And you know this because….Flores said so?You're supposed to interview candidates before you make a hire not after. Flores didn't get an interview for a job, they wasted his time.
And you know this because….Flores said so?You're supposed to interview candidates before you make a hire not after. Flores didn't get an interview for a job, they wasted his time.
The Rooney rule is well-intentioned but it doesn't address the main problem.Not a fan of the Rooney rule. You shouldn't be forced to interview or not interview someone based on how they look. It should be done by merit. These are billion dollar organizations and it's 2022: you are not going to hire the #2 candidate just because the top candidate is black. It just so happens that only one coach is black. This time next year, four coaches could be black. The winds change based on who gets fired. They don't draft players based on skin color so it would make no sense for the owners to hire coaches based on skin color. The NBA btw has 12 black coaches. (I don't hear anyone complaining about underrepresentation of Latino or white coaches in the NBA- the black coaches are in those positions by merit not how they look).
Rooney rule is an nfl rule. It’s not a legal requirement. They interviewed graham and Frazier. Didn’t u ever interview someone and say that’s my guy. Even telling the candidate we want you but continue to interview to see if someone knocks your socks off? Flores is mad he didn’t get a job so he’s suing. Not a guy I want on my payroll. Rehab your image from being a bad manager and try again. So Rooney rule was ok when he got job in Miami?This is a class action suit. Expect more plaintiffs, and if it gets as far as the discovery phase, it's going to get wild. We all know the Rooney Rule is a sham. But is it a bad faith one? If so, then you have potential civil rights issues to tackle.
Stephen Ross however, is in a whole lot of trouble if he bought into a gambling venture and there is proof he bribed Flores to tank games to the tune of $100k per game.
Nepotism doesn't necessarily mean racism. That's a different issue.The Rooney rule is well-intentioned but it doesn't address the main problem.
The NFL is a cesspool of nepotism. There's a reason lousy coaches get opportunity after opportunity. It's all about who you know. This starts from the very beginning with low-level hires. If you want to fix the inequality in GMs and Head Coaches, you start at the bottom so relationships can be formed.
No, it doesn't mean racism, but it is the main issue. If the coaches are overwhelmingly white, the majority of front offices are white, and the owners are all white, and they hire their white relatives and friends/friends kids for entry level positions, it's taking positions away from qualified minority candidates.Nepotism doesn't necessarily mean racism. That's a different issue.
Nothing you’ve said here is relevant at all to what is transpiring.Rooney rule is an nfl rule. It’s not a legal requirement. They interviewed graham and Frazier. Didn’t u ever interview someone and say that’s my guy. Even telling the candidate we want you but continue to interview to see if someone knocks your socks off? Flores is mad he didn’t get a job so he’s suing. Not a guy I want on my payroll. Rehab your image from being a bad manager and try again. So Rooney rule was ok when he got job in Miami?
Have you seen Jerry Reese the former GM?No, it doesn't mean racism, but it is the main issue. If the coaches are overwhelmingly white, the majority of front offices are white, and the owners are all white, and they hire their white relatives and friends/friends kids for entry level positions, it's taking positions away from qualified minority candidates.
Tell me what the Rooney Rule has actually accomplished? Some African American coaches were given an interview at a job they weren't getting anyway because they owners didn't want to get in trouble? Feels like there's a better solution for the issue out there.No, it doesn't mean racism, but it is the main issue. If the coaches are overwhelmingly white, the majority of front offices are white, and the owners are all white, and they hire their white relatives and friends/friends kids for entry level positions, it's taking positions away from qualified minority candidates.
The Rooney rule hasn't accomplished anything. Like I said, it's all about connections and if they want to increase the number of minority coaches then they need to be given more opportunities at the ground level so they can form those connections.Tell me what the Rooney Rule has actually accomplished? Some African American coaches were given an interview at a job they weren't getting anyway because they owners didn't want to get in trouble? Feels like there's a better solution for the issue out there.
The Giants have never had a black coach.What am I missing?
Neither has a lot of teams. They had a black GM for over a decade. If they hire Pep Hamilton they will have 3 black coordinators.The Giants have never had a black coach.
What other teams have never had a black coach? Not head coach, coach.Neither has a lot of teams.
I'm confused now, I thought you were saying head coach but are you suggesting the Giants have never had a black coach?What other teams have never had a black coach? Not head coach, coach.
I just told you the Giants have black coaches. They have a black DC and STC currently. What are you talking about???What other teams have never had a black coach? Not head coach, coach.
They’ve always had a ton of black non head coaches and their GM prior to Gettleman was black. They have no problem putting African Americans in positions of power.The Giants have never had a black coach.
Not surprising the guy who throws out, without pointing to anything specific, that there is a lot racism in this thread also has literally no idea what he is talking about on the subject at hand.They’ve always had a ton of black non head coaches and their GM prior to Gettleman was black. They have no problem putting African Americans in positions of power.
Could be true on this one as I was repeating something I heard on TV. I should have put in the question mark. And do I have to point out the casual racism? It's so obvious. I hesitate because these days there is more pushback to pointing out racism than being racist.Not surprising the guy who throws out, without pointing to anything specific, that there is a lot racism in this thread also has literally no idea what he is talking about on the subject at hand.
So you admit you were insinuating the Giants are racist based on something you heard on TV, despite responding to a comment that directly contradicted it. Maybe there is pushback because situations like where it is just thrown around by people who have zero idea about what they are talking about on the subject?Could be true on this one as I was repeating something I heard on TV. I should have put in the question mark. And do I have to point out the casual racism? It's so obvious. I hesitate because these days there is more pushback to pointing out racism than being racist.