Coaching Issue? | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Coaching Issue?

Status
Not open for further replies.
There have been 4 coaches since finishing above .500.
You telling me every single coach the problem?

I wound say the biggest issue is they need a power conference to compete as a power conference team.

Same thing happened to hoops in the AAC. They didn’t recruit while there. They got into big east, they recruited.

UConn is going to do well in its non power conference portion of schedule. The chasm between these power teams and the g5 are huge. The gap is accelerating.

The team isn’t going g to be able to compete until they are on a level playing. Field.

It really looked like UConn was playing a team from higher division.
 
Least experienced BIG 10 team is going a bit far... They were ACC for 60 years before even switching leagues.
Im talking about LEAST experienced playing roster. Not as a program. The roster is 95th according to Phil Steele in experienced players.
 
Same thing happened to hoops in the AAC. They didn’t recruit while there. They got into big east, they recruited.
Mmmm, did something else happen that might've impacted our recruiting and our play?

(Here's a hint: See the title of this thread for a clue.)
 
Last edited:
There have been 4 coaches since finishing above .500.
You telling me every single coach the problem?

I wound say the biggest issue is they need a power conference to compete as a power conference team.

Same thing happened to hoops in the AAC. They didn’t recruit while there. They got into big east, they recruited.

UConn is going to do well in its non power conference portion of schedule. The chasm between these power teams and the g5 are huge. The gap is accelerating.

The team isn’t going g to be able to compete until they are on a level playing. Field.

It really looked like UConn was playing a team from higher division.
Uh yeah. The coaches ARE potentially the problem. Since Edsall round 1.

Not exactly coaches that built anything after or were ascending with experience. Lets go through them.

-Pasqualoni was about 10 years too late. Well into his 60's, he was out of coaching essentially for 7 years after running the "Cuse into the ground. The Burton family hated the hiring so much they pulled all there $$. Looks like they were correct in that assessment of PP. Hes bounced around not landing in one place more than a year or so ever since and is now in the UFL.

-Bob Diaco was a decent hire and was making waves in college football world but had not been a DC more than 3 years and had VERY little experience and this was his first HC job. He has flamed out and bounced around everywhere and is now no longer tasked as a DC anymore anywhere. LB coach which is a major step down and only because he has a relationship with Brian Kelly at LSU-saw him on TV yesterday getting his @ss chewed out.

- Randy Round 2 was much like PP. A coach that had flamed out and made his $$ and was essentially no longer fully invested. I appreciate what Randy round 1 did for the football program and I will always say his job was one of the best I've seen in college from where he took them to where he ended up. I wish he had never left, but he did. But you could see Randy round 2 didn't have the fire that Randy round 1 had almost from the get go. He had made his $$ and was now 60 and over. Seemed like a desperate hire to spark something that was long gone with a coach thinking more about retiring than rebuilding a program again.

-Which brings us to present day Mora. Same kind of thing, older coach, flamed out elsewhere (at a bigger school) and now trying his hand at rebuilding a program at over age 60s+ which is when most are winding down/retiring. Again not saying he cant be the answer but so far its not looking so hot. I hope I'm wrong.

So essentially we seem to be hiring guys who may be past there prime and moving toward retirement age or guys who are so green they have never been an HC before. Where's the Dan Hurley type guys for the football program? I'm not saying a coach as good as Hurley (obviously that's super rare) but a demographic resume LIKE Hurley.....you know, that mid to late 40's guy whos been an HC 3-5+ more years and is still ascending, but not thinking of retiring but not super green with no experience either? That guy, those guys not interested in UConn the last 15 years?
 
.-.
There have been 4 coaches since finishing above .500.
You telling me every single coach the problem?

I wound say the biggest issue is they need a power conference to compete as a power conference team.

Same thing happened to hoops in the AAC. They didn’t recruit while there. They got into big east, they recruited.

UConn is going to do well in its non power conference portion of schedule. The chasm between these power teams and the g5 are huge. The gap is accelerating.

The team isn’t going g to be able to compete until they are on a level playing. Field.

It really looked like UConn was playing a team from higher division.
Yes, every coach has been a major problem.
 
