Is the B1G realistic? | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Is the B1G realistic?

Status
Not open for further replies.
But I agree about Herbst and Manuel. They even were quoted back in 2011/2012 that they were not going to push anything and were going to let things play out then make their move. Something along those lines, but I'm a strong supporter of the idea that the administration dropped the ball.
You also like to talk out of you a**, so there's that.

Not saying they did a great job, but it's pretty common knowledge by now that the Louisville invite happened mostly because of factors outside UConn's control.
 
You also like to talk out of you a* , so there's that.

Not saying they did a great job, but it's pretty common knowledge by now that the Louisville invite happened mostly because of factors outside UConn's control.
Louisville's AD was lobbying for an ACC invite the day they took Pitt and Syracuse. If UConn had done that we might have been given the invitation.
 
Excuses are for losers. Quite frankly, surprisingly the big conference that makes the most sense is the SEC. Everyone already has enough tough football games, we would improve basketball and a footprint in the NYC metro area would match what the Big 10 and ACC already have.
That's almost as bad an idea as northeast Catholic school in the ACC.
 
Louisville's AD was lobbying for an ACC invite the day they took Pitt and Syracuse. If UConn had done that we might have been given the invitation.
No. That's an incredibly simplified - and incorrect - assumption to what was a very complicated situation.

UConn never was getting the necessary votes for an ACC invite for a few reasons:

1. Florida State (and Clemson) was threatening to leave the conference if the ACC took another northern basketball school. It was a power move by FSU and co., and Louisville (ranked in football at the time) was the victor of it.
2. BC and Syracuse were lobbying against UConn because we compete in the same regions for recruits. BC's old AD even said as much ("We want to be the only New England team in the ACC") shortly after Syracuse and Pitt were invited.
3. Miami's piece of president is still bitter over the lawsuit (Shala wouldn't even answer Herbst's phone calls). This, obviously, was something done long before any of the current administration was in power.

Not saying Herbst and Manuel did everything right, but most of what happened was beyond their control.
 
Last edited:
We are a flagship public university in a market that the B1G desperately wants to tap into more. I personally think we are on a 3-5 year plan to get into the B1G. Here are the things that currently hurt us and what UCONN is doing to address them:

1. No AAU. This is probably the biggest deterrent but UCONN already measures favorably to other AAU institutions based on a few metrics. President Herbst recently secured $1.5B in state aid to, in large part, expand research. We are one of a very few U.S. universities in the Universistas 21 (global research version of the AAU) and now that Ohio State just accepted membership, I hope we can use that as a network opportunity.

2. Low endowment figure (currently around $340M) in comparison with other B1G schools (Rutgers is around $900M I think). President Herbst hired Emory's fundraiser who helped raise over $1B to Emory's endowment and UCONN has added a few houses in the greater Hartford area to "wine and dine" potential donors. Herbst has said that her goal is to get UCONN's endowment closer to $1B.

3. Football program and venue. Aside from TV market growth potential, football is the primary (but not sole) driver in CR. Jeff Hathaway's uninspired, awful hire of Paul Pasqualoni derailed one of the once fastest growing football programs in the country. UCONN also plays in a small off-campus stadium that is not thought of too favorably by fans outside of Connecticut. Warde Manuel's hiring of Bob Diaco is a big, first step in turning football competitive once again. He increased the Assistant coach salary pool and, as a result, Diaco assembled a fantastic staff full of former recruiting coordinators. I think Diaco will be able to recruit fairly well despite the AAC disadvantage that must be overcome. I also think that the program will win again. We already have more former players in the NFL today than Syracuse, Pitt, and Louisville. The goal though is bowl games. We don't need a National Championship contender…we just need a solid 7-win program to bring fans back to the Rent. Which leads me to the stadium issue: UCONN needs to either look into plans to expand the Rent at some point OR look into building a new on-campus stadium (although there are significant hurdles with this). We all know that Rentschler Field was built with the footings to accommodate an expansion of 10-15,000 seats, so the sooner the program wins and the fans come back, the sooner UCONN can talk expansion.

4. Post-APR/Calhoun establishment. While football is the primary driver, the B1G also needs other content to air when football season is not in progress. There is no questioning the prestige and history of both basketball programs but there is some question around the country of whether UCONN MBB can get back to a championship caliber program after Calhoun's retirement and APR mess (once again, thanks to Hathaway). I think Ollie was the best hire to restore UCONN basketball. It's a shame that UCONN has to prove itself all over again but it does. Ollie is a UCONN guy and loves the school and he will bust his tail to win. He also has pull with former Huskies who can help him in restoring/continuing the proud tradition.

