Game Week - UConn v. Purdue (Saturday 9/11/21 @ 3p on CBSSN) | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Game Week - UConn v. Purdue (Saturday 9/11/21 @ 3p on CBSSN)

huskymedic said:



Alternate access link here (and these are the usual truncated last few sentences of the Outlook version):

-> The new man in charge is up for the challenge, so it seems. On Tuesday morning, he tweeted, ‘Day 1. Let’s Work and Have Fun.”

It may take quite a bit of work to salvage a season that is quickly racing off the rails. “We’re excited,” Spanos said. “We’re looking forward to the challenge ahead.” <-
Expand ...

Some folks were saying Edsall had to remain for the rest of the season because we had no one to replace Edsall, but Spanos seems very qualified at least on the defensive side. Worked for Dick LeBeau. I knew people read that video wrong so hopefully the players rally around him.

"A video went viral of athletes looking uninterested and unresponsive when Spanos raised his fist to break a defensive huddle.

" “That was awesome,” Spanos said. “We were talking, there’s a wide circle because of what’s going on with everything in the world and the view from afar. If you see there’s layers, layers, layers, because I don’t want tight. ‘Break it down, let’s go to work.’ The guys love it, we always break down. You see sometimes this and sometimes that, they all got the message, and you saw that we’re all in this together. You’ve got to laugh, it’s fun. It’s football, it’s entertainment.” "
 
Dream Jobbed 2.0 said:
I have a feeling the first half of this game this week will be as hard as the team plays all season. We’ll see if that’s enough to keep the game in reach in the second half.
Expand ...

Team played hard for first quarter against Fresno.

Played hard for a half aginst HC.

Common theme is as soon as either team got momentum UConn folded like a cheap suit. Nothing from the players or the staff to slow down the opponents momentum train.

That's the biggest thing I am looking for from the players and staff on Saturday. Once momentum shifts, AKA they get punched in the mouth, do they fight or fold?
 
.-.
Chin Diesel said:
Team played hard for first quarter against Fresno.

Played hard for a half aginst HC.

Common theme is as soon as either team got momentum UConn folded like a cheap suit. Nothing from the players or the staff to slow down the opponents momentum train.

That's the biggest thing I am looking for from the players and staff on Saturday. Once momentum shifts, AKA they get punched in the mouth, do they fight or fold?
Expand ...
Honest question - what makes you think they won’t fold when they are punched in the mouth? You don’t fold because you don’t like your coach - because if that is a reason we have even bigger issues than are already big issues. I said it in another thread - you play for your brothers on the field, you play for your school and you play for your family. I don’t care who the coach is.

that’s what has been the most dissapointing with this roster. We all (well most of us even if some didn’t want to admit) know this roster is not the most talented - we lost to an FCS school for many reasons including abysmal coaching. But many on the roster had similar offers to the players they were squaring up against.

regardless - I just want to see fight. If you get beat because someone is better than you, hey that’s life sometimes, but show some fight. Get back up again and go at it, show some emotion. My hope is that there are some emerging leaders on this roster who saw the things we saw and will call their teammates to task privately.

The culture needs to be changed.
 
And one more thing to add - I actually think the defense has potential (insane, I know). They are not deep and constantly being on the field with a short field with little rest? Not a recipe for success.

I remain at a loss for the play of defensive backs, however.
 
huskysupporter said:
Honest question - what makes you think they won’t fold when they are punched in the mouth?

The culture needs to be changed.
Expand ...

Question and answered in your own post. You are correct the culture needs to change. The difference between folding and winning the play is one breath of effort. The time it takes for one breath is the difference between winning and losing your battle.

Now, do I believe it flips 180 degrees in one game? No. But I want to see improvements in it. Some of it may come from changes on the two deep. Nice to believe that every teenager and young adult is fully maturized into internalizing their motivations for success. Reality is sometimes you need to see your brother on the field take that extra bit of effort to motivate you to do the same. Seeing is believing- a batter in a slump finally sees a well struck ball go in the gap for a double instead of a diving outfielder making a catch, a golfer finally sees a good putt go in the hole instead of lipping out, a basketball shooter sees a jump shot go in...........................
 
Seeing Spanos tweet multiple times about the team having fun leads me to believe one thing and one thing only: that they were miserable prior to the change.

Especially since some of the players, such as Morgan, are retweeting it. If nothing else, maybe we can at least boost morale within 6 days and let's see what effect that it might have on game time...
 
UConnDan97 said:
Seeing Spanos tweet multiple times about the team having fun leads me to believe one thing and one thing only: that they were miserable prior to the change.

Especially since some of the players, such as Morgan, are retweeting it. If nothing else, maybe we can at least boost morale within 6 days and let's see what effect that it might have on game time...
Expand ...
Turnovers were just mo killers. The pick 6 was deflating.
 
.-.
I hope the plan on D is to put as much pressure on the Purdue QB as possible. Blitz at least 70% of the time with various combinations of LBs, corners and safeties. Six or seven guys attacking like mad dogs from all directions. Hit him, rattle him, get in his head. Minimize the time our DBs have to cover. Balls out and let the chips fall where they may. What's to lose?
 
UConnDan97 said:
Seeing Spanos tweet multiple times about the team having fun leads me to believe one thing and one thing only: that they were miserable prior to the change.

