- Joined
- Dec 14, 2015
- Messages
- 10,576
- Reaction Score
- 69,957
So if 5th best player means you aren't great. Which one of those guys in 23 weren't great. Be consistent. Stop arbitrarily changing the qualification.It matters in the context of him being called one of the best players ever at UConn. I'm not even sure who I would say was the 5th best player on the '23 team but Sanogo, Clingan, Newton, Jackson, Hawkins were all better than him. Of course AK being the 5th and 6th best player on those teams showed the greatness of those teams. He was incredible in his role on those teams.
You're proving my point. "He was the 5th best player" is so dumb without the context of who the other guys were. "5th best player" is not a disqualification. So why keep using it?
Calling Alex an all time great was never about talent. And you know that. Which is what makes this crusade odd. It's an unnecessary dig at a guy whose leaving this program WAY better than what he found it.