Norvell absolutely fleeced them. I'm a Miami Hurricanes fan in football, so my knowledge/hatred of the Nole is profound. FSU has started 0-2 5 times since 1976, and 3 of them are Mike Norvell. And yet, after last season, they extended him with a contract worth roughly 10 Mil a year. His buyout is quite large. He'll be at FSU for the foreseeable future. Keep in mind, FSU had to pony up a large buyout for Jimbo a few years back.
Well, UConn left a conference but had to go independent, which is a tougher road. Don't sell Clemson short, it is certainly capable of dropping a few more games in that lineup.
This weekend, App St knocking off Clemson would not disappoint many neutral observers.
Norvell had a big year at the perfect time. The threat of another program pursuing him allowed him to score big, and I give him credit for that. I'm just surprised that a lot of people were so all in on their team this year. They had a great group of transfers last year, but it was 6th year Jordan Travis who was the reason for that season. They had quite a few escapes last year, and when he went down they were not even close to the team that was winning. And that was before the bowl game they didn't bother to show up for. It's really hard to hit that big in the portal year after year, but I guess people just expected it. They may get things together as the season goes on, but they look really weak so far.
I find it amusing that FSU was part of the reason that this new revenue sharing model was adopted, and in the first year of the models existence FSU might earn less money as a result. Awesome.
ACC schools have a new path to more revenue: Just win... in the postseason
Atlantic Coast Conference schools have a new path to more revenue tied to their own postseason success.apnews.com
-> This is the first sports season under a new model allowing ACC schools to keep more of the money generated by their own postseason success, a departure from decades of equal distributions among full league members. That “success initiative” could mean $20 million to $25 million more for a school in a big year, based primarily on football like everything else in college athletics.
It also could incentivize more investments in those revenue-driving programs, with the aim of generating their own bump to the bottom line alongside winning championships.
“We’re seeing more and more of a movement toward if you generate it, you get it,” North Carolina athletic director Bubba Cunningham said in an interview with The Associated Press. <-
-> The ACC’s model centers around the expanded 12-team College Football Playoff. Teams could earn $4 million for an appearance, another $4 million for reaching the second round, $6 million for the semifinals and $6 million for the title game — a total of $20 million.
Teams also can earn success money by finishing in the top 25 of the CFP rankings and reaching a bowl game. And football money is positioned to climb.
“That grows as we go forward because those other numbers grow, and the CFP dollars grow,” ACC Commissioner Jim Phillips said. <-
I love how after the merit based revenue distribution was approived, FSU began complainiing about the value of their football brand and how that was what the revenue distributions should have been based on.
Michigan State was the same in 2021. Mel Tucker had a Heisman candidate he pulled from the portal. Kenneth Walker had a dream season, won the Walter Camp and Doak Walker award and was a unanimous All American. Mel Tucker beat Michigan and was signed to a $100 million contract. The team was not good in ‘22 and ‘23 and was fired with cause in ‘23 for something he should not have been doing over a conference call. They are afraid he would go to a bigger team, so they signed him for 10 years and $100 million.
I’m not a fan of unequal revenue sharing, but i can get behind it if it is merit based. This brand based revenue is a crock. That’s just a beauty contest at that point.
awfulannouncing.com
Makes perfect sense.
Maybe not blame, but they are rightly criticized. When UCF went undefeated and wasn't invited for the playoffs, they still showed up for their bowl game to prove that yes, even under duress of being looked over, they had the mental and physical toughness to beat their opponent whoever it was (besting a fairly competent Auburn team in the process). If only bowl playoff games have any meaning, then why bother playing all these other bowls? I grew up loving these bowls from mid-December to early Jan, so I'd like to see teams happy to be playing in one. I get not wanting to get injured prior to the draft, but come on, how many of these opt-out players would have been seriously injured to the extent that their lottery number would fall? Totally agree that they got shafted so that King Saban could be given the red carpet.
