- Joined
- Sep 16, 2011
- Messages
- 50,466
- Reaction Score
- 178,428
I think Bird has somehow become the most underrated person in sports along with Marino. I love Duncan but he just wasn't as good as Bird IMO. The only thing that slowed BIrd down was his back, he simply dominated the mid 80's.. Duncan was significantly better defensively (Bird's D underrated) and a better rebounder (hard to believe Bird only averaged 1 fewer rebound per game) but Bird was better at every single other aspect of the game and if I want anybody in the history of basketball taking the last shot it's Larry Bird.Dunno why Bird slipped my mind. That said, you could make a good case for Duncan over him based on a number of metrics:
Advanced Stats:
Win SharesDuncan - 206.4Bird - 145.8PERDuncan - 24.2Bird - 23.5VORPDuncan - 89.3Bird - 79.7
Defense is where Duncan really set himself apart. Bird was a good defender, Duncan was elite. Leaving aside advanced stats:
All NBA Defensive TeamDuncan - 15 total; 8 First Team (tied for 2nd all time)Bird - 3 total; 0 First team
Duncan named to both a All-NBA team and an NBA All-Defensive teams for 13 straight seasons, by far the longest such streak in NBA history. Next closest was nine.
All NBADuncan - 10 All-NBA First Team (third all time); 3 Second teamBird - 9 All-NBA First teams; 1 second teamTitlesDuncan - 5 (3 Finals MVP)Bird - 3 (1 Finals MVP)Longevity/Durability:Duncan - 19 Seasons; 1392 games; 251 playoffsBird - 13 Seasons; 897 games; 164 playoffs
Add the fact that Duncan was the best ever at his position.
I wouldn't begrudge anybody to choose either way. If I'm starting a team, I'm taking Duncan over Bird myself.
If players are somewhat close I will always take the more unstopoable offensive player/shot maker. It's why I take Dirk over Garnett, KG simply couldn't completely carry a team and win it all like Dirk did in 2011.
Duncan is top 10, right there with Hakeem and Shaq, IMO.