optimistic. why would the ollie payment be factored in as opposed to any other expenses?I believe UConn is only that low because of the Ollie money
Ollie money is in the 2022 numbers for expenses. This is raw revenues taken from the sportico database:I believe UConn is only that low because of the Ollie money
It's that low because everyone is accounting for things differently.I believe UConn is only that low because of the Ollie money
two shockers above:
1) Lville still had highest revenue even though they won 8 games???
2) duke isnt' in the top 50??
I don’t think that list is including any private schools. This may just be public.two shockers above:
1) Lville still had highest revenue even though they won 8 games???
2) duke isnt' in the top 50??
Correct, Both Marquette and Creighton list over 14million in revenue and are not on that list. I believe both of their buildings are bigger than Gampel and XL.I don’t think that list is including any private schools. This may just be public.
We were taking in $12 million back in 2009 according to JC so I would think it would be much higher today.
The chart didn't include private institutionstwo shockers above:
1) Lville still had highest revenue even though they won 8 games???
2) duke isnt' in the top 50??
The chart didn't include private institutions
Lville has dedicated fans that attend games even if dumpster fire. Compare to UConn that has fair weather fans. Same is true in football where teams like Iowa State and KU when they were bad still had high attendance at football games.two shockers above:
1) Lville still had highest revenue even though they won 8 games???
2) duke isnt' in the top 50??
We were taking in $12 million back in 2009 according to JC so I would think it would be much higher today.
Schools do accounting differently and I think that graphic was mostly based on ticket sales, which is building dependent. These numbers are very difficult to compare.So I saw a graphic online comparing the revenue generated from MBB for all public schools in FY 2023 and UConn was only 10.63 million, right between Oregon and Washington. We were ranked 45th, how can this be especially with a natty?
We do well but not great in fund raising, nothing in media, home attendance was around 11500 which is good but not great. Not in the Top 50 for attendance.So I saw a graphic online comparing the revenue generated from MBB for all public schools in FY 2023 and UConn was only 10.63 million, right between Oregon and Washington. We were ranked 45th, how can this be especially with a natty?
But operating expenses were around $13M for MBB so is our back-to-back championships team really burning money?We do well but not great in fund raising, nothing in media, home attendance was around 11500 which is good but not great. Not in the Top 50 for attendance.
It's good considering we play half the games in an arena that hold 1K less than 11.5.We do well but not great in fund raising, nothing in media, home attendance was around 11500 which is good but not great.
The NC in what apparently is an incentive based system wouldn‘t be reflected until 2023-24 season and will be multiplied next year and with the second one success this year and it will rise againSo I saw a graphic online comparing the revenue generated from MBB for all public schools in FY 2023 and UConn was only 10.63 million, right between Oregon and Washington. We were ranked 45th, how can this be especially with a natty?
Yes but everyone wants to eliminate or reduce the XL games and though we might “sell out” those games, I doubt we do, the fannies in seats are mostly dictated by the opponent. Really at Gampel too. Not like the dayscwhen they’d sell out the Civic Center if the played five orange cones!It's good considering we play half the games in an arena that hold 1K less than 11.5.
I mean Cameron Indoor is smaller than Gampel and I bet Duke would be top 10 at least (only public schools were included). I'm not saying we have to be as high as Duke but we don't have any excuse to be bottom of the P5 in terms of revenue unless the school is accounting in a different manner. I also don't think conference media deals were includedYes but everyone wants to eliminate or reduce the XL games and though we might “sell out” those games, I doubt we do, the fannies in seats are mostly dictated by the opponent. Really at Gampel too. Not like the dayscwhen they’d sell out the Civic Center if the played five orange cones!
The other thing is that playing at Gampel is good in my mind but you need to accept that a 10,000 seat arena will limit your take. A good Louisville or Syracuse team will always outdraw a great UConn one.
It’s accounting.I mean Cameron Indoor is smaller than Gampel and I bet Duke would be top 10 at least (only public schools were included). I'm not saying we have to be as high as Duke but we don't have any excuse to be bottom of the P5 in terms of revenue unless the school is accounting in a different manner. I also don't think conference media deals were included
Interesting. I did not know that Duke had that decision to make in the mid 1980s.In the mid 1980s, Duke trustees evaluated a plan to build a 16,000 seat arena, and they turned it down. Why? Well, they preferred the ambiance of Cameron Indoor Stadium, AND it was a tacit admission that in a market where Duke is still only the third most popular school, selling 11 or 12,000 a game would be nice but at the cost of lots with empty seats (or seats bought up by Tar Heel and Wolfpack fans). It wasn't a good long term plan.
Think of it as the opposite of what has become of a home court advantage at Georgetown, with 12-15,000 empty seats a game.