Waquoit
Mr. Positive
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 33,731
- Reaction Score
- 89,103
This is what talking out of one's ass looks like.That's what I mean. That RI franchise can choose to affiliate itself with the Revs.
This is what talking out of one's ass looks like.That's what I mean. That RI franchise can choose to affiliate itself with the Revs.
Is that this? Can't read it because it's behind a paywall and Outline doesn't work.A bunch of teams fixing to leave the USL. Details emerge for new MLS minor league planned for ’22
Is that this? Can't read it because it's behind a paywall and Outline doesn't work.
MLS to launch development league in 2022
MLS will launch a development-focused league next year, aimed to bridge the gap between youth academies and first-teams, the league has announced.www.espn.com
If it is....this whole country is so backwards when it comes to soccer. It's like it is trying to shoot itself in the foot so it can't successfully grow....
"Oh interest is growing and we seem to see growth in the USL markets!"
MLS: "Stop this! We must not let interest grow in other areas so let's create another league that will diminish interest in all leagues!"
"But that will hurt growth in all soccer interest and growth of players"
MLS: "We don't care!! We just want our money and no one can interfere with us."
SMH.....
Admittedly, I don't know the inside skinny. But I think the USL will be fine. I get the feeling they know what they are doing and indy teams are so much more attractive to a community. Two new USL Championship teams are starting next year within 2 hours of Hartford. They don't need those MLS II teams anymore.MLS wants a minor league structure. That’s not in line with what the USL wants. Dance with the devil...,
If you read, MLS wants minor league teams in markets other than their own. No MLS II team names. Duh.This is what talking out of one's ass looks like.
Actually, the ESPN article said that the new league was going to have these new league teams play at the parent club stadiums. So they actually wouldn't be any new markets. They said that they hope they can expand into new markets after they start up. I believe I read that correctly....If you read, MLS wants minor league teams in markets other than their own. No MLS II team names. Duh.
MLS-operated teams in the new league are expected to play either at the MLS stadium or at a smaller venue in relatively close proximity, as is the case now with the teams playing in USL. Over time, it's possible some MLS teams could choose to base their second team in a different media market in an attempt to expand their reach. I
If you read, MLS wants minor league teams in markets other than their own. No MLS II team names. Duh.
If you read, MLS wants minor league teams in markets other than their own. No MLS II team names. Duh.
If RI agrees to pay $40+ million to build a new stadium that will host 10 games per year of a third division farm team for the Revs then the state should be dissolved. The MLS teams have focused their efforts on cost reduction and shared resources with the parent. Attendance has generally been miserable as it is clear that these are not much more than development academy games with little concern for building a winner. Philadelphia used to have their USL reserve team play in Bethlehem before moving them to Philly (Chester) to save $$. Even the ones that don't share a facility use a lesser stadium in the same market (RB II in Montclair, Loudoun out near Dulles, Tacoma, Salt Lake plays in the parent's training ground, Atlanta plays at a suburban college, etc.). The exception is NYFC and San Antonio, but I don't see much evidence that model will grow. The new league, sanctioned at Division III will undoubtedly continue with MLS cost-controlled, shared resource development model.Actually, the ESPN article said that the new league was going to have these new league teams play at the parent club stadiums. So they actually wouldn't be any new markets. They said that they hope they can expand into new markets after they start up. I believe I read that correctly....
The article even said the same about development vs winning. Saying that USL teams not linked with a MLS club were actually playing to win and be competitive while MLS 2 clubs were not. I'm not sure where MLS sees this league developing somewhere. I think it's going to be a waste but they wanna do them.If RI agrees to pay $40+ million to build a new stadium that will host 10 games per year of a third division farm team for the Revs then the state should be dissolved. The MLS teams have focused their efforts on cost reduction and shared resources with the parent. Attendance has generally been miserable as it is clear that these are not much more than development academy games with little concern for building a winner. Philadelphia used to have their USL reserve team play in Bethlehem before moving them to Philly (Chester) to save $$. Even the ones that don't share a facility use a lesser stadium in the same market (RB II in Montclair, Loudoun out near Dulles, Tacoma, Salt Lake plays in the parent's training ground, Atlanta plays at a suburban college, etc.). The exception is NYFC and San Antonio, but I don't see much evidence that model will grow. The new league, sanctioned at Division III will undoubtedly continue with MLS cost-controlled, shared resource development model.
Actually, the ESPN article said that the new league was going to have these new league teams play at the parent club stadiums. So they actually wouldn't be any new markets. They said that they hope they can expand into new markets after they start up. I believe I read that correctly....
Admittedly, I don't know the inside skinny. But I think the USL will be fine. I get the feeling they know what they are doing and indy teams are so much more attractive to a community. Two new USL Championship teams are starting next year within 2 hours of Hartford. They don't need those MLS II teams anymore.
I was going to pick one up for you with my 15% off discount card. So that's a no?Screw the Hartford sports scene. Barely any creativity.
Give it to someone poor. But you can also take that money and buy the poor person a better shirt.I was going to pick one up for you with my 15% off discount card. So that's a no?
Trying to parse out your point here. Is it that Blue and Green made Raleigh grow and Boston shrink?Give it to someone poor. But you can also take that money and buy the poor person a better shirt.
Imagine Hartford Athletic going neon green and navy blue. Even that is better than the same colors as the damn Whalers. Raleigh is a bigger market than Hartford-New Haven now. Boston is now the 10th largest metropolis. Was 6th not long ago.