Credit to Spanos

[Bongo Fury]

If morehead is coaching, he’ll be calling plays.

 

[Ldandy]

Credit to Spanos for doing what Randy couldn't do in five years. Have a team take the field that looked like it was excited to play a football game. "Want to" goes a long way in sports.

 

[Ldandy]

It’s a big if, but if we can get Morehead as HC, keep Mazzone as OC, keep Spanos as DC, that combination of coaching talent could definitely put points on the board. Of course it would be up to JM, and it’s always possible he’d want to bring in his own people. I’d also keep Rose as a graduate assistant if he wants it.

No one is getting retained nor should they. The next coach is going to want as much distance from the stink of the Edsall Regime as he can possibly get. Spanos and Mazzone are good minds. They'll get analyst jobs somewhere. The rest of the staff is going to really have to work for their next opportunity.

 

[CONN78SEJ]

No one is getting retained nor should they. The next coach is going to want as much distance from the stink of the Edsall Regime as he can possibly get. Spanos and Mazzone are good minds. They'll get analyst jobs somewhere. The rest of the staff is going to really have to work for their next opportunity.

Well then I guess you wouldn’t want Morehead either as he was part of the Edsall regime, Edsall hired him. Mazzone has no connection with Edsall whatsoever, DB hired him. I did say in my post that if JM was hired, any retention of a coach would be up to him.

 

[Chief00]

We need to get 3-4 good OL out of the transfer portal. Another 3-4 starter types scattered at the 3 levels on defense.

 

[metsfan2323]

If morehead is coaching, he’ll be calling plays.

Speaking of Moorhead, the offense we were running yesterday is very much like the offense Moorhead ran with Nebrich at Fordham. If you are a Moorhead guy you have to be impressed with Mazzone.

Something we hopefully learned from 2011 is that if you have a qualified candidate in house it's OK to hire the in house candidate. If we had hired Moorhead in 2011 the nightmare of the last eleven years would have never happened.

 

[Ldandy]

Well then I guess you wouldn’t want Morehead either as he was part of the Edsall regime, Edsall hired him. Mazzone has no connection with Edsall whatsoever, DB hired him. I did say in my post that if JM was hired, any retention of a coach would be up to him.

I didn't realize that Moorhead was a part of the boondoggle that was Edsall 2.0. I understand that Mazzone has no connection to Randy, however it doesn't change the fact that he is essentially a band-aid on a gun shot wound applied by AD Dave to make up for the complete lack of offensive brain trust Randy assembled.

No coach worth a damn is retaining anyone from a team that has won Less than 10 games in 5 years. Please explain to me why you would even advocate for it? Spanos is clearly a nice guy, however as DC his defense was giving up massive amounts of yards and points. You want that to continue? Clean break from the last few years including this one is desperately needed.

Your post is a perfect example of this strange fascination of Uconn Fans who seem to think that the most important prerequisite to hiring Uconn Football Coaches is did they ever coach at Uconn? If no, did they ever step foot in New England? There are tons of bright young offensive Head Coaches at The FCS and G5 Level to consider as well as those in the OC Ranks. Despite that the two names that come up first and second as HC are Moorhead and Lashlee. One isn't coming and the other isn't even worth discussing. Guys like Spanos or Mazzone shouldn't even be on the radar for staff positions.

 

[McLovin]

I’m really disappointed he is “succeeding” (aka getting way more from this team than FHCRE2.0).

We need to go out and hire someone external with an offensive background to turn this thing around long term. But Spanos could play his team into the “safe choice” for AD David Benedict if he continues to move the team in this direction.

p.s. I’m not actually disappointed at all. He has this team watchable again for the first time in 4 years. But we do need an external hire with a good track record as HC.

 

[CONN78SEJ]

Speaking of Moorhead, the offense we were running yesterday is very much like the offense Moorhead ran with Nebrich at Fordham. If you are a Moorhead guy you have to be impressed with Mazzone.

Something we hopefully learned from 2011 is that if you have a qualified candidate in house it's OK to hire the in house candidate. If we had hired Moorhead in 2011 the nightmare of the last eleven years would have never happened.

Hathaway was clueless on football, he never would’ve hired Morehead. Best thing Mr Burton ever did for UConn besides all the donations was having Hathaway fired.

 

[CONN78SEJ]

I didn't realize that Moorhead was a part of the boondoggle that was Edsall 2.0. I understand that Mazzone has no connection to Randy, however it doesn't change the fact that he is essentially a band-aid on a gun shot wound applied by AD Dave to make up for the complete lack of offensive brain trust Randy assembled.

