- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 13,460
- Reaction Score
- 35,976
It's the injury to Jaylen Clark and Adem Bona, I'd guess.Surprised no love for UCLA.
It's the injury to Jaylen Clark and Adem Bona, I'd guess.Surprised no love for UCLA.
As much as the boys need to win some games, Hurley needs it more. The albatross is around his neck. My biggest worry is those vibes are felt by the players and can fuel panic. Making it out of the first weekend successfully Should do wonders for them.To be fair, they don't watch the games. The team hasn't been great in one possession games, and the team under Hurley is 0-2 in the NCAA as the higher seed. Now, I don't think a 10 beating a 7 is an upset (though 7s win 60% of the time), but losing as a 5 last year hurt. The team didn't look great in either of those games, either. 1 game is somewhat meaningless, 2 games can be variance, but it might be a trend.
I think the board is way too down on the team after the loss to Marquette by 2, but I get the skepticism given the team has never won any thing in the post-season.
Has Hurley? Yes, at URI he won an A10 tournament and won NCAA tournament games his last two years here—2017 as an 11 over a 6 (and almost beat 3 Oregon the next round), and then as a 7 (over Trae Young's 10 Oklahoma).
The team just needs the monkey off their back. I think they're very good, but I don't think they will likely win a title because (a) that's unlikely no matter the team, and (b) they haven't proven the ability to remain consistent in a close game under 5 minutes left.
BUT: if the refs call the games like they did pre-BE, and Jordan Hawkins finds his stroke, I'm very happy to be wrong.
Not always.Bilas has always been more than fair to us. Seems like a lot of love from the ESPN crew.
I am not a Hurley hater, far from it in fact. He's done a phenomenal job rebuilding the dumpster fire that was left by Ollie, but we are now in year 5 of the Hurley era and the facts are these:I think most of you that "are skeptical" about this team are as far from realistic as one can be.
It's like you have no idea what highest level of competition is. Success, growth and winning is really all about skill, perseverance and a little luck. You think it's simple, when it's all extremely hard. The best thing any fan can really hope for is the be in the conversation, and we are
What is realistic is to suggest it's hard to win the national championship. Only one team in the country can do that
We've already exceeded expectations in every way known to college basketball, yet you "realistic" fans (A/K/A Hurley Haters) somehow find failure in that.
I think many "realistic" fans are emotionally invested in seeing Hurley lose. All so damn bizarre to me.
Why are they a 2 seed if that's the case? I thought injuries were supposed to be factored in?It's the injury to Jaylen Clark and Adem Bona, I'd guess.
Please explain how UConn this season and under Dan Hurley has exceeded expectations in every way known to college basketball.I think most of you that "are skeptical" about this team are as far from realistic as one can be.
It's like you have no idea what highest level of competition is. Success, growth and winning is really all about skill, perseverance and a little luck. You think it's simple, when it's all extremely hard. The best thing any fan can really hope for is the be in the conversation, and we are
What is realistic is to suggest it's hard to win the national championship. Only one team in the country can do that
We've already exceeded expectations in every way known to college basketball, yet you "realistic" fans (A/K/A Hurley Haters) somehow find failure in that.
I think many "realistic" fans are emotionally invested in seeing Hurley lose. All so damn bizarre to me.
just off a bit, here, but didn't UC court Shaka Smart, during the last coaching search. For some reason, I thought his name had been mentioned.Every single national reporter that works for the espn must not know Han Durrrley can’t coach. Someone must warn them before they look like fools!
Our guards are significantly better than theirsAnd we do?
There were strong rumors that he would be the hire when Calhoun stepped down. It seems pretty clear Calhoun stepped down as late as he did to force Ollie into the position and hamstring an AD that was going to do a national search ending in Smart.just off a bit, here, but didn't UC court Shaka Smart, during the last coaching search. For some reason, I thought his name had been mentioned.
I really don't think Duke gets that far.He knows![]()
Bilas has changed it to Arizona over UConn
All fine and dandy but how is Iona going to handle our defense? I think the game will be competitive, but UCONN has too much.Bilas now has Arizona beating UConn in the title game. Stanford Steve wants nothing to do with UConn, thinks Iona's speed will expose UConn's lack of no true point guard.
77-74UConn over Duke!
Bilas now has Arizona beating UConn in the title game. Stanford Steve wants nothing to do with UConn, thinks Iona's speed will expose UConn's lack of no true point guard.

Are they still the conference of Champions when UCLA leaves?They are from the conference of champions
![]()
Never gets old.
A true PG is our weakness, and great PG play tends to fuel deep runs. We seem to do pretty good notwithstanding we don’t have a great penetrating guard, but it sure we be handy.
I could've sworn Bilas picked Zona over UConn an hour ago but he just picked UConn again over Duke to win it all. It's weird how everyone on ESPN has UConn in the final 4.Bilas now has Arizona beating UConn in the title game. Stanford Steve wants nothing to do with UConn, thinks Iona's speed will expose UConn's lack of no true point guard.
I think it's being prescient, not weird.I could've sworn Bilas picked Zona over UConn an hour ago but he just picked UConn again over Duke to win it all. It's weird how everyone on ESPN has UConn in the final 4.
His ESPN article had Zona over UConn when I read it a few hours ago. Still does:I could've sworn Bilas picked Zona over UConn an hour ago but he just picked UConn again over Duke to win it all. It's weird how everyone on ESPN has UConn in the final 4.
Its tough to pick a team that wasn’t top 3 regular season in conference or hasn’t reached the final in conf tournament
Meh, that generally doesn't have a direct correlation to NCAA tournament performance.Its tough to pick a team that wasn’t top 3 regular season in conference or hasn’t reached the final in conf tournament
Hedging his picks. Does he have a podcast where he picked Kansas?His ESPN article had Zona over UConn when I read it a few hours ago. Still does:
National championship
No No. 5 seed has ever won the national championship, or so Rece Davis told me on the Dirty Dog in between spine-rattling screams on the Screaming Baby Express from Greensboro to Bristol. I am going with Davis' wisdom ... or maybe it was the guitar-playing cowboy that told me that?! No matter, Arizona will win the Pac-12's first national championship since 1997, when Arizona won it under Lute Olson. Winner: Arizona.
Don't know why he's talking about a 5—rather than a 4-seed, which has won the title—but here it is.
Maybe we can do both- respected and win. Let’s do itI prefer to be disrespected and prove the doubters wrong. "This is what happens when you ban us."... The team doesn't seem to believe the hype too much and it shows on the court.
