intlzncster
i fart in your general direction
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 28,928
- Reaction Score
- 60,230
Get in line behind me. I have been waiting years already for this to happen.
With you brother.
Get in line behind me. I have been waiting years already for this to happen.
The Jordan Bulls 2.0 broke up over money. Winning doesn’t cure all.The reality is no one would care about the deficit if we were winning. But we're not, so it's front and center.
Why would they listen to the that?
Why would they listen to the that? What's changed for them from last time to this time vis a vis schools like BCU? What's the impetus for the football schools to go for this?
How do you call the ACC and ask if we dropped our football program would you be interested in us joining in all other sports?
Pick up phone. Dial phone. Ask for Swof. Start talking.
I don't think the votes would be there...Notre Dame brought needed football match ups and was an exception...
The ACC, if like today, probably is not looking to shore up basketball in March.
Presently, the pressure is off...unlike when it was a race to make the P5.
The ACC has won 3 of the last 6 football NC's and the ACC won the 2015 and 2017 basketball N.C....and have a shot to win the BB national Championship this year..and thus have the football NC and basketball NC in the same school year, as well as NC's in women's basketball and softball...that would be a very good year.
If you they bleed money in perpetuity, then they are not viable. The budget can't support it.
The only solution is 1. get new revenue 2. cut costs. If you can't do #1, then you have to do #2.
But...ESPN is a leader in streaming...and the ACCN is marketed through sling, roku, playstation, etc.
Streaming is just another way to receive content...
I've never liked the way UConn reports athletic department revenues and expenses. Remember, there are athletic department expenses that are not "sport" costs and royalties, licensing, advertising, and sponsorships are not allocated to specific teams, even though those revenues are really associated with football and basketball.
If you include royalties, licensing, advertising, and sponsorships as part of football, men's basketball, and women's basketball revenues (which I think is fair), the total deficit for those programs becomes $1.7 million.
The rest of UConn's sports lost a combined $22.3 million, but this is up ~$5.6 million from 2014. Here are the 2014 losses by sport: Track and field lost $2.7 million, Baseball lost $1.1 million, Field Hockey lost $1.3 million, Men's and Women's Hockey lost $2.6 million, Women's lacrosse lost $1 million, Women's rowing lost $800k, Men's soccer lost $1.6 million, Women's soccer lost $1.2 million, Softball lost $1 million, Swimming and Diving lost $1.6 million, Tennis lost $600k, Volleyball lost $1 million, and Golf lost $200k.
Also, UConn spent slightly more than $60 million in 2013, yet was spending $80 million by 2017. Why the massive increase? It is not football (loss up $900k since 2014) or travel as those expenditures have been relatively stable. We spent $6.9 million on travel in 2014 and $7.3 million in 2018.
There are plenty of opportunities for improved revenues.
If you go back and look at the numbers, in 2014, when UConn was in the AAC, football generated $5.2 million in ticket sales vs. $3.3 million in 2017 and $2.4 million in 2018. Clearly, losing has had a dramatic impact on football ticket sales, so there is an opportunity for improvement.
Same with men's basketball. Attendance was at a 30 year low last year. Again, losing impacts ticket sales. In addition, AAC men's basketball has not done well in the NCAA tournament which negatively impactsunits/payouts. I think AAC basketball is improving, so units should improve leading to higher revenues, but that will take time. Honestly, Memphis and UConn need to pull their weight here.
Yeah and the ACC Network is LIN E AR as in watch it on your TV through your cable box.
THE Big Ten Network and SECN are doomed as well?
You will watch the ACCN roll out through wi fi...
ESPN has agreements with Hulu, PlayStation Vue, DirecTV Now, Sling TV, and YouTube TV to carry its programming already.
I've never liked the way UConn reports athletic department revenues and expenses. Remember, there are athletic department expenses that are not "sport" costs and royalties, licensing, advertising, and sponsorships are not allocated to specific teams, even though those revenues are really associated with football and basketball.
If you include royalties, licensing, advertising, and sponsorships as part of football, men's basketball, and women's basketball revenues (which I think is fair), the total deficit for those programs becomes $1.7 million.
