- Joined
- Aug 22, 2016
- Messages
- 954
- Reaction Score
- 2,985
So when this all blows over and someone lists all the schools that have ever pulled a scholly, UCONN will be one of them. Big deal. No awards either way.
I think this is his son @pgammo, not @ pgammons.
I"m going out on a limb and suggesting Peter Gammons doesn't have much pull with football recruits, their parents or their coaches.
I just hope the difference in ability between this kid and the kid we end up getting with our last scholly ends up being worth all the trouble.
... and now here comes the Verducci family faction?
Peter Gammons (@pgammo)
1/18/17, 10:07 PM
UConn reneges on scholarship offer, ditches N.J. football recruit in 11th hour http:// Message:don't entrust you son to Randy Edsall
These people are just mind blowing in their ignorance. Stunning.
I hope someone publishes every school that pulled a ship, and every recruit that decommitted. I want every single one of the put on display for their heinous actions.So when this all blows over and someone lists all the schools that have ever pulled a scholly, UCONN will be one of them. Big deal. No awards either way.
Uconnbill is fired up. I love it.
Someone find Dee Snyder. We're not gonna take it.
Yeah Edsall's not a high character guy because he has to tell players who can't play at the AAC level they can't play at the AAC level.
I do not think you get the point that the quote you are using is basically inferring that you are stupid for thinking that telling this kid he can't play here makes Edsall not a high quality guy, right? The quote that you put there is the exact opposite of going along with your point. Whaler is using sarcasm there.That was one of the things that drove me crazy when they brought him back, all of the folks here calling him "high character" when he clearly wasn't. I'm glad the that isn't the consensus anymore. Just win, baby.
Sally Jenkins went scorched earth on Edsall yesterday. I think the previous version of Edsall rubbed people the wrong way cause he acted like Bellichik while winning like Edsall.That was one of the things that drove me crazy when they brought him back, all of the folks here calling him "high character" when he clearly wasn't. I'm glad the that isn't the consensus anymore. Just win, baby.
Assuming the events played out as Dickens says, which isn't a certainty at all, then I would say that this was indeed a "high character" move by HCRE! The media is so caught up in their faux outrage hype, that they can't see how favorable this is for the kid. To give him as much time as they could to find a program that fits his style, is much better than either telling him last minute (a la Michigan, etc) or worse, bringing him on board anyway and having him never play in this uptempo, high speed defense.That was one of the things that drove me crazy when they brought him back, all of the folks here calling him "high character" when he clearly wasn't. I'm glad the that isn't the consensus anymore. Just win, baby.
That was one of the things that drove me crazy when they brought him back, all of the folks here calling him "high character" when he clearly wasn't. I'm glad the that isn't the consensus anymore. Just win, baby.
Our program is sorely lacking in team speed. Diaco recruited elephants. Edsall recruited team speed in the past, in lieu and above almost aeverything else. If you were fast and could move your feet, you could play, and we competed. We need it again. Did I mention speed?
You can coach or weight train and develop anything except natural speed and height. Given the choice of height or speed. Speed wins.
If whoever this kid is, and I haven't read the thread and won't, just getting close to signing day so I took a peak at the football board - first time in months, becuase I was disgusted with the program last fall, but whatever - glad people are still talking.
If whoever this kid is, is really fast, then it's loss, if he isn't, then it's not.
Next batter up.
Carl, Carl - you're alive!!!
If whoever this kid is, is really fast, then it's loss, if he isn't, then it's not.
Next batter up.
They know he doesn't fit Crocker's defense.
I asked my son today how he would handle this situation. Let me preface this by saying my son is 13 (so take this for what it's worth, but I was curious to see his perspective) and has aspirations of playing college baseball. I played collegiately, and he's far better at his age then I was and has more opportunities to develop his talents then I did. So, it's a possibility. Anyway, he knew nothing about this story, so I posed the question to him from a baseball standpoint. He was offered by the previous coach and verbally committed 7-months ago. A verbal commitment holds no guarantee until you sign your letter of intent, which is in two-weeks. The coach that offered the scholly was fired and a new coach was named. The new coach said he would evaluate those offered. An assistant coach visited and said they were still interested in you attending the school. A new hitting coach was hired a week ago. He evaluated you and didn't think you fit his approach. The head coach called you and said after speaking with his hitting coach they've decided to pull your scholly less then two weeks from signing day. You have other schools interested but they're not high level programs. How would you feel and how would you handle it? His words...."Well, I'd be upset but there's nothing I could really do. The new coach didn't recruit me. He, at least, was honest. Besides, I have other options even if they're not as big. My next question....Would you be so upset that you would blast the new coach on social media or in the newspaper? Him...."No, I'll just find somewhere else to go. I'll probably have a better chance to play right away at a smaller school anyway. I'll go to one of those schools and prove they missed out on a great player."
He made me proud. I love that kid.
Tonight, I filled my wife (who doesn't follow football) in to see how she would react. I told her the whole (one-sided) story. She said she'd be upset for the kid but thought it was ridiculous that parents would take it to the media. The kid wasn't recruited by the new coach, they owe him nothing, even if he was told they would honor the scholly a few days earlier. If the new DC didn't think he was a good fit, why would you still want to go there. If signing day is in two-weeks, they at least gave him a chance to explore other options and he would probably play sooner at a smaller school. It's not like he was already on campus and they took it away (which actually happened to a friend of hers son). She said it's disappointing but you move on.
Maybe we were raised different, but I just don't get how you could be so upset that you'd do everything in your power to smear the new coach and the university. Has the kid received a Nebraska offer??? That tells you all you need to know. Life's full of disappointment, man up and move on. Use it as motivation.
If we're taking on kids that don't fit the system or don't belong in D1 it won't be a question of not being Michigan or Bama. It will be about not belonging in FBS because we are more concerned about appearances and hurt feelings than being competitive. But you're onboard with the double-standard for dumping recruits intentionally if we get to the elite level. That's reassuring.
You aren't very swift. I think it is a terrible move for anyone. I mentioned Bama and Michigan because I think we are so far away from them on the program spectrum that bringing them up is absurb. Like saying, "If I was Bill Gates...." well you aren't so don't even mention him (Bama and Michigan in this scenario).
It is one scholarship if the kid is that bad, you eat it. Coach him up for a year or two then see. Could have easily brought him in for a year then helped him find a landing spot at the end of the season. That also happens all the time. One schilly i's not worth the press we are getting at this point in the program.