UMass Amherst is a good school and I know lots of good smart people who went there.My stepsister went to UMass and is doing well. None of us know why she went there.
The ahol3 who wrote that article even threw in a dig at UConn. These clowns don't know what's coming. Baylor is screwed. No one is going to touch them.Only after we put them through a very public dog-and-pony show. They can stay at the Days Inn in East Hartford.
Has anyone ever met an actual Umass fan?
Baylor can rot in hell. Speaking of hell, Art Briles.The ahol3 who wrote that article even threw in a dig at UConn. These clowns don't know what's coming. Baylor is screwed. No one is going to touch them.
One of the few good points this article makes is the B12's grant of rights becomes almost meaningless if enough teams leave that the league must dissolve. If OU and UT leave, they're one move away from that. The author correctly points out that every other B12 member would be wise to not sit around and monitor the situation and instead find the nearest lifeboat.Baylor thinking about Big East. Not Plan A, but they know they won't get their Plan A.
Why I think the Big 12 is going to collapse, and how Baylor should react
We could be headed for major changeswww.ourdailybears.com
UMass is thinking of the AAC.UMass Amherst is a good school and I know lots of good smart people who went there.
That doesn't make it a worthwhile addition to any conference.
UMass Amherst is a good school and I know lots of good smart people who went there.
That doesn't make it a worthwhile addition to any conference.
Yes, but UMass has no brand equity at all. I just can't see them as comparable.UMass has a huge alumni base in a wealthy state. And they are rising rapidly in academics.
Basically, anyone arguing against UMass is also arguing against UConn. The case for both schools is the same. Terrible football combined with wealthy states, big markets, and large alumni bases. UConn has better basketball, UMass has more alumni.
Yes, but UMass has no brand equity at all. I just can't see them as comparable.
It’s a done deal. The Aggies leaked it to the Houston Chronicle in a ham handed effort to derail it. No one else in SEC will vote against the move.Yes, there is no way any of this goes public unless all the votes are lined up.A&M has to go public for their fans to show they didn't just roll over but no one has any expectation of A&M being the program that stirs the SEC's drink.
The Big East is a great basketball league with Villanova, Georgetown and Creighton, so Baylor could keep it rolling in hoops.Baylor thinking about Big East. Not Plan A, but they know they won't get their Plan A.
Why I think the Big 12 is going to collapse, and how Baylor should react
We could be headed for major changeswww.ourdailybears.com
You must not live in Eastern Massachusetts like I do. In the Boston area, nobody cares about UMass and they don’t get great support from the legislature. The support for UConn in Connecticut is light years ahead of UMass in Massachusetts. That was even the case before UConn went to the BE in the late 70s.UMass has a huge alumni base in a wealthy state. And they are rising rapidly in academics.
Basically, anyone arguing against UMass is also arguing against UConn. The case for both schools is the same. Terrible football combined with wealthy states, big markets, and large alumni bases. UConn has better basketball, UMass has more alumni.
The Big XII is going to implode regardless and I can't wait to see it. Hope TCU and Baylor get stuck in the AAC
Sorry. Total irrelevance.Lol... Squeeze BCU into irrelevance? Where have you been the last 20 years.
#trollbetter
Mmm, same answer.Sorry. Total irrelevance.
The point is you start pumping $40 Mill a year into UMass and UConn from BIG revenue share, the whole market is transformed and people start paying attention. BC becomes a non-entity along with Cuse. UConn, UMass and Ruterds control the New England/Tristate Market with natural rivalries and bring in Midwest B1G teams fuels the fire.You must not live in Eastern Massachusetts like I do. In the Boston area, nobody cares about UMass and they don’t get great support from the legislature. The support for UConn in Connecticut is light years ahead of UMass in Massachusetts. That was even the case before UConn went to the BE in the late 70s.
I agree... you do it for the money.It's the money.
True and by the same logic if we started pumping $40M into your finances, you'd be a millionaire. Of course the problem is finding someone who is willing to do that.The point is you start pumping $40 Mill a year into UMass and UConn from BIG revenue share, the whole market is transformed and people start paying attention. BC becomes a non-entity along with Cuse. UConn, UMass and Ruterds control the New England/Tristate Market with natural rivalries and bring in Midwest B1G teams fuels the fire.
I agree... you do it for the money.
I guess my point was...in the past... realignment meant if UConn didn't land in a P5 conference...then they were stuck in the AAC. Now....if UConn once again ends up without a chair...they still have the BE for most sports and I like the indie schedule for football.
The situation doesn't feel as dire.
Money train from Portland....? I'm sure the networks are salivating.Still think the B1G picking up UConn is a smart move to lock down the northeast. In fact, if they took UMass, the two would dominate recruiting and squeeze BC into irrelevance. The result would be capturing the money train from Portland to NYC . It would make fir a powerful regional trivalent with eyes.