Their bread is buttered by creating controversy. Sad because this is most likely just an individual with a bone to pick or upset with events. Personally my vote is with President Herbst.I just tweeted at him that I'm canceling my subscription because of this tweet. Even if true, it's unbecoming to uconn and to the paper. I think the courant forgets where their bread is buttered.
Tell me you're joking. Maybe she posts on the women's board, they don't seem too concerned either.Susan Herbst has been great for academic progress at UConn. In the end, universities are about education, and in that regard, she's done a tremendous job.
Having said that, I've heard from someone who has consistent interactions with Herbst that she just doesn't quite understand the monumental impact of conference realignment. Her attitude has apparently been "the Big East has been a good home for us, we'll continue to do well here." I really hope that she understands it more than she's letting on, but my connection seems pretty confident that she's far more concerned with academics than athletics (as she probably should be). If this is accurate, I blame those around her, especially Warde Manuel, for not making it abundantly clear to her just how crucial this process is for the continued success of the university.
Is Warde the emperor or Suzie? Paralyzed seems to fit both.Re. Warde..the scuttlebutt I'm hearing from people on campus is that while he is a big man with gravitas (Susan's words not mine), the emperor may have no clothes and appears to be a bit paralyzed by all of this.
I keep hearing from credible people that this isn't true. I just don't think she has the right help to guide the institution through this.
The AD didn't even know if he was big enough to make a presentation to the ACC. His words, not mine.
I mean really!? Jurich drank his milkshake.
So if she adds hundreds of millions to the endowment and somehow can't convince people that have some cockeyed grudge against us to let them in their conference she somehow fails?
Ok.
I know you guys would be happy if we got a B1G bid by promising to take 0 revenue for 20 years. And I know this sucks. But I'm still of the mindset that this will be worked out in time.
From what I've gathered, she did understand that the ACC would be a better home than the Big East, but ultimately undervalued the difference. Apparently she was under the impression that, though the ACC would lead to greater overall revenues, the next Big East deal would be lucrative to the university as we are a "leader of the Big East".
I've also heard the same about Herbst preferring an "Ivy League" style. In fact, apparently the reason that Ollie hasn't received an extension yet is because they're waiting to receive the players' grades to ensure that "something like the APR fiasco never happens again."
As a college president, it's great that she has such a passion for improving academics, but it seems as though she's seriously undervaluing the importance of athletics.
jaltavilla 7:08pm via TweetDeck
Manuel says #UConn focus must remain on the premise that the school will end up in a "good position." #WTIC #BigEast
I'm just passing along what I've been told by someone in the know. And it's certainly possible to criticize the APR and still want to make marked improvements in academics for the team. Being banned from the postseason based on academics is certainly a black eye for the program, no matter how misguided the APR metric is as an academic measurement tool.This is nearly impossible for me to believe. For one she criticized the APR as a tool for evaluation because it actually lead to anti-academic results (i.e. it took emphasis off graduation and proceeding toward a degree, and toward remaining eligible). Then she instituted 3 mandatory intersession courses in August, and 1 in the Winter. This is not about looking after academics. It's the opposite. I'm not saying I blame her for it since the NCAA demands it. I am saying that Ivy-League level, this is not.
In fact, Harvard basketball didn't make its APR last year. And we know why. There aren't any bogus APR classes at Harvard. Now that is Ivy League.
I'm just passing along what I've been told by someone in the know. And it's certainly possible to criticize the APR and still want to make marked improvements in academics for the team. Being banned from the postseason based on academics is certainly a black eye for the program, no matter how misguided the APR metric is as an academic measurement tool.
Perception is oftentimes viewed as reality. Herbst didn't like the negative press that came along with the postseason ban for low APR scores. It reflects poorly on UConn's academics and thus she instituted the changes to ensure that this doesn't happen again.I'm not sure how I could be any clearer. Her "improvements" were not improvements. She criticized APR, but then she went along with it because she had to. If she were truly being principled about the whole thing, she wouldn't have instituted policies that maximized APR scores at the expense of education.
That right there told me she was putting basketball first, ahead of even what previous administrators at UConn had done, because none of them had ever instituted mandatory short courses like a great many other universities had.
Perception is oftentimes viewed as reality. Herbst didn't like the negative press that came along with the postseason ban for low APR scores. It reflects poorly on UConn's academics and thus she instituted the changes to ensure that this doesn't happen again.
Once again, I'm just passing this information along. Unless Herbst/Manuel are forced to be hush-hush about potentially joining a conference and therefore must be intentionally misleading to the people they interact with, my connection is a pretty reliable source.
Perception is oftentimes viewed as reality. Herbst didn't like the negative press that came along with the postseason ban for low APR scores. It reflects poorly on UConn's academics and thus she instituted the changes to ensure that this doesn't happen again.
I never said she was implementing Ivy League styles at UConn, but that apparently she would prefer college athletics to be more like the Ivy League in her ideal world. In other words, where most of the chatter about universities was about what they were doing academically, and not about their athletic programs.I agree with this, but then you can't say she is instituting Ivy League policies when she is the most aggressive UConn President in terms of downgrading the curriculum for athletes. I mean, she did the exact opposite of what Ivy League schools do. So how is that Ivy League? There's a reason the team's APR scores were jacked up the last few years, despite the fact that so many from those classes never finished their degrees. We'll likely end up with a GSR in the high 75% range from that class, with only Beverly, Okwandu and Kemba graduating. Meanwhile, Oriakhi, Smith, Lamb, Bradley, Jamal Coombs-McDaniel, all gone. And none of them will count against UConn.
I mean..... yes. The postseason ban didn't do the school any good in any area. It would be beneficial to the university in all aspects if we never had anything like this happen again.Couldn't it be that she didn't like the negative affect that getting banned from the postseason has on a sports program and athletic department? Maybe she wants to make sure that the mass exodus that happened never happens again
I think each of your points is spot onFrom what I've gathered, she did understand that the ACC would be a better home than the Big East, but ultimately undervalued the difference. Apparently she was under the impression that, though the ACC would lead to greater overall revenues, the next Big East deal would be lucrative to the university as we are a "leader of the Big East".
I've also heard the same about Herbst preferring an "Ivy League" style. In fact, apparently the reason that Ollie hasn't received an extension yet is because they're waiting to receive the players' grades to ensure that "something like the APR fiasco never happens again."
As a college president, it's great that she has such a passion for improving academics, but it seems as though she's seriously undervaluing the importance of athletics.
I just tweeted at him that I'm canceling my subscription because of this tweet. Even if true, it's unbecoming to uconn and to the paper. I think the courant forgets where their bread is buttered.
I never said she was implementing Ivy League styles at UConn, but that apparently she would prefer college athletics to be more like the Ivy League in her ideal world. In other words, where most of the chatter about universities was about what they were doing academically, and not about their athletic programs.
I don't disagree with the bolded sentiment. However, just based on what I've been told, supposedly Herbst does not fully realize the implications of conference realignment. It's Warde Manuel's job to inform her of this, but it doesn't seem as though he quite understands it fully himself.I'm not trying to be contentious but I'd imagine 99% of the BCS Presidents would want the same thing. I really don't see any evidence that she is an outlier in terms of her attitude toward athletics.
Christopher Keating @chrispkeating
Insider on UConn in Big East w/ teams bailing out: "Susan Herbst is over her head. This is a total mess. She don't know what's going on.''
Well this can't be great news..