Holly Warlick set to receive contract extension | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Holly Warlick set to receive contract extension

bballnut90

LV Adherent. Topic Crafter
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
7,388
Reaction Score
32,987
Holly has an adversion of her players taking 3pt shots, unless it's a situation 3pt shooter like Dunbar. I heard an commentator during one of Tennessee's games said that Holly doesn't like her players taking 3pt shots. Tennessee's offense consists of having the players sprint down the court after getting a defensive rebound, dumping the ball in the post to Russell, and either driving to the basket or shooting an off balance shot as the clock winds down when they failed to get the ball to Russell.

This isn’t 1980 anymore. Three point shooters are a must for any team that wants to compete for a title. Players like Dunbar who are completely one dimensional aren’t going to make a difference. You need players who can hold their own on the court and hit outside shots. Look at the 4 Final Four teams this year...all 4 has exceptional long range shooters. Pat’s teams always recruited strong perimeter shooters and usually had multiple threats from deep. I’m not sure what Holly’s logic is there.
 

meyers7

You Talkin’ To Me?
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
23,515
Reaction Score
60,890
This isn’t 1980 anymore. Three point shooters are a must for any team that wants to compete for a title. Players like Dunbar who are completely one dimensional aren’t going to make a difference. You need players who can hold their own on the court and hit outside shots. Look at the 4 Final Four teams this year...all 4 has exceptional long range shooters. Pat’s teams always recruited strong perimeter shooters and usually had multiple threats from deep. I’m not sure what Holly’s logic is there.
LOL. Holly. Logic. :D
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
593
Reaction Score
2,034
giphy.gif


All joking aside, she deserves it. I know some LVol fans delusionally think they should be FF locks almost every year, but the fact is that she's been recruiting gangbusters and the administration really needs to see what she can do with the plethora of talent she's amassed recently.

Frankly I think making occasional elite 8 or sweet 16 appearances should pretty much guarantee her extensions even beyond that...
I guess I just don't see it the same way! Yes she surely does an excellent job recruiting. But that's only part of the job.
From everything I've observed she's at best an average coach. She doesn't seem to have either a strong offensive or defensive game plan. Her in and especially end of the game strategic coaching leaves a great deal to be desired.
If they are satisfied at U Tenn with an occasional elite 8 or sweet sixteen that's both shocking and sad, and then sure keep her. Especially with the talent she has brought in.
We will face some of these same issues when Geno & CD retire. I expect there has to be a drop down but hopefully it's somewhere between where U Tenn is now and where U Conn is now.
Bronx23
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
593
Reaction Score
2,034
Congrats. It's what Pat would have wanted. The fans of programs like Tennessee and UConn need to get used to the idea that they aren't going to be able to win 100 games in a row or half of the championships anymore. There's simply too much talent to go around now unlike even ten years ago.
Everything you said makes sense but the drop off from Pat to Holly over more than a few years now I think could be avoided.
Hopefully U Conn can choose the right coach to remain highly competitive. I'm thinking it will be Shea Ralph.
Bronx23
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
593
Reaction Score
2,034
I call BS.....she put together a very good class in 2017 and has a slew of midrange players for 2018, but it's hardly a gangbuster class despite what a lot of Tennessee fans are hoping for. She essentially struck out in 2015 and 2016, plus she has no verbals for 2019 yet. She has a very lopsided team headed for next year....we have three highly rated PGs, no highly rated posts, and no consistent perimeter shooters. I'd much rather her take smaller classes where players actually fit roles that are needed for the team.

Also worth noting, Tennessee is not a hard place to recruit to. They have better facilities, fan support, tradition, exposure and recognition than almost anyone else in the country. It isn't like Holly is recruiting all of these top players to a no name school. So many of the top kids who come to Tennessee have mentioned that it's been a lifelong dream to play for the program. They'd still be coming to Tennessee if a different coach were leading the charge. Tennessee for years was the gold standard in women's basketball, and players like Candace Parker and Tamika Catchings were/are two the most popular professional players in the world. I'm confident that anybody who Tennessee would hire to replace Holly could do a comparable or better job recruiting.



Aside from recruiting, Holly has badly underperformed in virtually every other coaching measure, including preseason team expectations, player development, handling the duties as head coach and overall eye test.

Team expectations: Look at the steady decline in results as well as how Tennessee has fared relative to preseason expectations:
2013: Preseason #20 and 4th in SEC. Finished in the Elite 8 with a #2 seed, won the SEC regular season. By far her best season in regards to overachieving. Team was severely underestimated in preseason due to lots of graduating seniors and Pat's retirement. Earned a relatively easy draw into the Elite 8 where they lost to #5 seed Louisville. Best tournament win was on the road against a #6 seed Oklahoma. Holly's best season. Most fans (including myself) were quite pleased with results.

