whaler11
Head Happy Hour Coach
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 44,359
- Reaction Score
- 68,225
Academics vs. athletics
Because this is earth and we are bound to the rules of physics.
Academics vs. athletics
Seriously. You are smart.
There is a ocean sized gulf between meeting the standard and 1000.
Rewarding him for hitting 1000 does exactly what Chief says.
Pay him for staying eligible - don’t pay him for maxing out a stupid metric that gives him a reason not to push for some kids with questionable academics.
If you think you can win with a bunch of bookworms you can’t. If you are so blind to this reality go root for Trinity and stop rooting to destroy this basketball program.
I still don't understand why we don't do what every other major college program does. Just make it happen and forget about it.
Seriously. You are smart.
There is a ocean sized gulf between meeting the standard and 1000.
Rewarding him for hitting 1000 does exactly what Chief says.
Pay him for staying eligible - don’t pay him for maxing out a stupid metric that gives him a reason not to push for some kids with questionable academics.
If you think you can win with a bunch of bookworms you can’t. If you are so blind to this reality go root for Trinity and stop rooting to destroy this basketball program.
Seriously. You are smart.
There is a ocean sized gulf between meeting the standard and 1000.
Rewarding him for hitting 1000 does exactly what Chief says.
Pay him for staying eligible - don’t pay him for maxing out a stupid metric that gives him a reason not to push for some kids with questionable academics.
If you think you can win with a bunch of bookworms you can’t. If you are so blind to this reality go root for Trinity and stop rooting to destroy this basketball program.
There's no point in paying him to stay eligible. If the team isn't eligible with our history, you're firing him anyways. In that case, you're just paying him to not be fired aka a salary. There is no incentive.
APR is not a forgiving metric. One mistake-filled semester lingers for years and can affect the team even after you fire the coach responsible. Setting the goal far above the requirement ensures a safety net.
You also reference winning with bookworms. We both know the intelligence of players has 0 to do with APR and referencing that is asinine. With personal tutors. specific class choices and only requiring players to stay eligible (not exactly graduate with Latin honors), it's only a matter of ensuring your players are not willfully ignoring classwork entirely.
My God even the smart people have lost it this week.
Nobody outside of the MEAC and SWAC is ever ineligible based off the APR. It’s literally next to zero. It’s impossible to botch unless your administration is working against you.
Every legitimate basketball school in the country solved this by ending the pretense they are there for school.
Why does everyone but UConn understand this?
Moran, you're not even addressing the argument. This board is full of illiterate half-blood princes.
Of course our administration should rig the academics. Hopefully they are. For PR reasons and to maintain #casualfan illusions, we still need to have a Coach APR bonus.
But if we're paying the money, we might as well have the bonus do something. And the hair-brained idea of a bonus for just staying eligible still does nothing. We can at least have the coach try for a safety net if we accidentally grade stuff.
Let me do a whaler impression.
Sorry, I slipped in a few Chief memes.
The only problem is it fuels the narrative that the APR is a legitimate measure and that we're apologetic for having run afoul of it. Why do we give people like Emmert credence? Giving KO his first contract because of first-semester grades in 2012 was the same way.
Seriously. You are smart.
There is a ocean sized gulf between meeting the standard and 1000.
Rewarding him for hitting 1000 does exactly what Chief says.
Pay him for staying eligible - don’t pay him for maxing out a stupid metric that gives him a reason not to push for some kids with questionable academics.
If you think you can win with a bunch of bookworms you can’t. If you are so blind to this reality go root for Trinity and stop rooting to destroy this basketball program.
Not really. You need a 4 year average score of 930 to stay eligible. If each player can earn 4 points and you have 13 scholarship players it only takes losing 4 points to knock your score down to 923. Two kids transferring while in bad academic standing kills the score
What would the punishment be? You can't go to class anymore? If they needed to expel a player they could petition the NCAA for an adjustment.
Kentucky regularly gets scores of 1000 and they don't have a bunch of book worms. It's a score that is easily gamed, and there isn't any reason not to game it.
Is Chief seriously still arguing that the Mike Noyes scholarship, awarded in August/September, could have instead been given to someone who could’ve contributed on the court meaningfully that year?
Why do any of you continue to give him the time of day?
I fully support gaming it.
That’s the point, UConn doesn’t. Kentucky games it because they don’t treat the kids as students.
If UConn is going to apply the academic standards of Kentucky or UNC it means nothing to offer the incentive.
They haven’t. So it shouldn’t be a goal.
They need to win, win fast and win pretty big. There shouldn’t be a competing priority around some dopey metric that measures nothing.
Here is the reality of the APR.
Somehow EVERYONE outside the MEAC and SWAC avoids but UConn needs to reach for the stars!
17 D-I teams don't make NCAA grade, banned from postseason
I know it sucks when Chief is right. But sometimes he is.
The Drummond story was absolutely true. Why would I make it up - like no one would notice he wasn’t at Gampel. His plans changed and it took awhile before it got fully communicated to everyone - yes including the b!t(he’s. Not rocket science but so hard for some minds to comprehend.This is a message board and people clearly like playing characters. This is the only reason I've been able to come up with considering the Drummond story...
The Drummond story was absolutely true. Why would I make it up - like no one would notice he wasn’t at Gampel. His plans changed and it took awhile before it got fully communicated to everyone - yes including the b!t(he’s. Not rocket science but so hard for some minds to comprehend.
People who refer to themselves in the third person cannot be trusted. Chief is fools gold
No it wasn’t. But it doesn’t matter I’m not arguing with you. We don’t know each other it doesn’t matter. Just know that story isn’t true.
Let's go back to a time before we cared about APR and lost scholarships and eventually got banned from the NCAA tourney. That was great