- Joined
- Sep 16, 2011
- Messages
- 53,678
- Reaction Score
- 198,076
The point is winning national titles and the ACC and Big East are the best at it.Again, best team. Teams #2-5 rarely made the Elite 8, many cases didn't even reach the second weekend.
The point is winning national titles and the ACC and Big East are the best at it.Again, best team. Teams #2-5 rarely made the Elite 8, many cases didn't even reach the second weekend.
Keep holding to that.What you're describing is 100% against the rules going forward. This was the last year of unfettered NIL. That's over starting next year.
Unfortunately the NCAA will get sued again and lose due to antitrust violations. The only solution is collective bargaining - like NFL and NBA. I believe only way that works is to make revenue sport players employees.What you're describing is 100% against the rules going forward. This was the last year of unfettered NIL. That's over starting next year.
They don’t have to. They won’t get kicked out of their conferences and they get the revenue regardlessDo you realize how expensive it is to be competitive in football? Have you noticed that half the P4 isn't trying anymore?
Nah. I think the courts got the O'Bannon case wrong, but they aren't likely to take this much further. There's no legitimate antitrust violation here. Trying to squeeze any more for players is going to kill the golden goose. NIL regulations will hold up. Kids like Paige Bueckers or Livvy Dunne will be able to make lots of money. Some unknown player won't.Unfortunately the NCAA will get sued again and lose due to antitrust violations. The only solution is collective bargaining - like NFL and NBA. I believe only way that works is to make revenue sport players employees.
I disagree but we will see soon enough since state attorney generals have filed on behalf of their state colleges on any restrictions NCAA tries to force on their State colleges. You will see the same thing when the independent agency rules against an athlete that the payment he received was not “true” NIL. Here is Justice Kavanaugh thoughts on the matter.Nah. I think the courts got the O'Bannon case wrong, but they aren't likely to take this much further. There's no legitimate antitrust violation here. Trying to squeeze any more for players is going to kill the golden goose. NIL regulations will hold up. Kids like Paige Bueckers or Livvy Dunne will be able to make lots of money. Some unknown player won't.
The NIL case was pretty obvious, and was really triggered by social media earnings. Basically the NCAA can't tell a kid who can make money off of their name that they lose eligibility if they do. They can absolutely enforce rules against illegitimate payments to players.
So what is the fix?While I think this is partly a down year, I do think the SEC poses a new threat with their stable of coaches, huge fan bases and overall appeal. It's part of a larger trend of kids from the metro areas of the north heading to big schools in the south and midwest. Not just athletes. The other factor is that the best players of the peak Big East era were from NY, NJ, Philly, Chicago, Baltimore, LA, maybe North Carolina and Indiana. Now, look at where the top kids are from. Nate Ament is a good example, 20 years ago, there is no way he picks Tennessee over Georgetown or UVA or UNC. Now Georgetown doesn't even try. London Jemison is from Bloomfield and goes to Alabama. Football player at my daughter's former HS in MA is headed to Mississippi.
Nailed it - these inner city kids are now going to academies and acclimating to a different environment that they like. There is an allure to the big cultures and climates of these big schools. And in the case of the SEC, it’s warmer too.While I think this is partly a down year, I do think the SEC poses a new threat with their stable of coaches, huge fan bases and overall appeal. It's part of a larger trend of kids from the metro areas of the north heading to big schools in the south and midwest. Not just athletes. The other factor is that the best players of the peak Big East era were from NY, NJ, Philly, Chicago, Baltimore, LA, maybe North Carolina and Indiana. Now, look at where the top kids are from. Nate Ament is a good example, 20 years ago, there is no way he picks Tennessee over Georgetown or UVA or UNC. Now Georgetown doesn't even try. London Jemison is from Bloomfield and goes to Alabama. Football player at my daughter's former HS in MA is headed to Mississippi.
And Butler isn’t all that badTo me, this is a Butler and Seton Hall issue. If those two got back to what they were in the 2010s, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
And it makes it easier for the big boys since there is less competitionThey don’t have to. They won’t get kicked out of their conferences and they get the revenue regardless
There is no fix. The urban private colleges are becoming less attractive generally, aside from the top schools. This is a good article about the demographic changes. Fewer students, more of the student pool coming from the south and southwest, more focus on STEM or business not liberal arts, more focus on cost. It talks about Connecticut, using New Canaan as an example. Yes, basketball players can ignore cost, but the appeal of the big public schools is still stronger. Georgetown and Villanova will be fine.So what is the fix?
Maybe not. The Networks are scraping for content and a reason to bleed Consumers dry with subscriptions. If Uconn leaves it might be a cause for concern, but unless the current administration plans to overhaul the FCC. and adds additional regulations, which has not been their M.O., there will be room to feed on a new dealJust wait until the basketball TV contract is up for renewal. Things will get worse. The rich will get richer.
The tournament will most likely expand and the power conferences will get more teams in at higher seeds. That will most likely lead to a tiered unit structure that benefits them
The NCAA is poorly managed and needs congressional oversight in my opinion.
The football powers have highjacked college sports to meet their needs.
They don’t have to. They won’t get kicked out of their conferences and they get the revenue regardless
The Big 10 is talking about unequal revenue sharing. So they may not get kicked out, but the may see their share decrease.
Sacred Heart High School? I'm talking about high schools here, not universities.Schools like Sacred Heart have absolutely blown up - that went from nothing to what looks like a city meets country club now, bought out the GE HQ, a golf course and anything they can get their hands on.
That makes them not bad?And Butler isn’t all that bad
Lost a close one on road at SMU
No, I'm talking about the university in Fairfield. I'm very much aware that the high school institutions are consolidating/shrinking. There may have just been too many of them.Sacred Heart High School? I'm talking about high schools here, not universities.
SMU is going to be decent this year. Not a terrible loss. Would have been a good winThat makes them not bad?
sactownsports.com
There was an article in the Boston Globe recently about his.UConn got 3 or 4 , so did UNH and UMass, some at BC, Villanova, Marquette, Northeastern (including mine), BU etc. But the number of fairly well off private school kids in metro Boston heading to SEC and southern ACC schools is vastly different than it was a decade ago
Same in our NJ hood....I see Alabama and TN flags...and some B1G flags too. I knew someone that went to a very good HS, had good grades and couldn't get into FSU! Only 1 Nova flag....that hasn't flown recently lolSure, my daughter went to one in suburban Boston. Two of her classmates (who I coached in basketball in elementary school) went to Auburn. Six went to Clemson. Three to Tennessee. Three to U South Carolina. Purdue, Alabama, Georgia Tech, WVU, Ole Miss and more. The best football player at that school right now is headed to Mississippi (Logan Mankins' son).
UConn got 3 or 4 , so did UNH and UMass, some at BC, Villanova, Marquette, Northeastern (including mine), BU etc. But the number of fairly well off private school kids in metro Boston heading to SEC and southern ACC schools is vastly different than it was a decade ago.