- Joined
- Nov 23, 2011
- Messages
- 1,939
- Reaction Score
- 5,289
It would be so much better if there was football only conferences and all other sports regional conferences. Just separate football and don’t ruin it for everyone else.
Post of the decade.Create a portal for universities to transfer conferences
North Carolina is all south culturally. The academic fit with the BIG is far less important than the southern regional fit of like mindedness. The SEC will be throwing bundles to bring them in. North Carolina is the eastern equivalent of Texas for the SEC.UNC is more of a BIG cultural fit.
North Carolina is all south culturally. The academic fit with the BIG is far less important than the southern regional fit of like mindedness. The SEC will be throwing bundles to bring them in. North Carolina is the eastern equivalent of Texas for the SEC.
Virginia will be the interesting play. My money is they head to the SEC as well.
Clemson is in desperation mode. They were mediocre in football for some time prior to their recent success. I lived in South Carolina for ten years and left the second year of Dabo’s hire. Clemson was despised and laughed at by the majority of people in that state during that period of mediocrity before Sweeney’s hiring.
The longer things play out in the ACC conference the greater the chance of Clemson returning to mediocrity. The University of South Carolina and Florida Gators will vote to keep them and FSU out. FSU is likely B12 bound. Clemson will be in some private school conference unless they can get a slot with one of the big boys soon while the fires are hot.
I wrote it’s very unlikely they get into the SEC. So don’t understand why I need to walk you through something unlikely to happen.Walk me through how finishing 7-5 in the SEC is better for Clemson than 11-1 in the ACC.
Wouldn't that in itself invalidate the agreement?This Clemson/FSU legal action is one of the more surreal cases I have ever seen. The entire case hinges on a contract that none of the members have an actual copy of.
Since it was public knowledge that the agreement was signed, wouldn't there be an applicable statute of limitations on challenging it?I wonder if Clemson's President was also unauthorized to sign the contract--like FSU's President--making the contract automatically void.
That tactic is 100% guaranteed to work!
![]()
The GOR certainly seems punative. As does the large buyout amount.Hard to say, that's why this case will most likely be settled. If FSU and Clemson can prove that a breach of GOR results in a penalty as opposed to a more reasonable monetary damage amount, it will work in their favor. Courts do not generally enforce penalties.
Settling this case will also likely involve the plaintiffs moving on from the ACC. We may see other ACC teams join in on the fun. My guess is that the ACC will get picked over. The remaining teams may try to merge with the Big 12, which is really the only the only plausible reason the ACC took Stanford, Cal and SMU. I think we'll also have a landing spot somewhere.
But where are they going? SEC?
So it's no longer about football?Clemson and FSU have overinflated egos. The crown jewels of the ACC are UNC and Virginia. SEC wants both for their brands and cultural ties, B1G for academics and sports reputations. FSU and Clemson do not check those boxes. The Big 12 will take FSU and Clemson, but how much of an upgrade is that?
Since it was public knowledge that the agreement was signed, wouldn't there be an applicable statute of limitations on challenging it?
Isn't that the point of a GOR?The GOR certainly seems punative. As does the large buyout amount.
The GOR certainly seems punative. As does the large buyout amount.
I don’t disagree. I just mean, is there any evidence the SEC will take them?SEC. They have to. FSU just showed you can go undefeated in the ACC and still not a get a chance to play in a national championship. Why would any recruit go there if they can go 13-0 and still be left out of the playoffs? Clemson and FSU have the choice of staying in the ACC and drifting into irrelevance or leaving for the SEC and continuing to be football powerhouses. Once realignment settles this time around the SEC and Big 10 will be the only football conferences that matter. Big 12 will be a second rate football conference compared to those two and the ACC will become a mid major for football.
Duke, Wake, ND, SU, bcu, SMU, Stanford, CalIt would be so much better if there was football only conferences and all other sports regional conferences. Just separate football and don’t ruin it for everyone else.
Virginia and North Carolina as excellent recruiting grounds in football and it will also be a territorial thing. Going non-South with Texas and Oklahoma is a bit off brand culturally, but North Carolina and Virginia fit (and at this point, another Vandy - in Virginia - to put on the schedule will be a welcome relief).So it's no longer about football?
Virginia blows in football and UNC isn't much better.
only if theyre also willing to take NC St....the state legislature did some hamstringing so either both leave or neither can leaveI told you all last summer, UNC is shaping up to leave the ACC and will be first in line when the chips fall.
The SEC is the preferred league.
it is until it isnt. BIG must also care about markets or they wouldnt have added rutgers and maryland. having said that virginia and unc dont bring in big markets either. having said that unc is a big brand. having said that theyd also have to take NC St. having said that the goal posts are always moving.So it's no longer about football?
Virginia blows in football and UNC isn't much better.
only if theyre also willing to take NC St....the state legislature did some hamstringing so either both leave or neither can leave
Viewership.So it's no longer about football?
Virginia blows in football and UNC isn't much better.
This is why as a UConn fan, this conference realignment stuff has been so infuriating. They move the goal posts and change the narrative on why they are expanding every time. Markets, football, academics/ AAU status, viewership, club quidditch, you name it.So it's no longer about football?
Virginia blows in football and UNC isn't much better.
UVA viewership?Viewership.
Fair point, but that was also a different era before cord cutting and streaming. Neither MD or Rutgers would draw much interest if the decision were made today, certainly not at a full share IMO. And I'm not sure that UVA or UNC move the needle in terms of additive revenue that would offset a full share either. A partial share, sure - but how much more than what they get from the ACC currently?it is until it isnt. BIG must also care about markets or they wouldnt have added rutgers and maryland. having said that virginia and unc dont bring in big markets either. having said that unc is a big brand. having said that theyd also have to take NC St. having said that the goal posts are always moving.
If there is anything we know for fact about CR, at least up to this point, it's that basketball means absolutely zero. Kelvin level zero. Nothing. Maybe Yormark views it as something but he has yet to act on it. We'll see.I'm very curious to see what happens with Duke. Is their basketball a big enough brand to get them into the Big 10 or SEC? If it is, then what is Kansas doing sitting in the Big 12?
Virginia market. It's the school that many Virginians follow. State with a large population. Not as fanatical statewide as residents of North Carolina are to UNC.UVA viewership?