Personally, I think UCONN will be in the B1G in the next 3-5 years. I think Rutgers was added first simply because of market and football recruiting location. The B1G's goal is to gain NYC eyeballs. Adding UCONN would give them more NYC access, as well as exposure in Boston and locking in our own #31 market where there is no competition of other college or professional sports. Adding UCONN BB could also bode well for scheduling future basketball events (perhaps a conference tournament?) in NYC. But UCONN has some work to do first: get closer to AAU, increase endowment, win football games and draw fans, and consistently show MBB can win post-Calhoun.
 
.-.
Did the CR odometer roll over and I missed it? Or did the Delorean hit 88?
 
All that matters is Football and market. We have neither
Think you're wrong about the market. The market numbers that look vaguely small are the Hartford-New Haven DMA. But everyone knows that UConn gets big play in Fairfield County...which is in the NYC DMA. That means, by definition, UConn gets basic pull in the NYC DMA...couple that with the ratings and money SNY is able to pull, and I think you'd see our market is quite good, with its tentacles firmly into most of Southern New England.

Football needs to turn around, and they need to keep improving their academics. To me, it's all a big "IF." If the the B1G were to expand, could they get Texas? If so, we're ducked. Same if they can get UVA and UNC. But I think those are out the question. So I think, if UConn's football turns around, if they keep up improving their academics, the B1G would at least give a serious look if they expand. But will they expand?
 
Last edited:
You are wrong roars. The overall outlook of Pittsburgh is a slow decline, nothing drastic but not as positive as you stated. As an actuary I've done some work concerning certain aspects of Pittsburgh and Cincinnati recently. Not trying to ruffle your feathers or fur just stating what I learned and decision was made by 2 major companies to build and invest elsewhere.
 
If UConn had done that we might have been given the invitation.
Yeah no. "Lobbying" is not what made the difference here, and any thought that begging louder would have made a difference is ill-contrived. See Dooley's post, above, for a nice review. We didn't get in because we didn't have the cred. Simple as that. Get the cred, then we get the invite.
 
.-.
Louisville's AD was lobbying for an ACC invite the day they took Pitt and Syracuse. If UConn had done that we might have been given the invitation.

Nonsense.

We were never cracking the FSU/Miami/GT/BC blockade - likely never will given that they now have Pitt and Syracuse with 'em.
 
We were never cracking the FSU/Miami/GT/BC blockade - likely never will given that they now have Pitt and Syracuse with 'em.

Why? Is it just because we made them our bitches? Is it as simple as that?
 
Nonsense.

We were never cracking the FSU/Miami/GT/BC blockade - likely never will given that they now have Pitt and Syracuse with 'em.
It will be a difficult task but not impossible.
The ACC will make a bid for us if it looks like we are next in line for the B1g.
Even a non-strategic thinker like Swafford will see what a nightmare scenario that would be. The love will be amazing . Our close and personal friends will appeal to the great shared traditions of our fellow big East Schools. ESPN will beat the drum for the glorious reunion. The may even replay the six overtime game.
If I'm still here I will throw-up. If I'm not at least mention it turned out exactly like the old desert rat predicted.
 
.-.
After the title I was expecting the thread to be "...in thinking that Rutgers isnt going to destroy their league."
 
Half of them are worried that we'll suck at football forever and the other half is scared to death that we won't.
That might be the best one-liner on this entire site that explains us not getting into the ACC.

Kudos.
 
Half of them are worried that we'll suck at football forever and the other half is scared to death that we won't.
That's a compliment. At least the latter half of the statement.
 
.-.
We are a flagship public university in a market that the B1G desperately wants to tap into more. I personally think we are on a 3-5 year plan to get into the B1G. Here are the things that currently hurt us and what UCONN is doing to address them:

1. No AAU. This is probably the biggest deterrent but UCONN already measures favorably to other AAU institutions based on a few metrics. President Herbst recently secured $1.5B in state aid to, in large part, expand research. We are one of a very few U.S. universities in the Universistas 21 (global research version of the AAU) and now that Ohio State just accepted membership, I hope we can use that as a network opportunity.

