Is it really anything other than, "Perform on the terms of the contract, or breach and pay damages"?
Wouldn't, then, the party that suffers from the breach be obligated to file suit and allege damages?
And wouldn't the parties more likely than not negotiate a settlement prior to going to trial?
Everything else here is moral posturing that plays off the bad optics.
Harry Gampel's $1 million dollar contribution definitely seems like a great deal.
My father and his fellow members of a men's monthly dining club - that was comprised of guys who grew up in Hartford's largely Jewish North End during the Depression, and predominantly lived post-World War 2 in West Hartford - certainly thought so at the time.