2014: Preseason #4 and 1st in the SEC. Finished in the Sweet 16 as a 1 seed, won the SEC Tournament Championship and finished 2nd in the regular season. Not a bad year by any means, but Tennessee was blown out by Maryland in the Sweet 16 which left a bad taste in many fans mouths. Overall the team underachieved considering high expectations coming into the season. Not a bad season though.

2015 results: Preseason #4 and #2 in the SEC. Finished 30-6, #2 seed, Elite 8 finish, co-SEC Champions.....another year that didn't end in a Final Four but wasn't a bad year overall considering the loss of Harrison midseason and there's no shame in losing in the Elite 8. Tennessee did have an easy path to an Elite 8, facing a 15 seed, 10 seed, and 11 seed before losing to Maryland. They needed a 4th quarter miracle to force OT against the 11 seed in the Sweet 16 after trailing by double digits in the 4th. Their best tournament win was against a 10 seed, Pitt, in the 2nd round. Tennessee did finish lower than expectations once again.

2016 results: Preseason #4 in the country and #2 in the SEC. Finished 22-14, 7th in the SEC, #7 seed in the NCAA tournament, Elite 8 finish....this was arguably the most disappointing season under Holly. A team that was preseason #4 entered the tournament not ranked in the top 25, lost 14 games and finished with an 8-8 record in the SEC. The post season success was the only bright spot of the year, but Tennessee on paper had more talent than anyone in the country besides Connecticut this season (who went undefeated), yet the LVs were barely a top 25 team.

2017 results: Preseason #13/14 in the country and #3 in the SEC. Finished 20-12, 5th in the SEC, #5 seed in the NCAA tournament, 2nd round finish. Despite lower expectations, Tennessee still managed to underachieve, finishing the year out of the top 25 once again and losing in the 2nd round as expected.


2018 results: Preseason #13/18 in the country and #5 in the SEC. Finished 25-8, T4 in the SEC (#7 seed in tournament), #3 seed in NCAA tournament, 2nd round finish. Tennessee lost at home in the tournament for the 1st time ever and likely would've had 10 losses if they didn't luck into playing SC twice without A'ja Wilson. Underachieving wasn't as bad as the last 2 years, but after a strong start against a cupcake preseason schedule, Tennessee finished the year 10-8 in their last 18 games.

So in summary, you have 1 year of overachieving, 3 years of underachieving, and 2 years of badly underachieving.

Player Development:
She has not had 1 WBCA All American in her 6 years at Tennessee despite having the following top recruits come through Tennessee:
#1 recruit Mercedes Russell, no AA honors, never made 1st Team All-SEC, projected as 2nd round draft pick
#2 recruit Evina Westbrook, 1 year under her belt...made SEC All Freshman team
#3 recruit Diamond Deshields, no AA honors, made All-SEC, played 2 seasons and then quit. Projected as top 5 draft pick.
#3 recruit Cierra Burdick, no AA honors, made All-SEC(1st and 2nd team) as a senior, #14 pick in the draft
#4 recruit Ariel Massengale, no AA honors, never made All-SEC, #29 draft pick
#5 recruit Bashaara Graves, no AA honors, NFOY over Breanna Stewart and Jewell Loyd, named All-SEC 1st/2nd Team as a freshman and then didn't make an All-SEC team again until she made 2nd team as a senior. #22 draft pick.
#6 recruit Jaime Nared, no AA honors, All-SEC as a senior (1st and 2nd team), 2nd team All-SEC as a junior. Projected as a 2nd round draft pick.
#7 recruit Anastasia Hayes, 1 year under her belt...named SEC 6th Woman of the year
#8 recruit Jannah Tucker, played 1 year and transferred


Other top 30 recruits under Holly:
#13 recruit Taber Spani...played 1 season, didn't make it in the pros
#12 recruit Te'a Cooper....transferred after a disappointing freshman campaign
#24 recruit Meighan Simmons...never improved after a strong freshman season under Pat. Hasn't been able to stick in the pros
#21 recruit, Andraya Carter...never lived up to expectations and retired early
#29 recruit, Alexa Middleton...never was a strong contributor, transferred after junior season
#29 recruit, Isabelle Harrison....the only success story under Holly. Made great strides in college and has had a productive pro career.
#12 recruit Rennia Davis....played 1 season so far, SEC All-Freshman team


Out of all that talent, we've had a grand total of 1 successful pro player in Isabelle Harrison. I'm not sure we can even take credit for Diamond if she goes pro considering she transferred in and quit before using up her eligibility.


Head Coaching Duties:
Regularly in press conferences, Holly seems confused and unable to articulate what went wrong. She commonly says phrases similar to, "I told them to do this and they didn't listen" and never takes blame or comes up with valid reasons for what went wrong. A coach in her position needs to have better public speaking skills and she needs to be able to articulate what went wrong when her teams routinely lose to less talented teams.

