challenge the vets for roster spots. Just hope this wouldn't cause chemistry issues.I'm hoping the collection of new guys are good enough to cut into Rodney's PT. I'm hoping Brimah's PT gets cut as well. For that matter, include Facey in that group too. I know who they are and I doubt they change all that much. They are ok players. They will win us some games. They will probably lose us some games as well.
If the younger guys develop and send Purv, Brimah and Facey to the bench....oh well. They won't be on the bench because they're getting worse. They will be on the bench because the others are better.
I'm hoping the collection of new guys are good enough to cut into Rodney's PT. I'm hoping Brimah's PT gets cut as well. For that matter, include Facey in that group too. I know who they are and I doubt they change all that much. They are ok players. They will win us some games. They will probably lose us some games as well.
If the younger guys develop and send Purv, Brimah and Facey to the bench....oh well. They won't be on the bench because they're getting worse. They will be on the bench because the others are better.
I hadn't seen this tweet before.
I'm hoping the collection of new guys are good enough to cut into Rodney's PT. I'm hoping Brimah's PT gets cut as well. For that matter, include Facey in that group too. I know who they are and I doubt they change all that much. They are ok players. They will win us some games. They will probably lose us some games as well.
If the younger guys develop and send Purv, Brimah and Facey to the bench....oh well. They won't be on the bench because they're getting worse. They will be on the bench because the others are better.
So I guess the days of breakout senior leadership are gone?
I mean, we've seen Hilton Armstrong do it, AJ Price did it, Jerome Dyson, and Boatright's shooting improved 100%.
So I guess the days of breakout senior leadership are gone?
I mean, we've seen Hilton Armstrong do it, AJ Price did it, Jerome Dyson, and Boatright's shooting improved 100%.
I'm hoping the collection of new guys are good enough to cut into Rodney's PT. I'm hoping Brimah's PT gets cut as well. For that matter, include Facey in that group too. I know who they are and I doubt they change all that much. They are ok players. They will win us some games. They will probably lose us some games as well.
If the younger guys develop and send Purv, Brimah and Facey to the bench....oh well. They won't be on the bench because they're getting worse. They will be on the bench because the others are better.
AJP became a leader during his junior year, what did Dyson lead during his senior year?
Not disagreeing with the larger point, but Price and Dyson are strange examples as one could make the argument that both were better as juniors.
The point on Purvis, Brimah, and Facey isn't entirely unfair, but they're all - the former two especially - good players who happen to be extremely frustrating at time. So while perhaps it's true that we won't win a title with them as our best players, we're certainly not going to accomplish anything without them on the court.
I thought he had a very Rodney-like build-up, and then 2009 was Dyson's year, no? Until the ACL?
AJ was the lead PG in 2008, but he took his game to a whole new level in 2009. He was not nearly the offensive force in 2008 that he was in 2009. In parts of 2009, he was unstoppable.
I have no idea what a Rodney like build-up means because he(Rodney) hasn't accomplished much yet. 2008 AJP was clearly the best player, 2009 was more balanced as far as best player on the team since he was inconcistent following the ACL tear and then played better in the 2nd half of the year when Dyson had a meniscus tear, you could make arguments for AJP/Hasheem/Adrien during different stretches. Dyson's senior year was the 2009-2010 when the team figured out every way imaginable to lose close games, Dyson had a great start to the season statistically but tailed off down the stretch, he didn't lead that team to anything.
Unless I'm missing something about Brimah's role as shot blocker, haven't most, if not all, of our previous great/very good shot blockers been good rebounders as well?Mau with all respect the way we use Brimah as a shot blocker and a person responsible for missed assignments make it very difficult for him to be a defensive rebounder.
If our perimeter is lock down then not using him in the Libero role increases the rebounding but otherwise he is disadvantaged . (Sorry I'm an old soccer coach)
That's why I think 5-6 primarily offensive rebounds will be great. I think he can be a put back Force.
On defense his ability to take an Opposing player out of the play ( block out) will be huge
He has improved in this category but must get better.
If I was coaching against UConn Brimah is the only UConn player that makes me adjust my offensive game plan ,that is something I suspect we will miss.
Rodney lead the team in scoring--but has been inconsistent in his game. AJ's junior year seemed very Rodney-ish. AJ came on at the end of his junior year, just as Rodney came on in his. In AJ's senior year, he shot better than he ever did before.
I'm talking about actual performance, by the way. Not leadership. The original poster didn't mention leadership as the key factor of discussion, but their actual play.
Rodney lead the team in scoring--but has been inconsistent in his game. AJ's junior year seemed very Rodney-ish. AJ came on at the end of his junior year, just as Rodney came on in his. In AJ's senior year, he shot better than he ever did before.
I'm talking about actual performance, by the way. Not leadership. The original poster didn't mention leadership as the key factor of discussion, but their actual play.
Yea there's no way I agree at all with putting AJ's junior year with Rodney, not even close. AJ was unanimous First Team All Big East and made the 2nd team of the US Basketball Writer's Association All America Team, Rodney didn't even make any AAC teams. AJ's numbers for his junior and senior years are damn near identical, he just shot better from 3 his senior year. Performance, leadership, actually playing well in big games and not just putting up numbers when behind by double digits, Rodney is not on AJ's level.
Rodney is no AJ but man you are tough on him.Yea there's no way I agree at all with putting AJ's junior year with Rodney, not even close. AJ was unanimous First Team All Big East and made the 2nd team of the US Basketball Writer's Association All America Team, Rodney didn't even make any AAC teams. AJ's numbers for his junior and senior years are damn near identical, he just shot better from 3 his senior year. Performance, leadership, actually playing well in big games and not just putting up numbers when behind by double digits, Rodney is not on AJ's level.
I interpreted you saying AJ's junior year as being "Rodney-ish" as being on similar levels, AJ's junior year wasn't Rodney-ish, it was just simply better. I don't really see where AJ took this major leap, he became a better 3 point shooter because he said thats all he was able to work on during the initial stages of his ACL recovery, but he also became much more reliant on his jumper and didn't drive as much post-ACL injury. His 3ball % went up from 37% to 40%, but his overall FG% declined from 44% to 41%. The overall numbers between both years are very similar.I didn't say Rodney was at AJ's level.
I mean, we're confusing things here. I thought AJ took over games and was one of the hottest UConn players ever. I rate him very very highly. BUT--I think AJ made a huge leap between those two years, mainly because he was an unstoppable shooter. He was clearly the best PG in the league--both years. But he added a huge element to his game in his senior year. This is what I'm referencing: IMPROVEMENT. It can happen for seniors. That is the only point I'm making.
I interpreted you saying AJ's junior year as being "Rodney-ish" as being on similar levels, AJ's junior year wasn't Rodney-ish, it was just simply better. I don't really see where AJ took this major leap, he became a better 3 point shooter because he said thats all he was able to work on during the initial stages of his ACL recovery, but he also became much more reliant on his jumper and didn't drive as much post-ACL injury. His 3ball % went up from 37% to 40%, but his overall FG% declined from 44% to 41%. The overall numbers between both years are very similar.
A.J. Price Stats | Basketball-Reference.com
Rodney is no AJ but man you are tough on him.