Guys like Spanos or Mazzone shouldn't even be on the radar for staff positions.

Well I guess, judging from the way we played yesterday, at least that “bandaid” stopped the bleeding. I hope you’re not saying Benedict was at fault for all this. Benedict never wanted to rehire Edsall in the first place. You don’t have a clue about football, go back to the basketball board. Nice pat on the back you gave Spanos and Mazzone. You should put one of your bandaids on your mouth.

 

[Exit 4]

Credit to Spanos indeed. From what I hear the kids really like everything he is doing. New positive at atmosphere is extremely welcome.

Yesterday was a big step in a new direction. Lots more to be done, but now -for once- we are seeing both players and play calling improve.

Vanderbilt maybe awful, but we will need everything we got next week. I’m sure Vandy, hungry for a win, will deliver a big effort.

 

[Nostical]

Look, we're hiring a new HC--not retaining and elevating anyone on this staff. The new HC gets to pick his staff. If he decides to retain any ass't that's his choice. As for the benefit of having Mazzone on board--even for two weeks, it's affirms just how absurd it was to think (due in part to budget issues) that OL coach Giufre would be acceptable at the OC spot. For while exceptions certainly exist, most times in life you get what you pay for. That's why the budget for the new regime will be more than most anticipate. The reality has been made clear to most of the decision makers. No halfway measures will right this ship. And that makes me more of an optimist than delusional.

 

[Husky68]

Only thing I can think of is that Edsall was playing the long game and trying to redshirt him. Besides Edsall never loved playing fast Always wanted to shorten the game for the defense. Tyler’s raw but so much better than SK and JZ

He is so much better than SK? Guess I don't see it in performance in these two games. SK played so poorly that bar is very low for being better. Here are the QBR ratings for UConn's 4 FCS games with the opponents rating also. Not sure what the ratings cover but they must be some type of indication of good or bad play with higher numbers being better.

Fresno State - JZ 17.7 opponent 58.5
Purdue - SK 43.3 opponent 94.9
Army - TP 15.3 opponent 94.0
Wyoming - TP 37.6 opponent 31.8

As additional info JZ QBR against HC was 5.0; don't think have ever seen a single digit number for a QB who played a whole game. Stats are from ESPN.

So whatever the QBR ratings mean SK in the 1st game after HCRE2.0 getting the boot, Spanos's 1st game ever as head coach and without the "offensive consultant" who has put some deception in UConn's play calling - had a better rating than either of TP's games. And Purdue's defense is at least as good as Army and Wyoming (although TP had to face Wyoming's 1st string defense the whole game).

Several points. It makes no sense that HCRE2.0 could have picked JZ as starting QB. TP may be "so much better" than JZ (at least the JZ of the 1st two games this year) but has not shown out as so much better than SK.

TP seems more mobile and had rushing yards of 60 and 14 in two games but SK was leading UConn rusher against Purdue with 42 yards.

The "eye" test is whatever you see. I see SK as better/more accurate passer and throws less into danger balls (very important to me in QB), mobile enough but not as quick as TP. Does TP rally the troops better, "make plays", etc. I can't tell.

Not saying go to SK when he's ok again (although I would), just saying TP's performance to date (not saying his upside) is not "so much better" than SK's.

 

[Ldandy]

Well I guess, judging from the way we played yesterday, at least that “bandaid” stopped the bleeding. I hope you’re not saying Benedict was at fault for all this. Benedict never wanted to rehire Edsall in the first place. You don’t have a clue about football, go back to the basketball board. Nice pat on the back you gave Spanos and Mazzone. You should put one of your bandaids on your mouth.

I could GAF about basketball, and every time you respond it reveals just a bit more. Let’s see if we can keep Cory on staff along with your dream staff of Spanos and Mazzone. I heard he’s a great recruiter LOL

 

[metsfan2323]

I could GAF about basketball, and every time you respond it reveals just a bit more. Let’s see if we can keep Cory on staff along with your dream staff of Spanos and Mazzone. I heard he’s a great recruiter LOL

If we fire the current staff to bring in a better staff the decision makers better get it right this time. A lot of us like what we saw yesterday, the fear is the people doing the hiring are still the same clowns who whiffed on the last three hires.

 

[metsfan2323]

That's why the budget for the new regime will be more than most anticipate.

