Obviously it is better to have him suit up than to be chained on the bench. You don't get named NY State player of the year, even in a down year, if you are a stiff. What is questionable is what type of a player will he be. Early on most 'yarders seemed to think he would be a low post force, at least defensively, blocking shots and rebounding. That early "expectation" seems to be somewhat in doubt.
Apparently he isn't as tall as reported; he is considerably less than an HU. Some observers are positing that he is a stretch 4 like Daniels.
If that is the case, either Nolan and/or Brimah need to produce big time. Defensive rebounding is the key weakness of this team. Coach Ollie has a plethora of offensive options, so even if Facey is more like Daniels than Hilton Armstrong; if he is a superior defender, he could still be a solid asset. While it is nice to have another big who can hit mid range jumpers; that is not something that is really a worry.
As far as playing time is concerned, Giffey may be the big loser. I am assuming that Giffey will see most of his time at either the 3 or 4. If Facey is taking away time at the 4; it will be harder for Nils to average 20 minutes a game. One could argue that if Facey is good enough to take time away from Giffey; the team will still benefit. Nils is a good soldier; so he won't pout, but I believe that Giffey needs minutes to affect the game. The little things that he does are cumulative, also I believe that he will be more willing to take his offensive opportunities if he is playing more.
The argument for Facey is that if Daniels leaves; Facey's game experience will be critical for the 14-15 squad and beyond.
Coach Ollie is going to face a different problem this season, barring the near catastrophic series of injuries of last season, he must try to find playing time for a number of talented players while looking to a future rotation. What to do with Samuels is another problem in this vein. Last year he was the Coach trying to stop the leaks in the dike with chewing gum.
Apparently he isn't as tall as reported; he is considerably less than an HU. Some observers are positing that he is a stretch 4 like Daniels.
If that is the case, either Nolan and/or Brimah need to produce big time. Defensive rebounding is the key weakness of this team. Coach Ollie has a plethora of offensive options, so even if Facey is more like Daniels than Hilton Armstrong; if he is a superior defender, he could still be a solid asset. While it is nice to have another big who can hit mid range jumpers; that is not something that is really a worry.
As far as playing time is concerned, Giffey may be the big loser. I am assuming that Giffey will see most of his time at either the 3 or 4. If Facey is taking away time at the 4; it will be harder for Nils to average 20 minutes a game. One could argue that if Facey is good enough to take time away from Giffey; the team will still benefit. Nils is a good soldier; so he won't pout, but I believe that Giffey needs minutes to affect the game. The little things that he does are cumulative, also I believe that he will be more willing to take his offensive opportunities if he is playing more.
The argument for Facey is that if Daniels leaves; Facey's game experience will be critical for the 14-15 squad and beyond.
Coach Ollie is going to face a different problem this season, barring the near catastrophic series of injuries of last season, he must try to find playing time for a number of talented players while looking to a future rotation. What to do with Samuels is another problem in this vein. Last year he was the Coach trying to stop the leaks in the dike with chewing gum.