its absolutely revisionist history to say kemba was much better than boat as a sophomore. aside from an extra rebound, their stats could not be more similar. i never once questioned kembas heart or toughness in three years, but he was NOT a great decision maker in 2010. i distinctly remember a moment 5 minutes into the Texas game, Kemba committed his fifth turnover and you could hear and feel the disgust throughout Gampel.
Kemba '10 35.2mpg, 14.6 ppg, 5.1apg, 2.9 topg, 2.1spg
Boat '10 36.3mpg, 15.4 ppg, 4.4apg 3.0 topg, 1.5spg
Kemba '10 .403/.339/.767 on 11.1/3.3/5.9 attempts
Boat '10 .429/.333/.785 on 11.7/4.3/5.0 attempts
Kemba '10 20.2 PER/.525 TS%/23.4 usg%/17.3 TOV%
Boat '10 18.6 PER/.546 TS%/25.4 usg%/17.4 TOV%
stats can lie, but they can't lie that much. they both had plenty of great moments mixed with plenty of head-scratchers. you can say your eye always told you that Kemba had 'IT' and argue that the upperclassmen in '10 held him back, but the fact remains that he was the point guard of a team with plenty of talent that didnt even make the NCAA tournament.
having said all of that, Kemba is my alltime favorite Husky and I would be happy if Boat showed 1/4 of the improvement that Kemba made from his sophomore to junior year. and I agree that Kemba was more enjoyable to watch than Boat as a sophomore, but I dont see any evidence that he was a better player.
i will also edit to add that kemba was almost certainly a better defender, but
1)its really hard to evaluate individual defense because there is so much noise
2)pg defense is less important than any other position on the court
3)kemba had the luxury of dyson next to him to help take the pressure off of matchups against bigger guards
still, i would concede that boats defense is very poor and if you argue that the gap in D between kemba and boat is what separates them as sophomores, it would be hard to argue