How about the B1G Hockey tournament in a totally renovated XL Center. That would be pretty sweet.
Geno: "We did a lot of dumb things that are still haunting us."
- Thread starter UConn9604
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 2,676
- Reaction Score
- 6,254
The next Kyle post I find I'm going to like it whether I do or not...unless he changes his mind and says we're not going, then he's going on my crap list.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 2,676
- Reaction Score
- 6,254
Hmmm, what do others drink while reading here?
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 2,676
- Reaction Score
- 6,254
Any particular reason you're stopping at 4?
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 383
- Reaction Score
- 851
most any kind of red wine. If I'm out of red I'll drink white. If I'm out of white I'll drink whatever beer is in the fridge.
I like even square numbers. Like 4 pods, one of which includes PSU, MD, RU and UCONN.
It's an arena in NYC Metro without a primary sports tenant. Duke can basically pick the day it wants and very likely get it.
It was disingenuous of Geno not to mention Hathaway and Pasqualoni. Now, thanks to Geno, the suit will become the narrative.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 21,351
- Reaction Score
- 49,359
Geno is a little closer to this situation than anyone on this board. If Geno says the lawsuit has played a role, guess what, it probably has. I kinda wished he didn't say it, but as wrong as it may be, the perception is that UConn spearheaded this thing thanks to Blumenthal.
I am usually under the influence when I post on this board. That's why I make such asinine comments and regret them in the morning!
Oh yea, this guy again...
I hope the fourth estate has the ba!!s to ask Blumenthal about Geno's comments and the adverse impact his BS lawsuit has had on UConn's CR chances. One thing is for sure - he can't lay a glove on Geno. Not only was it a BS lawsuit, but in typical fashion he made it especially personal by suing individuals (Swofford, GDF etc.) when all the relief sought could have been had from the institutions sued.
["The suit names Boston College athletic director Gene DeFilippo,
ACC Commissioner John Swofford, ACC President Carolyn Callahan, ACC
Vice President Donn Ward and ACC Treasurer Cecil Huey, Blumenthal
said"] From news report in 2003
Prior post above was right, though. BC also didn't want us in the ACC for competitive reasons. But Blumenthal's law suit gave them another compelling reason to blackball us. It allowed them to foment dissent among other ACC members and the individuals that Blumenthal dragged into his legal odyssey. Ultimately, I believe UConn will end up fine - with zero thanks to Blumenthal
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 5,285
- Reaction Score
- 9,284
I heard it did come up in ACC discussions as well, and probably heard it from either the same person Geno heard it from, or someone who reports to the person Geno heard it from. My person heard it after the fact from an employee of an ACC school who was in the conversations. It did play a role, but was not the sole and only factor (BC doesn't want us in... period, but that alone is not enough; FSU and Clemson were in a measuring contest with Tobacco Road, and LCC was in the midst of a great run in FB and BB while UConn was dealing with APR and in the midst of being "DeLeone'd" in FB. Timing and past actions were stacked against us. So, despite some posters belief that SH and WM shuold have #soldharder, the deck was pretty steeply stacked against them and our vacuum cleaner was not sucking up as much dirt as LCC's vacuum cleaner at the time of the sale.
I agree that FHCPP and Hathaway were awful and didn't help, but they were only relevant in the later stages of recent CR. The big move - Syracuse and Pitt to the ACC - happened in September 2011. It's hard to remember Sept. 2011, but UConn was on a roll. We had just gone to a BCS game, won the NCAA BB title, went to a super regional in the CWS and had beaten Syracuse 5 years in a row in football. So FHCPP and Hathaway really could not have impacted that move. Further, I think anything Geno said was vetted regarding general content. Why? Because he essentially is calling out our former Attorney General and current U.S. Senator and you would think that UConn would only do so after much consideration.
I have another take on Geno's comments. Maybe, it was a mea culpa from someone with Geno's stature, nationally and at UConn, that had to be spoken before the ACC would ever relent. I am still hoping for the B1G, but UConn (through Geno) maybe deliberately put this olive branch out there to mollify the ACC. I'm no fan of the ACC. But, it is still a mona lisa compared to the AAC gulag.
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2012
- Messages
- 2,441
- Reaction Score
- 9,498
I didn't. I was positive we'd get snubbed.
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 7,497
- Reaction Score
- 15,682
WINNER!!! This post PERFECTLY sums up why we are where we are now!!!
