Fox Sports’ Analyst Joel Klatt takes aim at the NCAA tournament | Page 3 | The Boneyard
.-.

Fox Sports’ Analyst Joel Klatt takes aim at the NCAA tournament

How about this. Joel Klatt is the dumbest sportscaster and the least aware one in all sports. The NCAA basketball Tounsment is the best tournament in all sports! Watching the cinderellas knock off bluebloods is great and if the bluebloodbgetting knocked off is Duke or Kentucky all the better.

Guessing he is a shill for the SEC or Big 10.
 
I like advocating for the devil because even in his explanation, he stresses that it is great entertainment but not the best way to determine a national champion.

2011
UConn ultimately won it all and was a deserving champion. But Butler vs VCU in the Final 4 is a complete bust.

3 UConn
4 Kentucky
8 Butler
11 VCU

These were the teams seeded higher than UConn. There were at least 40 teams seeded higher than VCU

Ohio State
Duke
Kansas
Pitt
North Carolina
SDSU
Notre Dame
Florida
 
The only real issue I have with it is conference tournaments deciding the automatic qualifier. That’s a bad idea that often eliminates worthy teams. If you eliminated that we’d have no bad teams in the field.
I agree on that. Talk about made for tv events. For major conferences they are mostly irrelevant. Oh you have the odd Georgetown or NC State making a run mostly costing some place holder bubble team a slot. But mostly it doesn’t matter in any way. If you must do it, I would do a 4 team tournament. Everyone else have a nice Summer. For smaller leagues you watch far too many regular season champs get knocked off. Happened to Central Connecticut the last 2 years. Win the NEC Regular season but lost in the NEC tournament. Happened to Monmouth a few years ago when they had like 2 losses all season.
 
I agree on that. Talk about made for tv events. For major conferences they are mostly irrelevant. Oh you have the odd Georgetown or NC State making a run mostly costing some place holder bubble team a slot. But mostly it doesn’t matter in any way. If you must do it, I would do a 4 team tournament. Everyone else have a nice Summer. For smaller leagues you watch far too many regular season champs get knocked off. Happened to Central Connecticut the last 2 years. Win the NEC Regular season but lost in the NEC tournament. Happened to Monmouth a few years ago when they had like 2 losses all season.
Is a bit silly when you think about it - rewarding a team on a little tournament rather than a season long accomplishment. I'm all for doing anything we can to get the best teams out of these conferences in. We don't want totally uncompetetive games in the dance.

Listening to Klatt about hoops is pointless.
 
I like advocating for the devil because even in his explanation, he stresses that it is great entertainment but not the best way to determine a national champion.

2011
UConn ultimately won it all and was a deserving champion. But Butler vs VCU in the Final 4 is a complete bust.

3 UConn
4 Kentucky
8 Butler
11 VCU

These were the teams seeded higher than UConn. There were at least 40 teams seeded higher than VCU

Ohio State
Duke
Kansas
Pitt
North Carolina
SDSU
Notre Dame
Florida
2011 was a strange year. No GREAT teams. Just a lot of really good ones. That Butler team was actually very good. I don’t think they were viewed as your typical mid-major. They had been to the Sweet 16 in 2007 or 08, then the title game in 2010 and were back in 2011. In 2010 they missed a shot at the buzzer and lost to Duke by 2. Many writers expected them to beat UConn in 2011. A lot of people thought of them as the Gonzaga of the plains. It’s hard to get to the Championship game 2 years in a row.
 
2011 was a strange year. No GREAT teams. Just a lot of really good ones. That Butler team was actually very good. I don’t think they were viewed as your typical mid-major. They had been to the Sweet 16 in 2007 or 08, then the title game in 2010 and were back in 2011. In 2010 they missed a shot at the buzzer and lost to Duke by 2. Many writers expected them to beat UConn in 2011. A lot of people thought of them as the Gonzaga of the plains. It’s hard to get to the Championship game 2 years in a row.
That's true, Butler was on a roll. I have recency bias. It is also annoying that I have 25 or 6 to 4 stuck in my head for some completely unrelated reason. apologies to all.
 
.-.
Many writers expected them to beat UConn in 2011.
I don't remember it like that. I think UConn was a 5 or 6 point favorite. That 2011 Butler team wasn't as good as the 2010 team with Gordon Hayward.

I asked ChatGPT, not that I trust it, and it said most analysts expected UConn to win in a close game.
 
Last edited:
Is a bit silly when you think about it - rewarding a team on a little tournament rather than a season long accomplishment. I'm all for doing anything we can to get the best teams out of these conferences in. We don't want totally uncompetetive games in the dance.

