Does anyone think this action may prompt the ACC to seriously consider inviting Conn?
Does anyone think this action may prompt the ACC to seriously consider inviting Conn?
Uh oh - not addressed to the Big 12's law office.
What does it mean?! Did Susan just not follow directions?
Memphis' letter to Bowlsby requesting an invitation to the B12 just surfaced, so I guess they're in the game too.
No spelling errors. UCONN 1, USF 0.![]()
Jake Trotter @Jake_Trotter 34m34 minutes ago
Obtained copy of letter UConn's prez sent Big 12 on July 25 expressing the school’s “strong interest” in membership
Does anyone think this action may prompt the ACC to seriously consider inviting Conn?
Here's Cinci Letter for reference:
View attachment 15132
No spelling errors. UCONN 1, USF 0.
Please have your team to direct.....
English can be a 2nd language for me, but it sounds wrong.
I don't know how to interpret Cincy and Houston directing their interests to the Big 12's law firm and Uconn sending it directly to Bowlsby, but it is a bit bizarre.Wait, I thought the administration was asleep at the switch again with pina colada in hand...![]()
I don't know how to interpret Cincy and Houston directing their interests to the Big 12's law firm and Uconn sending it directly to Bowlsby, but it is a bit bizarre.
Good to see that the "confidential" mark on the letter means alot
Given that Cincy and Houston are considered favorites I might feel better if our process was the same. Let's hope ECU didn't send their letter directly to Bowlsby.I was just puzzling over this at dinner. Two possibilities: 1.) UCONN out of loop and thus the deviation from instructions, or 2.) UCONN has a personal back door into the process.
Figure that one out, and we know our fate.
I don't know how to interpret Cincy and Houston directing their interests to the Big 12's law firm and Uconn sending it directly to Bowlsby, but it is a bit bizarre.
We are ahead of Cincy, too. Their president told Commissioner Bowlsby "have your team to direct inquiries to..."
Why?The second possibility doesn't make a whole lot of sense,
They either knew something she didn't know at that time, which is troubling, or she was specifically told she could send the letter directly, which would be encouraging if true. The second possibility doesn't make a whole lot of sense, though, because they'd want the process to be uniform. However, they can't fault her for sending it directly if there had been no communication from them about how to proceed.
It's absolutely wrong. You don't have your team to direct inquiries to... You just have them direct inquiries to...