UConnSwag11
Storrs, CT The Mecca
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 14,394
- Reaction Score
- 57,379
Zach needs to commit to UConn asap, give us some tweets, or we need new positive info bc this thread is so gross now.
The pinned thread at the top of this forum avoids all this. Props once again (can never say it enough times) to @tcf15 for all his work. These recruiting threads are a dumping ground. It serves it's own purpose. Check out the Durham and Alterique threads and compare them to the Stone thread for instance.Zach needs to commit to UConn asap, give us some tweets, or we need new positive info bc this thread is so gross now.
Now this is a rational thought.You have to love internet bulletin boards. So we ignore every rumor on the internet that UConn's rise was due to cheating, but we accept every rumor on the internet that any other successful program cheats. Why? Because some anonymous sources are better than other anonymous sources?
I presume that programs cheat. But none of you have any idea how much particular programs cheat compared to other programs. Except for the rare instances in which one gets caught. And if you measure it that way, we are not the worst but we are worse than many.
Isn't that what makes us fan(atic)s. Everyone but us cheats, a recruits only chance of improving is to come here and those that choose another school don't really care to win a championship. What am I forgettingYou have to love internet bulletin boards. So we ignore every rumor on the internet that UConn's rise was due to cheating, but we accept every rumor on the internet that any other successful program cheats. Why? Because some anonymous sources are better than other anonymous sources?
I presume that programs cheat. But none of you have any idea how much particular programs cheat compared to other programs. Except for the rare instances in which one gets caught. And if you measure it that way, we are not the worst but we are worse than many.
That pretty much sums up the facts of the matter very well...Isn't that what makes us fan(atic)s. Everyone but us cheats, a recruits only chance of improving is to come here and those that choose another school don't really care to win a championship. What am I forgetting
Isn't that what makes us fan(atic)s. Everyone but us cheats, a recruits only chance of improving is to come here and those that choose another school don't really care to win a championship. What am I forgetting
To your first point, one way to look at top level sports programs is that they, like any other student in a major like business for example, want to get their students employed. Players came to UConn under Calhoun to major in basketball and hopefully earn a career in the pros, and in that regard UConn has been like an Ivy League program for the last 25 years.I accept that UConn (speaking mostly about Calhoun) was right on the line of what was allowable for 20 years. And, I would state strongly that we did not tighten our academic hold on "student-athletes" as well as some Universities (THOUGH ... this is widely practiced). I do think the William Rhoden/Harvey Araton columns about graduation are misplaced. We have Ray Allen & others that made millions of dollars (even to the Stanley Robinson or Khalid El-Amin level in foreign work) ... push these kids to get a degree; however, they identified the means to advance themselves in a primary way: basketball prowess. Keep the focus on degree. I do not think there is anything amiss with a young man taking a high-paying gig at that age. UConn, though, should continuously push for them to want to finish.
Then ... did some kids flatline and just not to give effort at the end of their careers? I think Calhoun has a good record of keeping dozens of kids in touch with him and the fraternity. They want to be part of all things UConn Men's Hoop. You are going to get a kid or more who just does not keep with the group.
Nochimsen? I don't believe the UConn staff was what was portrayed. Nate Miles is what he is. He was high-maintenance and, maybe, Calhoun should have just peeled off. But, he did have success with Caron Butler and others; he liked playing Father Flanagan. I don't believe Nochimsen's actions were directed by UConn Basketball. I don't believe Nochimsen was your "typical" booster ... that we read about. Not a wannabe like the guy at the U. He was using athletes to advance himself; outside of the UConn Program. We are tainted because of his origins.
The Baltimore AAU with Gay; the wins on other kids? Part and parcel of NCAA HOOP in the last 25 years.
If a Rutgers fan or some others say something? You wish you had a Calhoun ... or a Dean Smith ... or a John Calipari ... or some other guy (like the UNLVcoach) who can figure out the current rules & be entrepreneurial in getting kids.
Paesano said:Go back to something you can handle like being Calipari's mancrush.
Third grade!Isn't that what makes us fan(atic)s. Everyone but us cheats, a recruits only chance of improving is to come here and those that choose another school don't really care to win a championship. What am I forgetting
Can you and would you be willing to elaborate?Of course the worse cheating is often never detected.
I have no regrets, Calhoun did what he needed to do to level the playing field. Whatever advantage we achieved in certain instances was standard operating procedure in the SEC football.
One article mentions his legal guardian liking KO and UCONN's ability to develop bigs like Drummond. Heaping praise on KO.
I'm not real comfortable with the double standard eitherSo to be clear, we have to claim AD now as someone we developed, even though he didn't really do all that much developing here. So if we claim him, we have to stop with the Calipari/Coach K do not develop players argument that permeates this board and leads some to make the asinine assertion that they are not good coaches. We were merely a pit stop for AD just as Kentucky and Duke are now for other one and done guys who would have gone straight to the pros were it allowed. If we reap the benefits (as it seems we are), then Cal "developed" Anthony Davis, Boogie Cousins, et al
Or he has come back year after year and has worked out with the coaches. All we know is what we've seen which was that one yearSo to be clear, we have to claim AD now as someone we developed, even though he didn't really do all that much developing here. So if we claim him, we have to stop with the Calipari/Coach K do not develop players argument that permeates this board and leads some to make the asinine assertion that they are not good coaches. We were merely a pit stop for AD just as Kentucky and Duke are now for other one and done guys who would have gone straight to the pros were it allowed. If we reap the benefits (as it seems we are), then Cal "developed" Anthony Davis, Boogie Cousins, et al
Can you and would you be willing to elaborate?
Can you and would you be willing to elaborate?
So to be clear, we have to claim AD now as someone we developed, even though he didn't really do all that much developing here. So if we claim him, we have to stop with the Calipari/Coach K do not develop players argument that permeates this board and leads some to make the asinine assertion that they are not good coaches. We were merely a pit stop for AD just as Kentucky and Duke are now for other one and done guys who would have gone straight to the pros were it allowed. If we reap the benefits (as it seems we are), then Cal "developed" Anthony Davis, Boogie Cousins, et al
I still wouldn't mind hearing what he has to say. I'm confident in my ability to detect b.s. if it's not b.s. i still want to hear it.No, why don't we not go there, wherever that might be in the mind of Chief.
I still wouldn't mind hearing what he has to say. I'm confident in my ability to detect b.s. if it's not b.s. i still want to hear it.
AD's stint at UCONN was 2 steps on the ladder to where he is now, so KO gets no credit for that? The NBA is 24/7 for training unlike college so lets be real as to what can be done with the time alloted, but our time at his young age was critical and KO is values guy building character.So to be clear, we have to claim AD now as someone we developed, even though he didn't really do all that much developing here. So if we claim him, we have to stop with the Calipari/Coach K do not develop players argument that permeates this board and leads some to make the asinine assertion that they are not good coaches. We were merely a pit stop for AD just as Kentucky and Duke are now for other one and done guys who would have gone straight to the pros were it allowed. If we reap the benefits (as it seems we are), then Cal "developed" Anthony Davis, Boogie Cousins, et al
I don't necessarily disagree with your overall point, but that's an odd tangent to go off on when Brown's guardian is the one who made the comments about Drummond.
Can you and would you be willing to elaborate?