The rest of UConn's sports lost a combined $22.3 million, but this is up ~$5.6 million from 2014. Here are the 2014 losses by sport: Track and field lost $2.7 million, Baseball lost $1.1 million, Field Hockey lost $1.3 million, Men's and Women's Hockey lost $2.6 million, Women's lacrosse lost $1 million, Women's rowing lost $800k, Men's soccer lost $1.6 million, Women's soccer lost $1.2 million, Softball lost $1 million, Swimming and Diving lost $1.6 million, Tennis lost $600k, Volleyball lost $1 million, and Golf lost $200k.
Also, UConn spent slightly more than $60 million in 2013, yet was spending $80 million by 2017. Why the massive increase? It is not football (loss up $900k since 2014) or travel as those expenditures have been relatively stable. We spent $6.9 million on travel in 2014 and $7.3 million in 2018.
There are plenty of opportunities for improved revenues.
If you go back and look at the numbers, in 2014, when UConn was in the AAC, football generated $5.2 million in ticket sales vs. $3.3 million in 2017 and $2.4 million in 2018. Clearly, losing has had a dramatic impact on football ticket sales, so there is an opportunity for improvement.
Same with men's basketball. Attendance was at a 30 year low last year. Again, losing impacts ticket sales. In addition, AAC men's basketball has not done well in the NCAA tournament which negatively impactsunits/payouts. I think AAC basketball is improving, so units should improve leading to higher revenues, but that will take time. Honestly, Memphis and UConn need to pull their weight here.
Who said they were dead? I’m talking about making them more attractive with basketball programs that people watch.
Why in the hell are you here? Are you providing a service?
Providing info...some you seem to miss. My view is different because my vantage point is different.
I just commented that the ACC was less vulnerable today than it was...and that Notre Dame and their five games in football brought something different to the conference than UConn's basketball...it was perceived, at the time, as plugging a hole.
And you get your ubdies wadded up.
Someone also needs to ask how the University and the Trustees can, under any scenario of fiscal responsibility, greenlight a very costly baseball/softball/soccer renovation given the current state of affairs. It’s criminal.I've never liked the way UConn reports athletic department revenues and expenses. Remember, there are athletic department expenses that are not "sport" costs and royalties, licensing, advertising, and sponsorships are not allocated to specific teams, even though those revenues are really associated with football and basketball.
If you include royalties, licensing, advertising, and sponsorships as part of football, men's basketball, and women's basketball revenues (which I think is fair), the total deficit for those programs becomes $1.7 million.
The rest of UConn's sports lost a combined $22.3 million, but this is up ~$5.6 million from 2014. Here are the 2014 losses by sport: Track and field lost $2.7 million, Baseball lost $1.1 million, Field Hockey lost $1.3 million, Men's and Women's Hockey lost $2.6 million, Women's lacrosse lost $1 million, Women's rowing lost $800k, Men's soccer lost $1.6 million, Women's soccer lost $1.2 million, Softball lost $1 million, Swimming and Diving lost $1.6 million, Tennis lost $600k, Volleyball lost $1 million, and Golf lost $200k.
Also, UConn spent slightly more than $60 million in 2013, yet was spending $80 million by 2017. Why the massive increase? It is not football (loss up $900k since 2014) or travel as those expenditures have been relatively stable. We spent $6.9 million on travel in 2014 and $7.3 million in 2018.
There are plenty of opportunities for improved revenues.
If you go back and look at the numbers, in 2014, when UConn was in the AAC, football generated $5.2 million in ticket sales vs. $3.3 million in 2017 and $2.4 million in 2018. Clearly, losing has had a dramatic impact on football ticket sales, so there is an opportunity for improvement.
Same with men's basketball. Attendance was at a 30 year low last year. Again, losing impacts ticket sales. In addition, AAC men's basketball has not done well in the NCAA tournament which negatively impactsunits/payouts. I think AAC basketball is improving, so units should improve leading to higher revenues, but that will take time. Honestly, Memphis and UConn need to pull their weight here.
How do you call the ACC and ask if we dropped our football program would you be interested in us joining in all other sports?
Pick up phone. Dial phone. Ask for Swof. Start talking.
Responded to this comment...
Not happening IMHO...that's all...and I suspect that you, if you know all that, also know this.
UConn athletic department in 2018: generated $40 million in revenue, $81 million in expenses - Hartford Courant
Negative $41 million in revenue, $8.7 million of which is football (shocker) and $5 million of which is Men’s basketball. Also saw that $7.3 million went to team travel. Where are the guys that say we don’t want the big east? Maybe they can get the bill on this one.
at least they can never take away our memories <
Delta State and Louisiana Tech it is