- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 30,565
- Reaction Score
- 52,947
Tryst, eh?
Inappropriate, like the Yahoo headline about the PSU sex scandal.
You left out the part about him telling Paterno. Pretty big omission on your part. And the police knew in 1998, are you angry with them?
I hope the DOJ gets involved because I think there are too many Pennsylvania ducks in the water to ensure a thorough or credible investigation. Or conversely, maybe they will be thorough, but skeptics like myself will question it. So if they are innocent they should welcome a DOJ investigation.Nan, excellent question. I did a quick search and there is a provision in the federal Mann Act, specifically US Code 18 USC 2423(a), which makes it a federal crime to transport an individual under the age of 18 "with intent that the individual engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 10 years or for life."
There may be other federal laws implicated. I've heard RICO mentioned, but that would arise if evidence indicates a conspiracy to cover up crimes.
The significance of federal involvement -- which you rightly mention in the context of the trip to Texas for the bowl game -- is not the potential penalty, but rather to bring the investigative powers and personnel of the US Dept of Justice to the investigation of Sandusky. It'll be interesting to see whether the DOJ gets involved or leaves it to the state(s).
I hope the DOJ gets involved because I think there are too many Pennsylvania ducks in the water to ensure a thorough or credible investigation. Or conversely, maybe they will be thorough, but skeptics like myself will question it. So if they are innocent they should welcome a DOJ investigation.
I hope the DOJ gets involved because I think there are too many Pennsylvania ducks in the water to ensure a thorough or credible investigation. Or conversely, maybe they will be thorough, but skeptics like myself will question it. So if they are innocent they should welcome a DOJ investigation.
I have no first hand knowledge to disagree with you. I can only speak in general terms. The problem may not be with people you know. It may be with people who can influence people you know who have vested interests with PSU.I understand why you might think this way but I'm very confident that the investigation by the PA state police and the AG's office will be extremely thorough and credible. I worked for the PA Atty Gen back in the 80's (non-criminal) and I was extremely impressed with the AG's and State Police's press conference on Monday. The current Governor of PA, Corbett, was the Atty General when the Sandusky investigation was initiated in 2008 and thus has a vested interest in how this investigation and prosecution turns out. As mentioned in another post, Corbett reportedly was a strong influence in the BOT's decision to fire Paterno. As Corbett said the other day, the entire nation is watching. That's not to say that the DOJ won't initiate its own investigation and/or work with the state team. We'll have to wait and see. But I think the state investigators are motivated to do an outstanding job.
I understand why you might think this way but I'm very confident that the investigation by the PA state police and the AG's office will be extremely thorough and credible. I worked for the PA Atty Gen back in the 80's (non-criminal) and I was extremely impressed with the AG's and State Police's press conference on Monday. The current Governor of PA, Corbett, was the Atty General when the Sandusky investigation was initiated in 2008 and thus has a vested interest in how this investigation and prosecution turns out. As mentioned in another post, Corbett reportedly was a strong influence in the BOT's decision to fire Paterno. As Corbett said the other day, the entire nation is watching. That's not to say that the DOJ won't initiate its own investigation and/or work with the state team. We'll have to wait and see. But I think the state investigators are motivated to do an outstanding job.
Just to add to the weirdness, Jerry Sandusky was a commencement speaker in 2007. This is starting to look more and more like the Catholic Church scandals.
http://live.psu.edu/story/24106
-- 3 p.m.: The College of Health and Human Development commencement ceremony in the Bryce Jordan Center. Jerry Sandusky, founder of The Second Mile, will speak.
The investigation was handed off to the AG in 2005. Not 2008. They initiated the 2008 investigation AFTER victim #1 came forward about a 2008 incident. There is some exposure here for the governor for those who wonder what his office did with the case in those 3 years. As well, Corbett and PSU (including Spanier) have been in full-scale battle over the last year over finances. There're questions here about the evolution of this investigation, Grticar's disappearance, the way Madeira handed the case off to Corbett, Corbett's political enemies, and most importantly, what's been done about the case when it was in Corbett's hands.
No doubt. He knows what his fate will be in prison. He will wait until right before the trial starts and then will commit suicide. The only question is will he 'turn' and give the details of all of his crimes and who was involved with the molestation and cover-up, or will he take that information to his grave. But I agree...this ends up with Sandusky taking his own life.
What was being investigated in 2005? By then Gricar had already decided not to prosecute the allegations concerning Victim 6 and he disappeared. The allegations concerning Victim 1 occurred in 2008 and were handed over by Madiera to the AG's office in 2009 (I mistakenly said 2008 above). Corbett was elected Gov in 2010 and took office Jan 2011. I must have missed something but I'm not sure what was being investigated in 2005.
I thought Madeira transferred the file over to the AD because of the Gricar disappearance. I thought that's what constituted the "conflict of interest" that Madeira cited in handing things over.
to transfer the documents over to the AG. He cited a conflict of interest.
It's incredible to think that the police and the state child protection services people lectured Sandusky about showering with children as a result of that investigation.
The transfer of a file is really more ministerial. It's really a transfer of jurisdiction to prosecute. Normally the prosecution of Sandusky would have been a local District Atty matter. The local DA (Madiera) claimed there was a conflict of interest and essentially asked the AG to take over the investigation and prosecution. The AG agreed and opened its own investigation in 2009. I'm sure the investigative files were transferred to the AG/state police. I've not read what the conflict was the prompted Madiera to ask the AG to take over. I actually have a lot of confidence in the state police and AG Kelly. We'll see.
Disagree. I think this ends with someone else taking Sandusky's, and make it look like a suicide. There are a lot of very powerful people that wish he was dead right now. Someone will get to him, and we will never know the extent of the abuse or the coverup.
Any explanation for the switch?Thanks. I've actually read that the governor asked another prosecutor in the office to take over, someone other than Kelly. I read that today.
Any explanation for the switch?

Disagree. I think this ends with someone else taking Sandusky's, and make it look like a suicide. There are a lot of very powerful people that wish he was dead right now. Someone will get to him, and we will never know the extent of the abuse or the coverup.
According to reports, former PSU football players are donating money to Sandusky for his legal defense. It is amazing that people within the 'Penn State Cult' still believe that someone's tenure as football coach still outweighs his actions raping young boys for 15 years! Wow!![]()
According to reports, former PSU football players are donating money to Sandusky for his legal defense. It is amazing that people within the 'Penn State Cult' still believe that someone's tenure as football coach still outweighs his actions raping young boys for 15 years! Wow!![]()
It was some guy from the 1950s who donated $100. I highly doubt it's pervasive. The guy was Sandusky's friend.
It's a former player from the 70's who played in the NFL who has gotten 75 other former players to show up for the Nebraska game in support and they are trying to raise money for Sandusky. Is it still not pervasive?
It's a former player from the 70's who played in the NFL who has gotten 75 other former players to show up for the Nebraska game in support and they are trying to raise money for Sandusky. Is it still not pervasive?
Pervasive? NO
Perverse , YES
How many people supported Hitler? You still behind the numbers game there too?
No, the player from the 70s asked people to come to the game to show support for Penn State.
This has nothing to do with the guy donating money to Sandusky. None of these guys are donating money. The 1970s guy is a well-known player and former NFLer. The other guy is 78 and never played under Paterno.
Here's the article: http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/7220097/penn-state-nittany-lions-rally-program
The 70s player is Rich Mauti. His son Mike is a starting linebacker.