- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 481
- Reaction Score
- 2,906
I like that Michigan State is ranked 321 in forcing turnovers and 302 in turnover margin.
7 of their losses were by 5pts or fewer. They have size and at least one very talented dude who wants to kill us on a personal level. Meanwhile we're mentally and (mostly) physically soft.
7 of their losses were by 5pts or fewer. They have size and at least one very talented dude who wants to kill us on a personal level. Meanwhile we're mentally and (mostly) physically soft.
He's probably already whining that they have to come out east to play.Added bonus, we may have the opportunity to make Mick Cronin cry once again.
But when you cannot inbounds the ball…..I like that Michigan State is ranked 321 in forcing turnovers and 302 in turnover margin.
Can't wait to quote you so many times7 of their losses were by 5pts or fewer. They have size and at least one very talented dude who wants to kill us on a personal level. Meanwhile we're mentally and (mostly) physically soft.
They won the conference and conference tourney. A 5.Was interesting reading through the St. John's fans frustration about their seeding. Lots of folks who were resigned to UConn potentially getting the same seed as St. John's or higher if St. John's was disrespected (most seemed to be expecting a 3/4 for the Johnnies).
The responses about UConn getting a 2 despite "Losing to Marquette" while they were stuck as a 5 was interesting... they seem to have forgotten that UConn had as many wins against top-16 seeds out of conference play, as they had games (all losses) against any tournament team. (St. John's was 4-4 overall; 0-3 out of conference against tournament teams; UConn 8-3; 6-1 out of conference)
Furman is relatvely tall, but they are not big. Their centers are 6'11" 225 and 6'11" 215 compared to Reed at 6'11" 265 and Reibe at 7' 1" 260. Their frosh PG (from the Boston area) is 6' 5" 175 and a volume scorer with a 1.25 assist/TO ratio. (My guess is he will hit the portal as he was a late bloomer who didn't attract a ton of attention until late.). Other key players are 6' 4" 184, 6' 7" 220, and 6' 7" 200. I don't think their size will be an issue. Also, they are 32.7% 3 point shooting team, but 47.6% FG and a 69% FT shooting team.Also had half an eye as the Paladins defeated UNC Greensboro. No idea whether Furman’s a truly strong mid major. FWIW, one of the CBS Sports yappers mentioned the Paladins have among the tallest March Madness rosters and a quality frosh PG. Which UConn team appears Friday?
38 and 46Graphic is not showing UCF or South Florida
Both will play away from basket on occasion, especially Johnston.Furman is relatvely tall, but they are not big. Their centers are 6'11" 225 and 6'11" 215 compared to Reed at 6'11" 265 and Reibe at 7' 1" 260. Their frosh PG (from the Boston area) is 6' 5" 175 and a volume scorer with a 1.25 assist/TO ratio. (My guess is he will hit the portal as he was a late bloomer who didn't attract a ton of attention until late.). Other key players are 6' 4" 184, 6' 7" 220, and 6' 7" 200. I don't think their size will be an issue. Also, they are 32.7% 3 point shooting team, but 47.6% FG and a 69% FT shooting team.
They were 0-1 in Quad 1 games, 0-2 in Quad 2, 5-5 in Quad 3, and 14-4 in Quad 4. Their Quad 1 loss was against Northern Iowa by 16 points.
I noticed that and kind of hoped we would be in that bracket so I could go to the S16 and E8 gamesAnyone else notice Clark picked UCLA to beat us?
I think ISU has a pretty easy path to the elite 8 in the Midwest
You have to click into tweet to see the whole list.Graphic is not showing UCF or South Florida
Seth ended up taking ucla too but he’s a dumbarseI noticed that and kind of hoped we would be in that bracket so I could go to the S16 and E8 games
It is always a good sign when Seth picking against us.Seth ended up taking ucla too but he’s a dummmy
They’re still new to this, give them a break.Was interesting reading through the St. John's fans frustration about their seeding. Lots of folks who were resigned to UConn potentially getting the same seed as St. John's or higher if St. John's was disrespected (most seemed to be expecting a 3/4 for the Johnnies).
The responses about UConn getting a 2 despite "Losing to Marquette" while they were stuck as a 5 was interesting... they seem to have forgotten that UConn had as many wins against top-16 seeds out of conference play, as they had games (all losses) against any tournament team. (St. John's was 4-4 overall; 0-3 out of conference against tournament teams; UConn 8-3; 6-1 out of conference)
They didn't do that well out of conference and then the BE was weak this year and didn't provide Q1 games. St. John's had 5 Q1 wins which is too low to get a good seed. Every team ranked above them had 7 or more Quad 1 wins. St. John's had a Quad 3 loss and only 2 teams ranked above them had a Quad 3 loss, Gonzaga and UConn.Rank St John 18th after they won something like 17 out of last 18 games is ridiculous.