This does nothing for me. PP was given a substantial amount of money to burn the place down. Diaco was given a substantial amount of money to burn the place down. Giving a lot of money to idiots just makes wealthy idiots.

Tell me what is different about the qualifications we are looking for this time around.

The new coach better have a recent history of high scoring offenses and winning football games. Find that person or just keep the current staff for another year on a trial/prove it type contract we gave Ollie in 2012.

Learn from history or be doomed to repeating it.

 

[Bongo Fury]

He is so much better than SK? Guess I don't see it in performance in these two games. SK played so poorly that bar is very low for being better. Here are the QBR ratings for UConn's 4 FCS games with the opponents rating also. Not sure what the ratings cover but they must be some type of indication of good or bad play with higher numbers being better.

Fresno State - JZ 17.7 opponent 58.5
Purdue - SK 43.3 opponent 94.9
Army - TP 15.3 opponent 94.0
Wyoming - TP 37.6 opponent 31.8

As additional info JZ QBR against HC was 5.0; don't think have ever seen a single digit number for a QB who played a whole game. Stats are from ESPN.

So whatever the QBR ratings mean SK in the 1st game after HCRE2.0 getting the boot, Spanos's 1st game ever as head coach and without the "offensive consultant" who has put some deception in UConn's play calling - had a better rating than either of TP's games. And Purdue's defense is at least as good as Army and Wyoming (although TP had to face Wyoming's 1st string defense the whole game).

Several points. It makes no sense that HCRE2.0 could have picked JZ as starting QB. TP may be "so much better" than JZ (at least the JZ of the 1st two games this year) but has not shown out as so much better than SK.

TP seems more mobile and had rushing yards of 60 and 14 in two games but SK was leading UConn rusher against Purdue with 42 yards.

The "eye" test is whatever you see. I see SK as better/more accurate passer and throws less into danger balls (very important to me in QB), mobile enough but not as quick as TP. Does TP rally the troops better, "make plays", etc. I can't tell.

Not saying go to SK when he's ok again (although I would), just saying TP's performance to date (not saying his upside) is not "so much better" than SK's.

Hey RE wanted a QB that wasn’t afraid of making mistakes. Oops

 

[Huskyforlife]

If he wins 3 or 4 games he'll be considered. The players would probably clamor for him back.

 

[CONN78SEJ]

If we fire the current staff to bring in a better staff the decision makers better get it right this time. A lot of us like what we saw yesterday, the fear is the people doing the hiring are still the same clowns who whiffed on the last three hires.

I’m a big fan of Dave Benedict, think he is the best AD since Toner. I’m confident he will make as good a choice as he did when he hired Hurley, and I hope the BOT will go along it. People forget that against his better judgment, DB had to go along with hiring Randy 2.0. If he was calling the shots back then, I don’t think Edsall would have gotten the job. So to a certain degree, the “same clowns” are not doing the hiring this time around.

 

[CONN78SEJ]

I could GAF about basketball, and every time you respond it reveals just a bit more. Let’s see if we can keep Cory on staff along with your dream staff of Spanos and Mazzone. I heard he’s a great recruiter LOL

Ok

 

[CONN78SEJ]

He is so much better than SK? Guess I don't see it in performance in these two games. SK played so poorly that bar is very low for being better. Here are the QBR ratings for UConn's 4 FCS games with the opponents rating also. Not sure what the ratings cover but they must be some type of indication of good or bad play with higher numbers being better.

Fresno State - JZ 17.7 opponent 58.5
Purdue - SK 43.3 opponent 94.9
Army - TP 15.3 opponent 94.0
Wyoming - TP 37.6 opponent 31.8

As additional info JZ QBR against HC was 5.0; don't think have ever seen a single digit number for a QB who played a whole game. Stats are from ESPN.

So whatever the QBR ratings mean SK in the 1st game after HCRE2.0 getting the boot, Spanos's 1st game ever as head coach and without the "offensive consultant" who has put some deception in UConn's play calling - had a better rating than either of TP's games. And Purdue's defense is at least as good as Army and Wyoming (although TP had to face Wyoming's 1st string defense the whole game).

Several points. It makes no sense that HCRE2.0 could have picked JZ as starting QB. TP may be "so much better" than JZ (at least the JZ of the 1st two games this year) but has not shown out as so much better than SK.

TP seems more mobile and had rushing yards of 60 and 14 in two games but SK was leading UConn rusher against Purdue with 42 yards.