Holly does not hold her players accountable or demand their best efforts. You never see her call out individual players in press conferences, bench players who put forth poor efforts, and most of all she seems to lack any backbone.

When Diamond Deshields quit, Holly immaturely post a smiley face on Twitter before deleting the post and then deleting her Twitter all together. What other head coach have you seen pull a similar stunt? I don't care how much she disliked Diamond or had issues with her, it is incredibly immature to post anything along those lines on social media. As the head coach of one of the most followed programs in the country, Holly should know how to handle this better.

Eye Test:
Here is the biggest issue IMO. Even in her best years, none of her teams ever looked like they could compete for a championship. They simply have never looked like a true Final Four team or title contender. More over, every year this team gets worse. This board has always roasted Tennessee, even during our championship years, but anyone can see the quality of play has declined immensely the last 4-5 years. Once in a while we get some spurts of great basketball (2018 Notre Dame first half, 2016 Sweet 16 vs. Ohio State), but overall the lack of effort put forth by Tennessee players has been noticeable since Holly took over. You rarely see anyone give 100%, you don't see players scrapping for loose balls or crashing the glass like players did under Pat. Holly has also not been able to figure out how to break a zone defense in the last 3 years. I am unsure why any coach would play anything BUT zone against Tennessee when they've had zero outside shooting and almost all of their offense comes in the paint or in the midrange game. On offense there are zero picks set, and plays are not run. Everything is jam the ball inside to Russell even if it's not there. If she's taking the play off and isn't posting, pass the ball around on the perimeter and have a perimeter player go one on one and settle for a tough jumper late in the shot clock. Or drive to the basket and hope for a foul. Pat was never an offensive mastermind, but her teams played much better offense than Holly's do, and her players always gave best effort so Tennessee regularly had 2nd and 3rd opportunities if they didn't get a good look on the first try.


Next year unless something massive changes, we are going to be a borderline top 25 team IMO. We have zero proven post players, even highly touted ones. This is the first time in my lifetime that Tennessee is going to have 0 top 5 post players on the roster. Tennessee's strength as a program has always been in having strong forwards and centers. We don't have any next year unless we play Davis primarily as a post.

Our guards show promise, but Holly is not going to help them improve skills they've struggled with (avoiding turnovers, perimeter shooting, making smart passes, shot selection, running plays, etc). I am hopeful that players will improve, but all results have shown this is unlikely to happen under Holly.

Additionally, more than ever you can see how important quality coaching is in today's landscape. Geno, Muffet, Dawn, Vic, Rueck, Tara etc have all proven year after year that good coaches make good teams and they help their players reach their potential. There's a reason we've consistently seen these coaches competing in the Final Four while we haven't seen coaches like Holly, Mulkey, Aston, McGuff, and McCallie reach Final Fours despite having more than enough talent to compete for championships. It really does come down to coaching, and from everything we've seen the last 6 years, Holly hasn't shown any ability to be a strong coach or leader.
Excellent, detailed analysis!
While I'm a big proponent of loyalty and having given her a real chance, she's had that chance and more!
She's clearly not a quality coach but I do think she has to be given some credit for recruiting, even though yes the Tennessee name and history mean a lot.
Programs and teams can surely get carried away when they have enormous success and then have expectations to replace a Pat, Geno, MM or Tara. It's bordering on impossible for any replacement to reach that level of success. But there hopefully should continue to be high expectations and strong development and preparation of recruits to both excel and for some to reach the next level.
In this case, I think they've overdone the loyalty thing and the respect for Pat issue can cut two ways. I'm sure she'd have wanted Holly to be given every opportunity to excel and run a continuing strong program. What exists now would drive Pat nuts, so to me at least, continuing to slide backwards is actually disrespectful to her memory.
Bronx23
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2018
Messages
439
Reaction Score
800
Holly has an adversion of her players taking 3pt shots, unless it's a situation 3pt shooter like Dunbar. I heard an commentator during one of Tennessee's games said that Holly doesn't like her players taking 3pt shots. Tennessee's offense consists of having the players sprint down the court after getting a defensive rebound, dumping the ball in the post to Russell, and either driving to the basket or shooting an off balance shot as the clock winds down when they failed to get the ball to Russell.
IIRC, the stuff about her not wanting her teams to take 3 point shots was in the context of taking quick 3 point shots before Russell even got an attempt at a touch.
 
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
1,836
Reaction Score
3,793
Tennessee is incredible.... after 30 years as asst coach, a year as head coach filling in for Pat, and 6 years now running her own show.... the AD is still going with her.... problem is not associated with juxtaposition of her performance and Pat's.... the problem is with her coaching... I can see it... it was clear from the start... and very conspicuous...