Calm Down Al Pacino GIF
thankfully i am not at the coke-line stage of uconn football fandom yet LOL
So essentially we seem to be hiring guys who may be past there prime and moving toward retirement age or guys who are so green they have never been an HC before. Where's the Dan Hurley type guys for the football program? I'm not saying a coach as good as Hurley (obviously that's super rare) but a demographic resume LIKE Hurley.....you know, that mid to late 40's guy whos been an HC 3-5+ more years and is still ascending, but not thinking of retiring but not super green with no experience either? That guy, those guys not interested in UConn the last 15 years?
I think Bob chesney was that guy, maybe still can be that guy... He beat us with Holy cross in 2021, and I liked him ever since. Now at JMU, they are looking good and better. maybe that ship has sailed, but if we can find the money to get him somehow, i'd be very keen on looking at him, after Mora.

because UConn is not a better program than JMU, we'd need to really figure out $$$ for somone like that, though.
 
thankfully i am not at the coke-line stage of uconn football fandom yet LOL

I think Bob chesney was that guy, maybe still can be that guy... He beat us with Holy cross in 2021, and I liked him ever since. Now at JMU, they are looking good and better. maybe that ship has sailed, but if we can find the money to get him somehow, i'd be very keen on looking at him, after Mora.

because UConn is not a better program than JMU, we'd need to really figure out $$$ for somone like that, though.
agreed not just Chesney, who I agree, I like and fits this demographic -but there's quite a few guys out there just like this even at the FCS level that can be damn good D1 coaches. Id rather take my shot with those types in that demographic than someone with one foot out of the game. Yes if hes good we may consistently lose that type of guy to bigger schools....but there should be a list of guys FBS and FCS level that we are honed in on at all times. Not sure why UConn has not done this of the past 15 years.
 
Merrimack coach is in his first year. Air Force had been #1 or#2 in rushing for the last 5 years according to a graphic in their game. They really gave Air Force fits. Will be interesting to see what they do versus UConn. UConns biggest problem has been in not finding a top level QB. Chesney had Sluka at Holy Cross and they were good for 4 years and he got a bigger job. Mora is all in on Evers and it will determine how long he is at UConn. We still had a talented roster when Bobby Redpants took over. It has been a trainwreck since as Edsall wanted to play freshman when he took over and it was a disaster. I am really tired of being embarrassed on the field. We have the 3rd easiest schedule in FBS. Time to win some ballgames.
 
.-.
I like Jim Mora, thought he was a good hire for a school/history/program like UConn. But one thing is starting to seem clear to me, the players don't seem to get better. I know everyone likes to point to the recruiting and obviously at UConn we are not getting the cream of the crop. But at some point coaches should be getting players better-right? This was clear to me last year when after a good first year (6-7-good in UConn terms, lol) we had one of the 15 most experienced teams coming back last year in the entire NCAA and we go 3-9? That to me speaks to coaching. The longer the players are in your system the worse they seem to get despite playing time and experience which does and should matter in NCAA football. Now year 3 against one of the least experienced B10 teams we lose 50-7 and don't even compete?

I mean, I didn't expect a UConn win on the road against a B10 team but to not compete and show that we are going backwards each year is obviously concerning. Starting to think Mora doesn't have a plan and cant develop players.
Now as time has gone by, we are one of 2 independents and I suspect things are getting tougher as coach of UConn.

but I cannot argue or take issue with any part of your post. If this year continues like last year, then whatever system is in place is not serving us very well.

I think people get on UConn fans for being this over demanding bunch but I don't really see it that way. We just want to team that competes.
 
Well, something to lighten the mood. UConn's performance against Maryland wasn't the worst by a CT team. Central Michigan beat CCSU 66-10.
 
Well, something to lighten the mood. UConn's performance against Maryland wasn't the worst by a CT team. Central Michigan beat CCSU 66-10.
So much for all the top notch high school football talent in Connecticut. Head bang
 
Let’s get real. The coaching is at this point by any measure related to outcome and production, poor. I get bringing in a bunch of new guys doesn’t help, but so are a lot of other squads. There is nothing uniquely different at UConn than any other place, and many respects better than most. Excellent facilities, great school, very good market, nice campus, flagship, better funded than mid-tiers. There is no good excuse. None.
The uniquely different aspect is UConn’s amazing ability to hire old names and not upcoming talent.
If BB took same approach, we’d have Lappas, Lavin, and maybe Crean as ex coaches.
I want to like Mora. Came in with right attitude, said the right things, and brought some credibility.
I think this year will say a lot about progress.
Road opener against BIG opponent is tall order. But we seem to say that about all our opponents. At some point, when teams keep having banner days against you, maybe it’s not that they are so good.
Not going to rush judgment after one game, but it’s sooooooo hard not to feel like we’ve seen this before.
Get a solid win against Merrimack, get the kids feeling like progress is being made, and get some positive vibes flowing.
 
