Now that I've had a chance to digest the last couple of SC games, I may be changing my sense of where they may be going this year. Up til now, we've all noticed their depth and athleticism, and this has led us to understand that they don't have a great scorer. Joyce could be one, as could Milaysia, but there's caveats with them. And Chloe is a capable scorer, and Te-Hina is a solid perimeter scorer, and Tessa is clutch. Depth is what makes up for the lack of any standout scorer, and there athleticism is what generate that awesome defense. This is why I still think of them as the most likely to win the title, with ND and UCLA as the next most likely.
But I'm beginning to wonder how much depth SC really has after the Tennessee game. They won the game even though it was closer than Dawn may have liked at the end. And the reason Dawn gave for Tennessee's late run was "fatigue." That's a flashing red light for me. Dawn surely knew they were tired in the 4th but apparently couldn't find a group to put on the floor that would solve the fatigue problem.
Looking at the SC roster again, what I see is a rotation of 7 + Milaysia. Yes, McDaniel is good for a few minutes, but she doesn't strike me a a go to player in a pinch. And after her, and without Watkins, it's just the 3 bench warming bigs, Walker Dauda and Tac.
That first 7 is a formidable lineup and I can't picture a lot of teams that could stand up to them. And Milaysia could be great too, but she is currently not all that great. 7 doesn't strike me as great depth, but in the 4th quarter they got tired. They are very athletic, but in the tournament, this could be a vulnerability, though the only teams who might be able to exploit it have to be able to score against that defense, or at least prevent them from blowing the game out before the 4th quarter.
Also, if Tac Dauda and Walker can't contribute in crunch time, then SC is a significantly smaller team than most of us are used to seeing. SC's big are athletic enough to make it hard for UCLA's guards to get the ball into Betts, as they did in November. Then it's a matter of UCLA's guards not caving to SC's defense and vice versa. They didn't last time. This is where the battle will be in a rematch.
I think something similar is possible for ND. Their bigs are bigger, but not as athletic as SC's. But their guards are as athletic as any team's and they all are talented scorers. They should be able to shoot ND past either SC or UCLA on a good night. And if SC can be worn down over the course of a game, Hannah and Olivia are the pair to do it.
I don't know if UConn can beat SC, and if we can it may not be in this first meeting. But we aren't the only team that should take heart from the Tennessee game. What would it take for us to win. Great shooting, great defense, and good rebounding.