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 22,816
- Reaction Score
- 9,456
That's about it in a nutshell. We've had 5 athletic directors since 1969.
John Toner 1969-1987
Todd Turner 1987-1990
Lew Perkins 1990-2003
Jeff Hathaway 2003-2012
Warde Manuel 2012-current
The three years Turner spent at UCONN as AD, were the only 3 years he has ever worked at an institution that did not play 1-A football, and he took over from Toner - who was a big part of creating the 1-AA football experiment. An experiment that has failed. Lew Perkins came from Maryland in 1990, and from literally day 1, began planting the seeds of upgrading from 1-AA football - 2 years before Big East football would be created and ever play a conference game. Lew had many faults, but he accomplished his goal for UCONN. And did it well, by 2003, REntschler was built and we beat a Big 10 program in our first game there.
Hathaway........let everything fall apart slowly for our future, as he counted his pennies on his pay stubs, and the egos and personalities in charge of the basketball programs, men's and women's nationally were enjoying incredible success and feeling pretty immune to the risks to their programs in the intercollegiate landscape, that Lew Perkins talked about since day 1 in 1990.
Nothing represents that more than the entire university structure allowing Tricky Dick to take his publicity stunt to Rockville Superior Court, and actually name the leadership of the ACC and the names of university presidents and athletic directors personally in a lawsuit - when UCONN, should have kept our mouths shut tight around the silver spoon that the Big East conference had handed us.
Manuel - inherited an athletic program, and a university leadership structure that was trying to bail out a sinking ship in the Big East with a spaghetti strainer, while every other division 1A football program that was part of the BCS prior to 2002 in the Big East had been working for 10 years or more - to get out.
University presidents, BOT's, etc. - I don't believe they really know that much about athletics other than that it's extremely important for public image and fund raising. It's the athletic directors that got to steer the ship, and that involves keeping the university presidents and BOT's heading in the right direction as well as the rest of the crew down the chain.
It's all history. We are in the American Athletic Conference now, and we have our work cut out, to maintain our current position in the intercollegiate landscape, and be in the right position to get the votes, if and when, television contracts come up for renewal again.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 22,816
- Reaction Score
- 9,456
I don't have any inside knowledge, but my guess is that as long as the people that were personally named by Blumenthal in the lawsuit, continue to be in charge of universities and the conference leadership of the ACC, they will not support UCONN in any way. To my knowledge, in all the lawsuits that have ever been filed regarding all this intercollegiate athletics mess that is related, that lawsuit is the only one to actually name individuals, instead of institutions. Blumenthal - I personally am embarrassed that he represents my state. That lawsuit, is just one of the reasons. As long as he sits in the senator's seat in Washington, a person like Shalala and all of her connections, won't support anything having to do with UCONN. That's what I think. No evidence - just my opinion.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 22,816
- Reaction Score
- 9,456
The lawsuits- plural - were filed in CT, and named individuals personally as responsible for damaging UCONN. It's pretty shocking to me, still, even now - that it was allowed to happen. People hold grudges, especially if they are sued personally for millions of dollars.
Lew Perkins, never stayed to see his baby succeed - he knew exactly what was happening - his baby was spitting the silver spoon out and he wasn't staying around to try to clean up the mess.
What we do - is acknowledge it happened, learn from it, recognize the importance of the sport of football in the national landscape of intercollegiate athletics, and move forward accordingly demonstrating that we've learned from it, and hopefully voters in CT won't re-elect the liar in the senator's seat.
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2011
- Messages
- 5,925
- Reaction Score
- 14,795
I think Geno believes ACC probably is a little better league, especially with Louisville and ND. I also believes Geno has UVA ties. The realization of us not being in the ACC bothers him more than most.
Geno could have easily said ,bad football hires, or years negative press surrounding the men's team. The litigation was a safer alternative.
My take on the law suit as a Connecticut resident and taxpayer, was it was absolutely necessary. The taxpayers of Connecticut just spent 100's of millions to upgrade from FCS to FSB status. With future games with Miami,VT,and regional rival BC. The future status of the league was unknown.,and it possibly could have completly disintegrated. Some attribute the suit or fear of future litigation ,enabled the Big East to maintain BCS status which attracted Louisville ,Cinn, and USF.
The alternative would be a quasi independent status or a return to FCS.
