February General CBB Discussion Thread | Page 49 | The Boneyard

February General CBB Discussion Thread

KingAG said:
Purdue is objectively mid as well
Expand ...
Yeah not a contender. I’ve seen them on the 2 line. Easily the two I’d want. I’ve punted them out of contender for awhile now, along with Nebraska and Vandy. You can’t be that unathletic and win.

The one team I’m keeping an eye on is Arkansas. They have a ton of talent.
 
RuffRuff said:
Expand ...

Blah Blah Blah Whatever GIF by Minions
 
.-.
I won’t put anything down on it, but I don’t think this URI loss is indicative of SLU not being able to make noise in the tourney. Being in the A10 means that every night is basically an opportunity for a bad loss
 
Is 23-24 UConn gonna be the new standard for every good team every year?

Its old already.

Win a chip.
 
Wisconsin continues to make no sense.

They have a few great wins then they're also down 15 to Ohio State.
 
.-.
KingAG said:
Because they won a chip.

Win the chip. Then we can compare.
Expand ...
The guy is comparing roster structure/type. But sure. They’ll be everyone’s favorite, so a nice pressure to put on a team.

Nowell no minutes tonight - him and Abraham total flops. Kid can’t get time in the A10 as a sophomore. What a miss of an entire cycle between HS and portal for us that year. I wonder what the alternatives were at the HS level. Even Pettiford pretty bad this year.
 
KingAG said:
Is 23-24 UConn gonna be the new standard for every good team every year?

Its old already.

Win a chip.
Expand ...
Not that I care what Zanetto says, but its a compliment also. The Mich team is/has demolished teams. As did we, and we did it in the tournament which is really all that matters. But its cool for other incredible teams to get compared to us as a measuring stick IMO.
 
.-.
CardiacAndre7 said:
Not that I care what Zanetto says, but its a compliment also. The Mich team is/has demolished teams. As did we, and we did it in the tournament which is really all that matters. But its cool for other incredible teams to get compared to us as a measuring stick IMO.
Expand ...
I guess. I just think its a premature comparison. I get it. But they aren't 2024 UConn yet. They havent even won their conference tournament yet.
 
KingAG said:
I guess. I just think its a premature comparison. I get it. But they aren't 2024 UConn yet. They havent even won their conference tournament yet.
Expand ...
You don't have to take offense to it. He's just saying their roster looks "bullet proof" because they have Mara. Because otherwise they aren't much like that UConn roster at all. They have bohemeths at the 4 & 3, their 2G is nothing like Cam and their PG is nothing like Newt. Really good, but not UConn 24 good.
 
RuffRuff said:
The guy is comparing roster structure/type. But sure. They’ll be everyone’s favorite, so a nice pressure to put on a team.

Nowell no minutes tonight - him and Abraham total flops. Kid can’t get time in the A10 as a sophomore. What a miss of an entire cycle between HS and portal for us that year. I wonder what the alternatives were at the HS level. Even Pettiford pretty bad this year.
Expand ...

Reed and McNeeley were in that cycle, or did you just mean guards?

IIRC there was some early Boogie and Edgecombe interest but nothing happened there in terms of visits. I forget who else.

It wasn't a great PG year for recruits, or for transfers.
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,138
Messages
4,508,917
Members
10,383
Latest member
billybob


Top Bottom