- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 9,380
- Reaction Score
- 23,680
I don't know much about the topic, so I want to give other people a chance to inform me, but to my eye it looks like Herbst took over at UConn right around the time the athletic department had reached its apex. Is that not directly related to the academic profile of a school or are there more consequential variables that I am missing?
You win a Big East title in football. Then you win a title in 2011. Then you win another one in 2014. All this time the women's program is the best in the country by far and state schools have become more attractive, particularly amongst Connecticut residents, for the typical student.
Did the leg work for this rise occur on Herbst's watch or somebody else's? And if the answer is the latter, then who's doing the leg work now for the inevitable come down? It sounds great to celebrate the growth of the school, because that is in fact the ultimate goal, but if the reason that growth occurred in the first place was because of athletics then what does that say about where we are now?
You win a Big East title in football. Then you win a title in 2011. Then you win another one in 2014. All this time the women's program is the best in the country by far and state schools have become more attractive, particularly amongst Connecticut residents, for the typical student.
Did the leg work for this rise occur on Herbst's watch or somebody else's? And if the answer is the latter, then who's doing the leg work now for the inevitable come down? It sounds great to celebrate the growth of the school, because that is in fact the ultimate goal, but if the reason that growth occurred in the first place was because of athletics then what does that say about where we are now?