Hindsight may be 20/20 but without a fair accessment of the alternate outcomes all your doing is speculating.
In my mind the real problem was the mindset of the University leadership who learned nothing from the brush with near death. Especially when Perkins was warning everyone about the future roll of football in determining conference stature.
Geno could have easily said ,bad football hires, or years negative press surrounding the men's team. The litigation was a safer alternative.
My take on the law suit as a Connecticut resident and taxpayer, was it was absolutely necessary. The taxpayers of Connecticut just spent 100's of millions to upgrade from FCS to FSB status. With future games with Miami,VT,and regional rival BC. The future status of the league was unknown.,and it possibly could have completly disintegrated. Some attribute the suit or fear of future litigation ,enabled the Big East to maintain BCS status which attracted Louisville ,Cinn, and USF.
The alternative would be a quasi independent status or a return to FCS.
Hindsight may be 20/20 but without a fair accessment of the alternate outcomes all your doing is speculating.
In my mind the real problem was the mindset of the University leadership who learned nothing from the brush with near death. Especially when Perkins was warning everyone about the future roll of football in determining conference stature.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 22,816
- Reaction Score
- 9,456
I completely disagree that the lawsuit was necessary. The concept that CT taxpayers had been harmed by the construction of Rentschler field and the investment in the upgrade to 1-A football with facilities and infrastructure on campus - is foolish.
I'm no lawyer, but I ask myself - what was the purpose of filing those lawsuits? The lawsuits had zero effect on keeping the Big East conference together - it was the uncertainty around maintaining BCS status, that kept the conference together - if the remaing football schools in 2002-2003 after Miami, VT left had been given a guarantee that they would maintain BCS status - they would have split the conference then. UCONN would have had a choice - go with and stay with the BCS - or stop the upgrade.
edit: just re-read this - yeah, I re-read my posts - admit it - you do too. but this isn't correct, by the time the lawsuits were in place - everything about the upgrade was already complete. We had the stadium, we had donors in place and money to build on campus facilities. The only danger UCONN faced - was losing out on BCS money - that we had not even tasted yet - and wouldn't until 2005!!!
We were suing, for damages, when the only real danger we faced - was losing out on football revenue from the BCS - that we had not yet even collected.
Very few people, and Lew Perkins (and a few others, inicluding me, and I have no influence over anything, understood this - while very powerful personalities at UCONN, were all for the lawsuit)
That was the real damage and risk - we were in no man's land with regards to BCS status - we weren't supposed to join the BCS until 2005. Had the Big East split then and maintained the BCS status, we would have had to convince the football schools to maintain their promise to include us. When the leadership of Syracuse, Pitt, BC, Rutgers, WVU et.al - realized that they could not get a promise to maintain BCS status if they separated from the BIg EAst - there was no danger of a split....but what happened, is every single one of the schools - started then - to look elsewhere for a conference home as TV contracts evolved - other than UCONN under new AD - Hathaway.
By 2012 - every single one of those schools, had found a new home. Blumenthal made himself a lot of publicity, made a few million dollars in a lawsuit, and got eaten for lunch eventually by Shalala. The leadership of the other schools were happy to let it happen and ride in the background - for simple spite and ego, I think - no way would the leadership of Syracuse, Pitt, WVU allowed those suits to happen in their own states, naming all the people that were named.
That's it - won't write any more about it. IT's all there in the history to read.
What we do now, is make sure that everybody knows what happened, learns from it, and when the next time a vote happens that would affect change in the intercollegiate world - that we have accumulated the votes that would help us.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 21,351
- Reaction Score
- 49,359
Where exactly were the schools not picked during the first raid going to go? That lawsuit accomplished one thing, it put others in better positions than us to get scooped up in further expansions. As UConn's "leadership" continued to try and hold the Big East together with duct tape and rubber bands, the head of the conference "expansion" comittee was looking to .
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2012
- Messages
- 15,766
- Reaction Score
- 18,395
I have family members that worked in the Blumenthal AG office. It’s common knowledge of course, but the guy is a glory & publicity hound of the first order, so I think the chance to get all over a suit of the ACC was right up his alley, just another ball to toss into the air among all the other ones his office was juggling. I’ve been told that his staff had a significant problem seeing projects to completion because of all the different things that were heaped on the staff attorney’s plates. Lots of things started, few actually finished.
- Status