- Joined
- Aug 31, 2011
- Messages
- 700
- Reaction Score
- 996
he also got to coach the US national team, helping recruiting etc. no way that happens if his program had been chided like this
he also got to coach the US national team, helping recruiting etc. no way that happens if his program had been chided like this
he also got to coach the US national team, helping recruiting etc. no way that happens if his program had been chided like this
I certainly want him to go away.I have good friends who are life-long Syracuse fans - I know some will turn themselves inside out defending him, but more simply want him to go away.
Don't think they're cut from the same cloth at all.Boeheim is an . But he's cut from the same cloth as Jimmy C (in attitude, not...moral standards or whatever).
Wouldn't have expected anything different from his response.
The sanctions don't matter. They're harsh enough, deep down we knew there would be no additional tournament bans. But even if there were Syracuse is safe in a strong conference.
Just glad that this ensures he'll never reach 1,000 official wins.
One of the lessons here is that if you stay long enough, your sins will eventually come back to bite you.
JoePa said:You're tellin' me!
It is quite amazing that some people actually think this is a harsh punishment. They clearly violated rules during their championship season, yet managed to negotiate that year out of the applicable penalty period. And shockingly, their cheating stopped right before their Final Four in 2013. As you said, no one on their current team will leave because of these sanctions, and the sanctions won't prevent any member of next years very good recruiting class from showing up. If they put up a 5-6 loss season next year, win a couple games in the tourney, and put McCullough in the top 20 of the draft, they will keep rolling right along. No high level team needs all their scholarships to be successful. The only thing that's a real punishment is being able to send out only 2 people to recruit, and even that can be managed. And that's assuming none of these sanctions get walked back 2 years from now.Don't care about the 9 suspended ACC games next year nor do I care about the 108 wins they take away from his now pitiful legacy. The loss of 12 scholarships in 4 years may burden them so that's good, but they get to keep intact the class they have coming in and play in the tourney NEXT year after these findings we made at this point of THIS year? Not happy with that - they should have said a while ago these kids can go this year of they make it and no for next year. Then they would be "penalized" as they should be, but watching kids jump off the ship!
He's a and he gets to coach a real good team again next year so there's something wrong with that!
Even if they stick with the scholarship reductions, it's not like they can't be successful. We just won multiple national championships while on scholarship reduction.Exactly. The NCAA opened up our barn doors and let all the animals out to go to different farms.
They keep every player and top recruit. The only casualty is Christmas misses this year's ACC tournament.
The NCAA will roll most of those scholarship penalties back. Cuse got off easy unless I'm wrong and the NCAA sticks with the scholly penalties. I just have no faith in the NCAA.
Don't think they're cut from the same cloth at all.
JB's nose and his nose picking says it all. He's an arrogant self centered individual. I get the impression JB is at best aloof from his players and at worst has a disdain for his players, believing they are pawns for his goal, adulation. JC doesn't shy away from being in the spot light but it's a shared spotlight. He genuinely cares about his players and the program even as he's sometimes flawed with his execution in showing it. With JB the spotlight is primarily on himself.
Both dislike talking to the media. JB because the media is beneath him. JC because the media doesn't always play the game fairly. He's a warrior and hates that the media has all the players and refs on it's side regarding the public forum. And like Billy Budd he over reacts when shoved into a corner. Neither endeared themselves to the media. It bothered JC. JB could care less.
In the long run this might turn out to be the best thing that could happen for Syracuse. JC wanted the bb program to succeed long after he retired. He feels the program is bigger than himself, which is why you see him taking a hands off approach to KO. JB believes he is the program and would love to see it fail after he retires. Like so many flawed legacies, he would try to sabotage future Syracuse coaches. Think St. Johns and Lou Carnesecca. Having him marginalized reduces this somewhat. But like his speech he won't go down fighting.
It is quite amazing that some people actually think this is a harsh punishment. They clearly violated rules during their championship season, yet managed to negotiate that year out of the applicable penalty period. And shockingly, their cheating stopped right before their Final Four in 2013. As you said, no one on their current team will leave because of these sanctions, and the sanctions won't prevent any member of next years very good recruiting class from showing up. If they put up a 5-6 loss season next year, win a couple games in the tourney, and put McCullough in the top 20 of the draft, they will keep rolling right along. No high level team needs all their scholarships to be successful. The only thing that's a real punishment is being able to send out only 2 people to recruit, and even that can be managed. And that's assuming none of these sanctions get walked back 2 years from now.
