I am the biggest Hurley apologist...but if he doubled Allen, it doesn't happen2/12. The more I think about it the less I blame Hurley. We just got them on the wrong night.
Pretty much. He did play the game of his miserable life.Announcer said “Arkansas is saying to Teddy Allen you are not going to beat us”. I’d say we beat NM State 98 out of 100 times. Even their second and third options are not hitting shots like they were Thursday. Arkansas coach just said in halftime interview that they had 4 different coverages against Teddy Allen. What was our strategy again? Man to man and hope for the best?
I’d say it differently. If Teddy Allen doesn’t score 37 against us we don’t lose.Announcer said “Arkansas is saying to Teddy Allen you are not going to beat us”. I’d say we beat NM State 98 out of 100 times. Even their second and third options are not hitting shots like they were Thursday. Arkansas coach just said in halftime interview that they had 4 different coverages against Teddy Allen. What was our strategy again? Man to man and hope for the best?
Dude. Teddy Alllen scored 37. We didn’t “try” anything. Don’t start with some bullshit like anything else mattered. It didn’t. We didn’t try one thing different.The non-Teddy members of the team shot 2/11 from 3. If the key is just doubling Teddy, why is that happening?
I am a big fan of Hurley. I think he has the potential to be a great coach in the next 5 years. But it is imperative that Hurley understands how important it is to stop the hot hand. When you are playing a team with multiple offensive weapons, you have to be careful doubling. Against Villanova, you can double a few possessions to slow down the hot hand, but you cant do it the whole game. But against a team like NMSU, they really had no other offensive threats. So yes, he has to change that philosophy...We should have never lost to Seton Hall earlier in the season because the same thing happened.Doubling TE as a defensive strategy isn’t exactly an innovative defense. It’s more of a common sense defense. DH’s failure to do just that was owed to stubbornness, rather than a lack of coaching IQ, at least that’s my optimistic take on things. Hopefully, after enough failures, he may see the light and become more flexible in his thinking.
He had 4 30 pt games prior to, and one 40 pt gameMaybe just maybe Teddy Allen had a great game against us and we didn’t think he would have that big of impact on the game.
Easy for Mussleman to watch film from two nights ago and see one guy single handily beat us. His came up with his strategy based of how he played against us, we came up with our based on how he played earlier this season. Allen was clearly the best player but was he so good that it requires screening and doubling every play?
Did Allen have 37 against anyone else this season? The rest of the team were pretty lousy shooters all season, but they shot lights out against us.