Especially since some of the players, such as Morgan, are retweeting it. If nothing else, maybe we can at least boost morale within 6 days and let's see what effect that it might have on game time...
Expand ...
And if they were miserable, having to practice for almost 2 years without a game could have been a contributing factor.
 
gopher2 said:
I hope the plan on D is to put as much pressure on the Purdue QB as possible. Blitz at least 70% of the time with various combinations of LBs, corners and safeties. Six or seven guys attacking like mad dogs from all directions. Hit him, rattle him, get in his head. Minimize the time our DBs have to cover. Balls out and let the chips fall where they may. What's to lose?
Expand ...
The old Don Brown defense was fun to watch. I hope we bring back some of those blitzing packages.
 
huskysupporter said:
Honest question - what makes you think they won’t fold when they are punched in the mouth? You don’t fold because you don’t like your coach - because if that is a reason we have even bigger issues than are already big issues. I said it in another thread - you play for your brothers on the field, you play for your school and you play for your family. I don’t care who the coach is.

that’s what has been the most dissapointing with this roster. We all (well most of us even if some didn’t want to admit) know this roster is not the most talented - we lost to an FCS school for many reasons including abysmal coaching. But many on the roster had similar offers to the players they were squaring up against.

regardless - I just want to see fight. If you get beat because someone is better than you, hey that’s life sometimes, but show some fight. Get back up again and go at it, show some emotion. My hope is that there are some emerging leaders on this roster who saw the things we saw and will call their teammates to task privately.

The culture needs to be changed.
Expand ...
Agree. You got guys that aren’t high intensity, aggressive types that enjoy contact and knocking people down. if I hear one more guy say we need to execute better, I’ll puke. What they need to do is start physically beating teams. Aggression must be job one.
 
.-.
BlueDogs said:
Agree. You got guys that aren’t high intensity, aggressive types that enjoy contact and knocking people down. if I hear one more guy say we need to execute better, I’ll puke. What they need to do is start physically beating teams. Aggression must be job one.
Expand ...
Don’t say I necessarily agree with this take. This year I definitely see aggressive tackling and a more physical presence with this team. Truth is, if you watch the games again it is mostly an execution problem. You can be as aggressive as you want to be but if you’re in the wrong position then it’s baseless
 
Chin Diesel said:
Question and answered in your own post. You are correct the culture needs to change. The difference between folding and winning the play is one breath of effort. The time it takes for one breath is the difference between winning and losing your battle.

Now, do I believe it flips 180 degrees in one game? No. But I want to see improvements in it. Some of it may come from changes on the two deep. Nice to believe that every teenager and young adult is fully maturized into internalizing their motivations for success. Reality is sometimes you need to see your brother on the field take that extra bit of effort to motivate you to do the same. Seeing is believing- a batter in a slump finally sees a well struck ball go in the gap for a double instead of a diving outfielder making a catch, a golfer finally sees a good putt go in the hole instead of lipping out, a basketball shooter sees a jump shot go in...........................
Expand ...

Wait. It's possible for golfers to see good putts go in the hole and not lip out? Who knew.
 
Hornet22 said:
Don’t say I necessarily agree with this take. This year I definitely see aggressive tackling and a more physical presence with this team. Truth is, if you watch the games again it is mostly an execution problem. You can be as aggressive as you want to be but if you’re in the wrong position then it’s baseless
Expand ...
Hornet: Execution is essential, but it isn’t the whole. I think you know a good % of the game is psychological and rooted in physicality. You can make opponents not execute through physicality resulting in fatigue, second guessing, hesitancy. Holy Cross won that game because they believed they could stand physically toe to toe with UConn. We never won the body mind battle. By Q3 their D line should have been beat down. It wasn’t. Our Defense was not putting big hits on them, pressure was intermittent, and they never really felt pressed. Go back and see how many guys were swarming to the tackle. Very few.
 
BlueDogs said:
Hornet: Execution is essential, but it isn’t the whole. I think you know a good % of the game is psychological and rooted in physicality. You can make opponents not execute through physicality resulting in fatigue, second guessing, hesitancy. Holy Cross won that game because they believed they could stand physically toe to toe with UConn. We never won the body mind battle. By Q3 their D line should have been beat down. It wasn’t. Our Defense was not putting big hits on them, pressure was intermittent, and they never really felt pressed. Go back and see how many guys were swarming to the tackle. Very few.
Expand ...
I agree with you on the line. Small percentage of it is execution and the majority is pure physical- we lost that battle- at least on the OL. In terms of our D Line, the fact that Sluka could scramble posed a problem for our box. Save for that long run by their QB, it wasn’t like they gashed us for lots of yardage on the ground.

I still feel that we forced enough punts that if our offense cashed in on most of those possessions we would have psychologically beat them down. And to your point, when the mind goes the body soon follows.

For instance, after we scored on our long td, their first snap Jones smacked the QB. The next play, Durante physically dislodged the ball from the RB and we recovered and scored a few plays later. Next possession we forced a 3 and out with that 3rd down tackle by Fortt being very physical. HC started doubting themselves. We score after that game is over. Instead, JZ throws it off a lineman’s helmet and into theirs foe a pick 6

HOWEVER, if we finished them off on D we probably win the game and Edsall is still here so…As the old saying goes: “Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth.”
 
.-.
gioff2323 said:
It’s hard to out physical an opponent who is physically stronger.
Expand ...
No way HC had a physically stronger team. I know that heights and weights aren't necessarily a good proxy for strength, but compare the UConn and HC starting lines and TE:

OL:

UConn average: 6'5" 300 lbs
HC average: 6'5" 291 lbs

DL:

UConn average: 6'4" 284 lbs
HC average: 6'3" 268 lbs.

TE:

UConn: 6'4" 253 lbs.
HC: 6'4" 235 lbs.


In my opinion, the differences in the game were QB play and missed assignments, not strength.
 
huskymedic said:
Expand ...

This makes him sound like he could be a solid game manager with the right assistants if communication is good. And he's probably more ready than most. Only issue could be late game decisions and clock management if we're lucky enough to get there.
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,299
Messages
4,562,009
Members
10,453
Latest member
Storytory


Top Bottom