Listening to Klatt about hoops is pointless.
But, without the BE tourney in 2011, we may have been on the wrong side of the bubble. 19-9
 
We were nowhere near the bubble. We beat the #2 ranked team, #7, #8, #9, #12. Not a single bad loss, undefeated out of conference, and the Big East was considered the best conference ever that season.
You’re both right. But, I do have a recollection of the talking heads saying that to ensure getting in, the huskies would need at least one BE tourney win.
 
I like advocating for the devil because even in his explanation, he stresses that it is great entertainment but not the best way to determine a national champion.

2011
UConn ultimately won it all and was a deserving champion. But Butler vs VCU in the Final 4 is a complete bust.

3 UConn
4 Kentucky
8 Butler
11 VCU

These were the teams seeded higher than UConn. There were at least 40 teams seeded higher than VCU

Ohio State
Duke
Kansas
Pitt
North Carolina
SDSU
Notre Dame
Florida

The teams in the FF won 4 games

The "better" teams lost

You have to WIN

Survive and advance
 
Last edited:
.-.
the best or at least one of the top 3 or four teams almost always win anyway so I just don’t really see his point, no Cinderella is actually winning the tournament. You want to actually determine the best team, then don’t even have a tournament, just have have Ken Pomeroy walk out on a stage and hand the team with highest metric a trophy.
 
2011 was a strange year. No GREAT teams. Just a lot of really good ones. That Butler team was actually very good. I don’t think they were viewed as your typical mid-major. They had been to the Sweet 16 in 2007 or 08, then the title game in 2010 and were back in 2011. In 2010 they missed a shot at the buzzer and lost to Duke by 2. Many writers expected them to beat UConn in 2011. A lot of people thought of them as the Gonzaga of the plains. It’s hard to get to the Championship game 2 years in a row.
Disagree. We were great.
 
That's true, Butler was on a roll. I have recency bias. It is also annoying that I have 25 or 6 to 4 stuck in my head for some completely unrelated reason. apologies to all.
Hopefully this version from Tanglewood. The solo from Terry Kath here is astonishing.

 
Very simply, breaking down Klatt's argument.

Winning on the field (or court) does not indicate which team is better.

That is what he is saying.
 
.-.
Very simply, breaking down Klatt's argument.

Winning on the field (or court) does not indicate which team is better.

That is what he is saying.

That’s true but that’s sports.

If you wanted the “best” team to win the title, you’d award it to the regular season champ in most cases. As the EPL does, and college football sorta used to.
 
After finishing the season 4-7, we were looking at a pretty bad seed, if not the bubble.
Sometimes things are debatable. This really is not. #1 you forgot just how strong the Big East was that year. In the final AP poll before the BE tournament here are the rankings of BE teams: Pitt 3, ND 4, Syracuse 11, Louisville 14, St John’s 17, West Virginia 20, UConn 21, Georgetown 22, Cincinnati 25. Villanova was the top others receiving votes. Practically every game was a battle of ranked teams. The current #3 in the NBE would cry if they looked at a schedule like that! In the some things never change category, DePaul had 1 BE win and 4 total.

UConn was still ranked. No chance they were getting left out. Winning got them a higher seed for sure. But you want to talk battle tested, they were it. Plus they had wins over several other top 25 teams including Texas.
 
I agree on that. Talk about made for tv events. For major conferences they are mostly irrelevant. Oh you have the odd Georgetown or NC State making a run mostly costing some place holder bubble team a slot. But mostly it doesn’t matter in any way. If you must do it, I would do a 4 team tournament. Everyone else have a nice Summer. For smaller leagues you watch far too many regular season champs get knocked off. Happened to Central Connecticut the last 2 years. Win the NEC Regular season but lost in the NEC tournament. Happened to Monmouth a few years ago when they had like 2 losses all season.
The conferences can give bid to regular season champ like ivy. They would rather have a tournament for revenue and excitement. Most of these teams lose in round 1 particularly post nil. It works great as is
 
Very simply, breaking down Klatt's argument.

Winning on the field (or court) does not indicate which team is better.

That is what he is saying.
Correct. I don't think anyone is arguing that an unranked VCU was the 4th best team in 2011

Hopefully this version from Tanglewood. The solo from Terry Kath here is astonishing.


I am no musician but when I listen to this song, it doesn't sound like the music is overly complex. The song rocks with guitars, drums, horns. The guitar solo is great but otherwise I think this is probably something most musicians can play. I like to believe that sometimes Keep It Simple is the best way so even amateurs like me can hear all the different sounds. I could be way way off bass here, so to speak. Point being, it doesn't have to be incredibly complex and intricate to sound great.
 
.-.

Online statistics

Members online
353
Guests online
6,826
Total visitors
7,179

Forum statistics

Threads
165,877
Messages
4,458,543
Members
10,328
Latest member
LYDKID


Top Bottom