The "eye" test is whatever you see. I see SK as better/more accurate passer and throws less into danger balls (very important to me in QB), mobile enough but not as quick as TP. Does TP rally the troops better, "make plays", etc. I can't tell.

Not saying go to SK when he's ok again (although I would), just saying TP's performance to date (not saying his upside) is not "so much better" than SK's.

SK is definitely a more accurate passer than TP, but TP’s speed in the open field if he breaks one or two tackles, makes him much more of a threat than SK to opposing defensive schemes. His threat to run with it and being an ok passer makes him dangerous, as is his ability to get away from defenders and make something out of nothing.

 

[jbdphi]

He is so much better than SK? Guess I don't see it in performance in these two games. SK played so poorly that bar is very low for being better. Here are the QBR ratings for UConn's 4 FCS games with the opponents rating also. Not sure what the ratings cover but they must be some type of indication of good or bad play with higher numbers being better.

Fresno State - JZ 17.7 opponent 58.5
Purdue - SK 43.3 opponent 94.9
Army - TP 15.3 opponent 94.0
Wyoming - TP 37.6 opponent 31.8

As additional info JZ QBR against HC was 5.0; don't think have ever seen a single digit number for a QB who played a whole game. Stats are from ESPN.

So whatever the QBR ratings mean SK in the 1st game after HCRE2.0 getting the boot, Spanos's 1st game ever as head coach and without the "offensive consultant" who has put some deception in UConn's play calling - had a better rating than either of TP's games. And Purdue's defense is at least as good as Army and Wyoming (although TP had to face Wyoming's 1st string defense the whole game).

Several points. It makes no sense that HCRE2.0 could have picked JZ as starting QB. TP may be "so much better" than JZ (at least the JZ of the 1st two games this year) but has not shown out as so much better than SK.

TP seems more mobile and had rushing yards of 60 and 14 in two games but SK was leading UConn rusher against Purdue with 42 yards.

The "eye" test is whatever you see. I see SK as better/more accurate passer and throws less into danger balls (very important to me in QB), mobile enough but not as quick as TP. Does TP rally the troops better, "make plays", etc. I can't tell.

Not saying go to SK when he's ok again (although I would), just saying TP's performance to date (not saying his upside) is not "so much better" than SK's.

There are so many variables that go into this, most importantly the plays called and the quality of the defense. I still haven't been able to see SK play a game as I can't find any replay of the Purdue game or the UCF game from 2019 but my "contra" opinion is that while TP has certainly brought life and excitement to the offense that showed in the second half vs Army and in the WYO game, most of that is due to play calling. Yes, TP has good pocket presence which helps him a lot to extend plays but he short-armed a ton of passes and made some poor decisions both passing and running the ball. As a freshman, you'd expect that and I'm not blaming him or anything but I have to think that with better play calling and a slightly softer defense (i.e. Wyoming as opposed to Purdue), SK could have potentially accomplished similar if not better results?

TP's two big plays this season have been 1) a 30 something yard run where the last 90% of the run was a stroll once he got through the line, and 2) a TD pass on a reverse flea flicker. Once again, he's brought excitement and optimism and his escapability in the pocket could be something I've underestimated, but I don't think he is definitively our best option at QB.

 

[Life Is Good]

He is so much better than SK? Guess I don't see it in performance in these two games. SK played so poorly that bar is very low for being better. Here are the QBR ratings for UConn's 4 FCS games with the opponents rating also. Not sure what the ratings cover but they must be some type of indication of good or bad play with higher numbers being better.

Fresno State - JZ 17.7 opponent 58.5
Purdue - SK 43.3 opponent 94.9
Army - TP 15.3 opponent 94.0
Wyoming - TP 37.6 opponent 31.8

As additional info JZ QBR against HC was 5.0; don't think have ever seen a single digit number for a QB who played a whole game. Stats are from ESPN.

So whatever the QBR ratings mean SK in the 1st game after HCRE2.0 getting the boot, Spanos's 1st game ever as head coach and without the "offensive consultant" who has put some deception in UConn's play calling - had a better rating than either of TP's games. And Purdue's defense is at least as good as Army and Wyoming (although TP had to face Wyoming's 1st string defense the whole game).

Several points. It makes no sense that HCRE2.0 could have picked JZ as starting QB. TP may be "so much better" than JZ (at least the JZ of the 1st two games this year) but has not shown out as so much better than SK.

TP seems more mobile and had rushing yards of 60 and 14 in two games but SK was leading UConn rusher against Purdue with 42 yards.

