Why is it important to anyone whether maryland leaves? Seriously, folks, it's Maryland. The fact that the Big Ten thinks they make more money selling the BTN in greater DC is a Big Ten issue, but what does the ACC lose?
Further, is UConn really that much of a downgrade from them football-wise?
2002: UM - 11-3; UConn - 6-6
2003: UM - 10-3; UConn - 9-3
2004: UM - 5-6; UConn - 8-4
2005: UM - 5-6; UConn - 5-6
2006: UM - 9-4; UConn - 4-8
2007: UM - 6-7; UConn - 9-4
2008: UM - 8-5; UConn - 8-5
2009: UM - 2-10; UConn - 8-5
2010: UM - 9-4; UConn - 8-5
2011: UM - 2-10; UConn - 5-7
2012: UM - 4-7; UConn - 4-6
Overall: UM - 71-64; UConn 74-59
Since UConn has been FBS, they have more wins and fewer losses than Maryland. This despite having no history and not having the ability to recruit on a level playing field in those early years. While Maryland's best two season are better than UConn's, they have 6 losing seasons (two at 2-10) compared to 3 (likely 4).