Sigh. Well, there's 5 minutes of my life I'll never get back.
So because I find the results on the field, more important than the type of offense, I am voluntarily apologizing for the coach? Because I'm satisfied with multiple championships, bowl games, and a bcs bid, then I am voluntarily apologizing for the lack of personality or access to the program?
In order to come to that conclusion Nan, you need me to accept your premise that a defense of the coach is an apology for something done wrong. But I don't agree with your premise that the lack of top 25 wins is a serious complaint worthy of criticism. I don't believe that I should apologize for his lack of personality. I don't care about his personality, I care about his results. In defending the record, I'm not telling you I'm sorry that you didn't get enough information. I'm not apologizing for the lack of top 25 wins for a coach, who by any other measure, exceeded expectations. In my opinion, your complsints don't warrant an apology, and I don't find them nearly as important as you do. Just because you think they do, doesn't mean anyone who defends him is, by definition, making an apology. The irony of this is, I've been accused of telling people what they should think, when all I'm doing is defending what I think.