- Joined
- May 11, 2012
- Messages
- 137
- Reaction Score
- 54
If you don't like a coach for whatever reason you can conjure up anything to criticize. Had Geno started CP and subbed for her this person would have found a way to make that wrong. In a couple of earlier games CP was not playing good defense at all got caught..
Who really gives a tish what some blogger wrote? This duncette shows absolutely no evidence she knows anything about Auriemma's starter/bench strategies over the last 20 years.
Lol good observation, I peeped it also.From the blogger's own About Me: "I fell in love with the sport and became a rabid fan - particularly of this young coach named Pat Summitt - around the 1984 Olympics. I still follow the Lady Vols like a cult member...". Uh-huh. A cult member, by self-admittance. We can tell. Even the page background is orange. Nuff said about that... Now back to things that matter.
From Sue Favor's self-description:Wow, who was writing with a bias?
I wish I can like this 1,000 times, but you get the ideaThe orange fans went bonkers when Geno pulled Candace as a starter for Maya. But here's my observation.
Parker was not playing the way the TEAM needed her to play. She fancies herself a 3, which is fine for the WNBA or any other pro team she's on, but the coaches were pretty clear, especially with Fowles injured early on, that it was ESSENTIAL for Parker to play in the post. She didn't want to, and additionally, her defense was like swiss cheese. Not only poor effort, but lack of intensity.
Regardless of what team you are a fan of, this was TEAM USA. Not team UCONN or team Tennessee or team LSU. It was the coaches job to bring home the gold medal. And they did exactly that. Orange fans are probably still crying about Parker's role. they will point to her 21 point performance in the finals as proof. Well, she played nothing like what Team USA wanted in the finals. She insisted on bringing the ball up the court, played a bunch of 1 on 1, even tho she belonged in the post, and even took some deep outside shots. Frankly I'm surprised Geno didn't bench her for the entire 2nd half. She scored 21 points because the game became all about Candace Parker for her, not Team USA.
But as several posters said, haters will hate, orange fans will scream and yell that Geno was a lousy coach and treated Parker like crap, but the bottom line is she was not doing what was asked/needed of her. Anyone who sees it differently is simply a hater and has orange blinders on. I would have said the same thing if Geno had put in Augustus or McCaughtry in place of Parker.
And BTW, it's pretty much universally acknowledged by everyone who doesn't wear orange blinders that DT is the best in the world. She was the "heart and soul" of Team USA. DT is, as Tina Turner said, Simply The Best...
The orange fans went bonkers when Geno pulled Candace as a starter for Maya. But here's my observation.
Parker was not playing the way the TEAM needed her to play. She fancies herself a 3, which is fine for the WNBA or any other pro team she's on, but the coaches were pretty clear, especially with Fowles injured early on, that it was ESSENTIAL for Parker to play in the post. She didn't want to, and additionally, her defense was like swiss cheese. Not only poor effort, but lack of intensity.
Another great observationHere's the line that told me the author is not very knowledgeable and has certainly never coached:
"No rhythm and flow in blowouts?"
That's right. You can win against a bad team while executing poorly. A good coach will be looking to see how his/her team is playing, not the score. They use those games to see whether the team is prepared and executing well enough to win against better competition later in the tournament. That concept sailed right over her head.
Funny you said that. I tweeted the exact thing on yesterday and took a Twitter beating from the Vol Fans....and ppl who weren't Vol fans but hated GenoI didn't say it yesterday because the game was won and it served no purpose but given this thread I will say that I thought that CP3 played selfish yesterday. She is a great athlete with awesome skills but but does not play well within a team concept. I thought that when she was at TN and still saw that characteristic in her game in London. Her full court rushes full court demonstrate both her gifts and her liabilities. Sure she was impressive doing it but a passed ball is much quicker and usually more effective. Against Australia she left it to others to do the tough defensive work without even making an effort. It is one thing to get beat by a bigger and stronger player, but it is another thing to not make any effort.
Wow! So much for supporting the players that worked hard to bring gold to the US. So according to you Candace is selfish, has no heart, and doesn't work hard? When she has a bad game you criticize her and when she has a good game you do so again. She really can't win with you. Against Austrailia no one in the first half could guard Cambage. Candace was not the one that even guarded her the most. In the second half everyone did better defensively on her especially Charles. At least i can admit what an amazing job Charles did in the second half. Do you know Geno's instructions to Candace in the gold medal game? Did he tell her to never lead the fastbreak and get an easy basket if she was able? She had several baskets because of offensive rebounds and put backs. Was she supposed to pass the ball out and ignore the easy layup? She took maybe two long jump shots and missed but the rest of her points came from around the basket and my guess is that was Geno's plan. Candace has always put in the work on the court and if you don't think she has heart then you missed her playing with a dislocated shoulder to help her team. Huge props to those on this board that supported the entire team including Candace.I didn't say it yesterday because the game was won and it served no purpose but given this thread I will say that I thought that CP3 played selfish yesterday. She is a great athlete with awesome skills but but does not play well within a team concept. I thought that when she was at TN and still saw that characteristic in her game in London. Her full court rushes full court demonstrate both her gifts and her liabilities. Sure she was impressive doing it but a passed ball is much quicker and usually more effective. Against Australia she left it to others to do the tough defensive work without even making an effort. It is one thing to get beat by a bigger and stronger player, but it is another thing to not make any effort.
I don't agree at all. She had two plays where she took it one on one for a basket. The rest were set plays where someone had a great pass to her for the score or where she got an offensive rebound and putback. She did a lot of passing and had a great assist to DT for a layup.Candace is a great player, but like Icebear said she is also a very selfish player. Yesterday Candace's one on one play sparked team USA on a run that led to an easy victory, but it also could have cost team USA a victory against a stronger team such as Australia.
And to those on your home board who supported the entire team, including Ashja and Swin -- and Geno. Just name them for me, and I'll see they get their awards.Huge props to those on this board that supported the entire team including Candace.
Every player had their ups and downs this tournament. IMO singling one player out as having no heart, putting in no effort, and playing selfish is going too far. Each player on the team worked very hard to get the gold and I don't see a reason to trash any player. It's fine if you don't agree with me. DT and Candace play very well together and have good chemistry. It will be interesting to watch them play together overseas with Sue. I saw a cute picture of DT, Candace, and Lailaa after the game. I'm glad the players respect each other and get along even if the fans don't.And to those on your home board who supported the entire team, including Ashja and Swin -- and Geno. Just name them for me, and I'll see they get their awards.
The "debate" over Candace's role didn't start here. It started in orange places and her hometown paper. If someone says Geno didn't use Candace properly because of his UConn bias, it's legitimate for folks here to state their opinions that his reasons were good. And to counter the accusation that he ignored her great play, it's also OK to offer an opinion, based on specific observation, that in the tournament as a whole she had her ups and downs.
I personally enjoyed watching the things she did in the final game. I enjoyed, BTW, seeing some great feeds to her from, among others, DT.