2. Low endowment figure (currently around $340M) in comparison with other B1G schools (Rutgers is around $900M I think). President Herbst hired Emory's fundraiser who helped raise over $1B to Emory's endowment and UCONN has added a few houses in the greater Hartford area to "wine and dine" potential donors. Herbst has said that her goal is to get UCONN's endowment closer to $1B.

3. Football program and venue. Aside from TV market growth potential, football is the primary (but not sole) driver in CR. Jeff Hathaway's uninspired, awful hire of Paul Pasqualoni derailed one of the once fastest growing football programs in the country. UCONN also plays in a small off-campus stadium that is not thought of too favorably by fans outside of Connecticut. Warde Manuel's hiring of Bob Diaco is a big, first step in turning football competitive once again. He increased the Assistant coach salary pool and, as a result, Diaco assembled a fantastic staff full of former recruiting coordinators. I think Diaco will be able to recruit fairly well despite the AAC disadvantage that must be overcome. I also think that the program will win again. We already have more former players in the NFL today than Syracuse, Pitt, and Louisville. The goal though is bowl games. We don't need a National Championship contender…we just need a solid 7-win program to bring fans back to the Rent. Which leads me to the stadium issue: UCONN needs to either look into plans to expand the Rent at some point OR look into building a new on-campus stadium (although there are significant hurdles with this). We all know that Rentschler Field was built with the footings to accommodate an expansion of 10-15,000 seats, so the sooner the program wins and the fans come back, the sooner UCONN can talk expansion.

4. Post-APR/Calhoun establishment. While football is the primary driver, the B1G also needs other content to air when football season is not in progress. There is no questioning the prestige and history of both basketball programs but there is some question around the country of whether UCONN MBB can get back to a championship caliber program after Calhoun's retirement and APR mess (once again, thanks to Hathaway). I think Ollie was the best hire to restore UCONN basketball. It's a shame that UCONN has to prove itself all over again but it does. Ollie is a UCONN guy and loves the school and he will bust his tail to win. He also has pull with former Huskies who can help him in restoring/continuing the proud tradition.

Personally, I think UCONN will be in the B1G in the next 3-5 years. I think Rutgers was added first simply because of market and football recruiting location. The B1G's goal is to gain NYC eyeballs. Adding UCONN would give them more NYC access, as well as exposure in Boston and locking in our own #31 market where there is no competition of other college or professional sports. Adding UCONN BB could also bode well for scheduling future basketball events (perhaps a conference tournament?) in NYC. But UCONN has some work to do first: get closer to AAU, increase endowment, win football games and draw fans, and consistently show MBB can win post-Calhoun.

Fellas, fellas, fellas... don't anyone worry about the size of our football stadium or where it's located. When I win Warren Buffets $1B for a perfect bracket in a couple of months, I will personally sit down with SH and WM to talk about renaming our football stadium "The Boneyard" and moving it to Storrs.
 
Fellas, fellas, fellas... don't anyone worry about the size of our football stadium or where it's located. When I win Warren Buffets $1B for a perfect bracket in a couple of months, I will personally sit down with SH and WM to talk about renaming our football stadium "The Boneyard" and moving it to Storrs.

I have the same daydream if I won this thing or MegaMillions. UCONN would have a new 65,000 on-campus football stadium in the design similar to Quest Field to capitalize acoustics. WIth whatever is leftover, Gampel would get a facelift and an expansion and the rest would go into the endowment.
 
I have the same daydream if I won this thing or MegaMillions. UCONN would have a new 65,000 on-campus football stadium in the design similar to Quest Field to capitalize acoustics. WIth whatever is leftover, Gampel would get a facelift and an expansion and the rest would go into the endowment.

you gonna fund the access road to get 65K people to and from the stadium too?
 
you gonna fund the access road to get 65K people to and from the stadium too?

If I win Warren Buffet's $1B, I'm going to build rails that go from Hartford to Storrs. There will also be a direct line from my house to Storrs.
 
If I win Warren Buffet's $1B, I'm going to build rails that go from Hartford to Storrs. There will also be a direct line from my house to Storrs.

really? I'm going to build a Star Trek transporter pad that goes from my house right to my seat, and I'm going to create cheerleader androids that bring me my beer during the game.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,291
Messages
4,561,636
Members
10,455
Latest member
UConnGabby


Top Bottom