The "eye" test is whatever you see. I see SK as better/more accurate passer and throws less into danger balls (very important to me in QB), mobile enough but not as quick as TP. Does TP rally the troops better, "make plays", etc. I can't tell.

Not saying go to SK when he's ok again (although I would), just saying TP's performance to date (not saying his upside) is not "so much better" than SK's.

If Krajewski got half the chance as JZ this discussion would not even be open for debate.

 

[kemba]

Krajewski has gotten a raw deal. That said as of now TP deserves to start. Doesn't mean Krajewski won't get another shot either because of injuries or poor play.

 

[Woof 101]

People forget that against his better judgment, DB had to go along with hiring Randy 2.0. If he was calling the shots back then, I don’t think Edsall would have gotten the job. So to a certain degree, the “same clowns” are not doing the hiring this time around.

ABSOLUTELY NO ATTACK on you personally.
I also like DB but please do supply a link showing how he hired RE against his better judgement. Nowhere have I ever read the hire was forced on him. He praised getting Randy back to the max. Then when things were in doubt a few years later gave him just as much praise and support.
The only one I would consider a forced hire is PP and that was on Larry McHugh who had a ton of influence on the board. A tireless life long worker and former high school championship winning coach he had a lot of juice on the board. A personal friend of Paul, he let that get in the way of modern times football. A good man but the game had passed him and Paul and George by....

To my original point please show something showing DB was reluctant to hiring Randy. He was all in on everything I had read and smiling ear to ear as he introduced him at the introduction party. I get AD's are salesmen but most believe in the product they are selling. Inquiring minds want to know.

 

[Rosebud70]

Look at overall team stats sk vs Purduethen tp vs army and Wyoming and then jz vs Fresno. Sks team stats are better. Sk didn’t score however there was Atleast 3 Poetential tds left due to no team support

 

[Rosebud70]

He is so much better than SK? Guess I don't see it in performance in these two games. SK played so poorly that bar is very low for being better. Here are the QBR ratings for UConn's 4 FCS games with the opponents rating also. Not sure what the ratings cover but they must be some type of indication of good or bad play with higher numbers being better.

Fresno State - JZ 17.7 opponent 58.5
Purdue - SK 43.3 opponent 94.9
Army - TP 15.3 opponent 94.0
Wyoming - TP 37.6 opponent 31.8

As additional info JZ QBR against HC was 5.0; don't think have ever seen a single digit number for a QB who played a whole game. Stats are from ESPN.

So whatever the QBR ratings mean SK in the 1st game after HCRE2.0 getting the boot, Spanos's 1st game ever as head coach and without the "offensive consultant" who has put some deception in UConn's play calling - had a better rating than either of TP's games. And Purdue's defense is at least as good as Army and Wyoming (although TP had to face Wyoming's 1st string defense the whole game).

Several points. It makes no sense that HCRE2.0 could have picked JZ as starting QB. TP may be "so much better" than JZ (at least the JZ of the 1st two games this year) but has not shown out as so much better than SK.

TP seems more mobile and had rushing yards of 60 and 14 in two games but SK was leading UConn rusher against Purdue with 42 yards.

The "eye" test is whatever you see. I see SK as better/more accurate passer and throws less into danger balls (very important to me in QB), mobile enough but not as quick as TP. Does TP rally the troops better, "make plays", etc. I can't tell.

Not saying go to SK when he's ok again (although I would), just saying TP's performance to date (not saying his upside) is not "so much better" than SK's.

Not only vs post Edsall or spanos first game. How about the fact he played a big ten team thats 3-1. With a top 15 DE. I don’t see TP performing like that against Purdue. And as I said before 6/23 in second half is not good. I strongly feel with sk passing ability and the plays that were called against Wyoming we have a comfortable win. And a win vs holy cross if sk plays. Army idk about a win but definitely closer we should be 2-2

 

[CL82]

Benedict never wanted to rehire Edsall in the first place

Link?

 

[CL82]

Look at overall team stats sk vs Purduethen tp vs army and Wyoming and then jz vs Fresno. Sks team stats are better. Sk didn’t score however there was Atleast 3 Poetential tds left due to no team support

Man, you are such a one note fiddle.

 

[uconnbill]

Spanos is a professional which seems to be missing from Edsall 2.0 he saw issues and looked for ways to fix them instead of doing the same thing and hoping for a better outcome.

Remember he was with the Steelers for a number of years and learned much from the organization and coaching staff while he was there. He knows how to win.