UConn has dropped from 120 to 130 after Saturday's debacle.
ESPN's FPI had Maryland at 27. UConn at 125. What did people think was going to happen with 125 vs 27?
 
.-.
ESPN's FPI had Maryland at 27. UConn at 125. What did people think was going to happen with 125 vs 27?
It’s not surprising that happens when 125 plays 27 on the road, but I think the frustration and surprise comes from the fact we are once again 125.
 
it's the first game of the year. nobody knows what's going to happen. Look at Clemson, FSU and Florida's week.
Post #48 you seem to suggest people should've known what would happen. I didn't expect us to get curbstomped by 43. I didn't expect our offense and defense to look completely lost. I didn't expect the team to be so undisciplined. I didn't expect we wouldn't be able to tackle players. From Mora's post-game comments he didn't expect it either.

You seem to think we all should've expected this. I don't think being pathetically bad should always be expected of UConn football even though it's the norm year after year.
 
it's the first game of the year. nobody knows what's going to happen. Look at Clemson, FSU and Florida's week.
Not sure about Clemson. Played the most loaded team in college football. Clemson defense is elite. Unfortunately Clemson offense is not. Clemson would boat race UConn. Clemson is a better team than Maryland which will be a middle of pack team in the BIG.
 
.-.
Post #48 you seem to suggest people should've known what would happen. I didn't expect us to get curbstomped by 43. I didn't expect our offense and defense to look completely lost. I didn't expect the team to be so undisciplined. I didn't expect we wouldn't be able to tackle players. From Mora's post-game comments he didn't expect it either.

You seem to think we all should've expected this. I don't think being pathetically bad should always be expected of UConn football even though it's the norm year after year.
Good news we did not play a top SEC or BIG team - Alabama, Georgia, Texas, Tennessee, Missouri, Ohio State, Penn Stare. Playing those teams would have been 100-0 and the game may have been called by 3rd QTR.
 
I love Jim Mora, but i think he needs to take a page out of Dad's press conference playbook. put those kids on notice.

"PlAyOfFs???!!! bowl game?! i just hope we can win a GAME!"
 
Why don't we see how this season ends. No one who is a realist expected UConn to beat Maryland. I still think this will be a winning season.
You sound like a typical Uconn fan, let's waste another year! let's give him a chance. We need better coaching period! This team like in the past don't even know how to tackle. But like they say lets give them another year !
 
You sound like a typical Uconn fan, let's waste another year! let's give him a chance. We need better coaching period! This team like in the past don't even know how to tackle. But like they say lets give them another year !
You sound like a typical UConn fan, everything is trash, coaches don't know what they're doing, lets bury the program, fire everybody.
 
ESPN's FPI had Maryland at 27. UConn at 125. What did people think was going to happen with 125 vs 27?
FPI is not a real authority...you really think that Maryland is one of the 30 best teams in the country? Phil Steele is who you should go by. He has them as 10th in B10 and not even Top 50 coming into the season. That's the authority I go by. Not some random number generator.

This Maryland team won 8 games last year, returns less experience this year. They will be around the same with a MUCH weaker schedule this year. This is a middle of the road B10 team who beat us by 43 in a game where we had 2+ months to prepare. Its not a good look and its not acceptable. At least to me its not. A loss is fine and absolute inhalation is not. There were many FCS teams that competed better against better teams this entire weekend.
 
FPI is not a real authority...you really think that Maryland is one of the 30 best teams in the country? Phil Steele is who you should go by. He has them as 10th in B10 and not even Top 50 coming into the season. That's the authority I go by. Not some random number generator.

This Maryland team won 8 games last year, returns less experience this year. They will be around the same with a MUCH weaker schedule this year. This is a middle of the road B10 team who beat us by 43 in a game where we had 2+ months to prepare. Its not a good look and its not acceptable. At least to me its not. A loss is fine and absolute inhalation is not. There were many FCS teams that competed better against better teams this entire weekend.
The operative word is compete in that post
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,214
Messages
4,557,490
Members
10,442
Latest member
StatsMan


Top Bottom