+2+ 1
Agree that Tulsa is better than Memphis. But no more all sports teams should be considered unless we go all sports for the western division and split off from BB schools.Greg Swaim has plan for 14. Here is his plan:
http://gregswaim.com/2011/11/the-proactive-approach-to-big-east-expansion/
Excellent points. The BE executives who did the best they could do with the hand they were dealt and they deserve a lot of credit from their critics. I still think Uconn will be going to the ACC with either ND or Rutgers but we'll see. Good move not taking Temple, ECU (could never figure that one out), or the others you mentioned. Just got power back and have been in the dark (literally) but this is good news.This is good news. The Big East took lemons and made something as close to lemonaid as they could:
1. They did not lose the markets and basketball ability of the Catholics by rushing off separately;
2. They did not go after new schools based at all upon basketball (see, e.g., Temple, Memphis and UMass) but rebuilt the football conference the best they could and let the basketball conference fall where it may, knowing that the Big East in basketball would still be a "major" conference; and
3. They did this paying attention to both markets (UCF, SMU and Houston) and national prestige (Navy and AFA), instead of geography (ECU, Marshall, UMass and Temple).
This is not the leagie I would prefer to be in at hte moment, but for an entity that was dead in the water it's a great recovery in five weeks. If they get a good contract, I could see adding western basketball onlies (Gonzaga? Witchita State?) and all sports (San Diego State?) and one day having two relatively separate eastern and western leagues that only came together for playoffs.
Two Huskies already have season tix!Reno would be cool. Huskies will travel to Nevada. Getting in and out is easy
I love the idea of going to 14 and I want 13 and 14 to be western, football only schools. I also think re-branding the football conference with a new name might be in order. The "Big East" brand for football is forever tarnished and mocked, a new name that brands us as a national football conference should be considered.
I don't know if the ACC is in UConn's cards. But treating this NBE arrangement with disgust is not only arrogant, but it is inaccurate and detrimental to making the best of a situation
I understand that this is a pretty decent development after how bleak things looked a few weeks ago.
Still, I don't feel disgust towards this new league. It's more like a special level of apathy. College sports are about history and rivalry - and it's hard to get too excited about a league that can't possibly last for the medium term, nevermind the long haul.
Is Navy or UCF out? Kustra talked about a 6 team western division that did not include Louisville and Cincinnati. The only way that is possible is if the East is also 6. UConn, Rutgers, USF, Louisville and Cincinnati make 5. UCF has all but said they have an invite, so it is probably not them.
I think Navy is making the right move by staying independent, but it is an interesting development.
I prefer to believe UConn is making a great business arrangement with these "football partners" in that UConn is protecting it's football investment. And I believe UConn will not be prevented by this arrangement in seeking the collaboration with equivalent universities on the academic side if it wants to.
I don't know if the ACC is in UConn's cards. But treating this NBE arrangement with disgust is not only arrogant, but it is inaccurate and detrimental to making the best of a situation
Not certain of this entirely. But there are worse alternatives than this attempt.It is making the best of a bad situation, but the best of a bad situation is still a bad situation.