A tourney ban would have been 100x worse. Their top upperclassmen could have left, their high level recruits could have gone elsewhere. They would have to rely on their current freshman and sophomore classes which are weak. That thing would have been a disaster and left a real impression.
If you read some of the other articles, it specifically states that Syracuse negotiated with the NCAA to make the period of time during which violations occurred start after 2003. How the duckk is the period of time you were cheating something that can be negotiated? It's unreal, but standard NCAA.The NCAA brilliantly kept alive its streak of never stripping a college basketball team of its national title.
The vacation of games levied against Syracuse skipped right over 2003, the year Carmelo Anthony led the Orange to the NCAA title.
Whew ... what a fortunate hop-scotch of justice. Or, actually, this is the way it always works.
— Chris Dufresne, Los Angeles Times
It is hard for most coaches in any program to be successful or sustain success. It is harder for a coach following a legacy to live up to the expectations of a fan base that insists on the same standard. It is next to impossible when the succeeding coach must deal with a legacy coach who at some level of consciousness needs to maintain the spotlight.Your last paragraph bring up an interesting point. G'town, Villanova and SJU all had larger than life coaches and all of them have regressed significantly since JT, Rollie and Louie left. SU could follow suit after JB leaves. Nova is close to being a national story but it's 30 years since their magical run.
UConn was a late bloomer in the BE, but by the time the conference split up UConn and JC had the most accomplishments in terms of National Championships and BE titles. There isn't any guarantee that Ollie will end up with accomplishments as vast as Calhoun but UConn has won a championship with JC's successor and that's something none of the other BE schools have done.
When UConn got dinged the words I still remember from JC's statement were "mistakes were made". Also Calhoun, I don't ever remember, him knocking a player who was considering leaving early for the NBA. The only thing they had in common they were coaches and ornery.Boeheim is an . But he's cut from the same cloth as Jimmy C (in attitude, not...moral standards or whatever).
Wouldn't have expected anything different from his response.
The sanctions don't matter. They're harsh enough, deep down we knew there would be no additional tournament bans. But even if there were Syracuse is safe in a strong conference.
Just glad that this ensures he'll never reach 1,000 official wins.
It is hard for most coaches in any program to be successful or sustain success. It is harder for a coach following a legacy to live up to the expectations of a fan base that insists on the same standard. It is next to impossible when the succeeding coach must deal with a legacy coach who at some level of consciousness needs to maintain the spotlight.
It is not unusual for people to sabotage others to make themselves successful. You would think a legacy wouldn't need that, but then again what drives some uber rich people to make more money at the expense of others who are just struggling to survive. Neediness comes in many forms. We understand this in people who are struggling in life such as drug users. It is much harder to understand in those who are successful, powerful and/or wealthy.
In the case I'm postulating the legacy coaches struggl to share success with anyone. But the coaches that follow, in the minds of these individuals, would reduce the value of their legacy if they were to succeed. As an aside, I think Calipari would have no problem with the next coach being successful. It's not that he cares about Kentucky or the next coach, it's just that he is so enamored with himself he would put no thought into what happens at Kentucky after he left. That's how he left UMass and Memphis.
Maybe this a last ditch effort by the nose picker to match UConn's accomplishments. "If UConn can win it all with a reduction in scholllies than so can I"-Jim "the picker" BoeheimEven if they stick with the scholarship reductions, it's not like they can't be successful. We just won multiple national championships while on scholarship reduction.
I want to know how the school negotiated this punishment, which dragged the process out, then complained about how long it took. And immediately announces Boeheim will be appealing his punishment. They look like assclowns, but I guess that's nothing new.If you read some of the other articles, it specifically states that Syracuse negotiated with the NCAA to make the period of time during which violations occurred start after 2003. How the duckk is the period of time you were cheating something that can be negotiated? It's unreal, but standard NCAA.
The fact he would pick his nose on national television should have said all that needed to be known when it comes to how much he thinks of others. The only thing he didn't do (at least on television) was flick the boogers onto the courts.I never thought he was a bad guy even if I had my doubts watching him interact with the media at times.
I may be totally off base here, but it seems like the cheating and general slimy nature of the Syracuse program coincided with the UConn's championships. Boeheim was desperate to keep up w/ Calhoun and has ended up tied w/ Ollie and 1 behind Olander, while dragging the program and school through the mud. A bogus APR blemish vs. a decade of cheating. Calhoun and UConn win again
Many N.C. State fans stopped their "Wolf! Pack!" chant during Syracuse's starting lineups long enough to strongly boo Boeheim when he was introduced.
Then others sang the chorus from the Village People's song "YMCA" during Syracuse's early possessions.