Yes he (and the other true freshman, namely SJ) performed appropriate to his (their) experience and highlighted how capable our coaching staff is at developing strength, mental toughness and defense.
If Hawk and Samson take the same developmental leaps that Adama and AJ took from Freshman to Sophomores we're a top 25 team with final four upside based on the talent of those 4 players alone.
The upside will come down to ball handling, how well our transfers gel and just how much defense and rebounding toughness we lost with the departure of Whaley, Martin and Cole.
Yes, and I'll get the usual response for working in Samson here. My argument has been along these lines.
Samson played 68 minutes. He didn't do much. He was behind Whaley (5th year), Akok (3rd year) and even Polley (5th year) who all played the 4. He's somewhat new to the game compared to American kids. We didn't really need him at the 4, and what minutes he did get mostly came as a backup 5, where his lack of strength was exposed on defense. He's added a lot of muscle since.
Hawkins played 398 minutes. He had some glaring problems in his game in the first 68+ minutes he played (despite the critical effort vs Auburn). But he had only Martin in front of him, and Martin played the 3 at times, so we needed Hawk to play. Needed the shooting. Over the course of the 330 extra minutes he played, he got a lot better, especially on defense. He still struggled to score from 2pt in league play, he too, needed to get stronger, and did.
I see no reason why Johnson wouldn't similarly improve, or even more so.