If there is something wrong in the machinery, when is the best time to fix it? Now... I understand the thing about recruiting..... but this is putting a band aid on a head wound....

not that i am complaining...
 

msf22b

Maestro
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,289
Reaction Score
17,042
I am overjoyed by the thought that the VolNation blowhards heads are exploding today.



. Competition is much stronger, other schools have passed TN in... recruiting... .

Not factual
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
717
Reaction Score
2,063
Congrats. It's what Pat would have wanted. The fans of programs like Tennessee and UConn need to get used to the idea that they aren't going to be able to win 100 games in a row or half of the championships anymore. There's simply too much talent to go around now unlike even ten years ago.
Who cares about winning 100 in a row?
 
Joined
Aug 2, 2015
Messages
4,168
Reaction Score
9,386
The question for me is whether this is a cosmetic extension or whether Tennessee is genuinely committing to her.

I can the argument for either. A lot of departments would be ok with a legacy coach who consistently recruits well and makes the tournament. On the other hand, she does seem to be underachieving and not living up to the past standard.

Still maybe the AD sees Summitt's run as unrealistic for Tennessee in the current era and thinks she is on target to contend seriously here and there.
 

Rocket009

Santa Cruz. CA
Joined
Jun 4, 2014
Messages
869
Reaction Score
3,250
You also have to disagree with ESPN as well which rated UTenn's 2017 class #1 :)

2017 Women's Basketball Class Rankings

No fan of UTenn for sure, but inaccurate assertions bring forth corrections on this board.

That was one year - as others have pointed out on this board, 2015 and 2016 were busts. 2018 is also not shaping up to be a leading recruiting class for them either. Once upon a time, TN got almost anyone they wanted and could pick and choose. That is no longer the case and others are now consistently getting better players.
 

DefenseBB

Snark is always appreciated!
Joined
Nov 10, 2016
Messages
7,978
Reaction Score
29,134
That was one year - as others have pointed out on this board, 2015 and 2016 were busts. 2018 is also not shaping up to be a leading recruiting class for them either. Once upon a time, TN got almost anyone they wanted and could pick and choose. That is no longer the case and others are now consistently getting better players.
Never let the facts get in the way of a good thread as Mark Twain always said (I know @bags27 will give us the true quote and origination), but your comments are not correct:
2013 Tennessee was ranked #3 with 3 recruits
2014 ranked #6 with 3 recruits
2015 ranked #13 with 2 recruits
2016 whiff
2017 ranked #1 with 4 recruits
2018 ranked #5/6 with 4 recruits.

Due to the miss in 2016, and the low number of recruits in 2015 (2) the numbers had to be upped the last to years (4 each) to fill out the roster. So ranking 3, 6, 13, -, 1, 5 seems to me to be pretty freakin good. I have put a snap shot of all the usual suspect. When a program didn't make Top 20, I used the number 20 to help get an average. There were some one hit wonders like UCLA, North Cheat, SC and Oregon. So as you can see, Tenn is fitting in well with the top programs. How to define success as Conference placement or NCAA results or developing All-Americans is subjective and is the indication of actual coaching. So for coaching criteria, my assessment from would be UConn, ND and Stanford shine. Louisville, Maryland and Baylor are next and Texas, Tenn and Duke fill in after that.

upload_2018-4-13_11-45-9.png
 

HuskyNan

You Know Who
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
25,900
Reaction Score
213,557
Never let the facts get in the way of a good thread as Mark Twain always said (I know @bags27 will give us the true quote and origination), but your comments are not correct:
2013 Tennessee was ranked #3 with 3 recruits
2014 ranked #6 with 3 recruits
2015 ranked #13 with 2 recruits
2016 whiff
2017 ranked #1 with 4 recruits
2018 ranked #5/6 with 4 recruits.

Due to the miss in 2016, and the low number of recruits in 2015 (2) the numbers had to be upped the last to years (4 each) to fill out the roster. So ranking 3, 6, 13, -, 1, 5 seems to me to be pretty freakin good. I have put a snap shot of all the usual suspect. When a program didn't make Top 20, I used the number 20 to help get an average. There were some one hit wonders like UCLA, North Cheat, SC and Oregon. So as you can see, Tenn is fitting in well with the top programs. How to define success as Conference placement or NCAA results or developing All-Americans is subjective and is the indication of actual coaching. So for coaching criteria, my assessment from would be UConn, ND and Stanford shine. Louisville, Maryland and Baylor are next and Texas, Tenn and Duke fill in after that.

View attachment 30646
That doesn’t take into account #1/3 (depending on ratings service) Diamond DeShields who transferred in. Tenn had at least 2 top 5 players on the roster for 2 years (DeShields and Russell).
 

Online statistics

Members online
301
Guests online
1,788
Total visitors
2,089

Forum statistics

Threads
159,560
Messages
4,195,761
Members
10,066
Latest member
bardira


.
Top Bottom