- Joined
- Jan 6, 2015
- Messages
- 7,409
- Reaction Score
- 60,930
Solid pick up for Georgetown. I've caught Cook live a few times and he's a solid, smart and hard working center. He was kinda like the MAAC's version of Sanogo.
Solid pick up for Georgetown. I've caught Cook live a few times and he's a solid, smart and hard working center. He was kinda like the MAAC's version of Sanogo.
That's funny! I just mastered Hollandaise sauce!Dude also makes a mean souffle
Dude also makes a mean soufflenot
strictly a depth piece, will not be major contributor in big east. Fairfield was awfulDude also makes a mean souffle
Dunleavey hire helped them with NIL story..Burton to Villanova caps off their pretty insane transfer haul. They really hit the NIL ground hard in Neptune's 2nd season.
I like all of Bamba, Burton, Hart, and even Ware is a good swing.
Nova is going to be really old.Burton to Villanova caps off their pretty insane transfer haul. They really hit the NIL ground hard in Neptune's 2nd season.
I like all of Bamba, Burton, Hart, and even Ware is a good swing.
It definitely will ease some jitters that their fans had since February when they were already looking ahead to next season. Neptune used the transfer portal to compensate for the lackluster freshmen recruiting class. This is good for Nova and the Big East.Burton to Villanova caps off their pretty insane transfer haul. They really hit the NIL ground hard in Neptune's 2nd season.
I like all of Bamba, Burton, Hart, and even Ware is a good swing.
They will be really old. Which is why Neptune and his staff have to be better on the high school recruiting trail then they were this year. It's not sustainable to have the transfer portal compensate for lackluster freshmen classes year after year, IMO.Nova is going to be really old.
Moore is a 5th year, Burton is a 5th year. Hart is a 5th year. Dixon is a 5th year if you count RS year. Arcidiacano is a 5th year. Bamba is a 4th year. Ware is a 4th year. Longino is a 3rd year. Armstrong is 2nd year.
Nova is going to be really old.
Moore is a 5th year, Burton is a 5th year. Hart is a 5th year. Dixon is a 5th year if you count RS year. Arcidiacano is a 5th year. Bamba is a 4th year. Ware is a 4th year. Longino is a 3rd year. Armstrong is 2nd year.
They will be really old. Which is why Neptune and his staff have to be better on the high school recruiting trail then they were this year. It's not sustainable to have the transfer portal compensate for lackluster freshmen classes year after year, IMO.
certainly. Nova cannot miss the NCAAT. If they do Neptune's seat will be more than hot, it will be on fire.SDSU and FAU proved that experience is a good way to go for March success.
It dials up the pressure on Neptune. This is a really talented roster. No excuses.
Unless the NCAA suddenly decides to revoke the immediate eligibility rule it's 100% sustainable. There's always going to be kids looking play for one of the top teams in a top 3 basketball leagueThey will be really old. Which is why Neptune and his staff have to be better on the high school recruiting trail then they were this year. It's not sustainable to have the transfer portal compensate for lackluster freshmen classes year after year, IMO.
Especially since those 17 year olds get pissed when they aren't starting and they wind up in the transfer portal. Reminds me of NBA teams taking raw talent. When the kid is finally ready to really contribute, he's a free agent. Accept there is no salary cap on giving NIL to a transfer.I think it is sustainable. I think a lot of programs are going to focus more on the portal than on the high school circuit going forward. The success rate off the portal is going to be much higher than it is with 17 year olds.
It's interesting, both you and Nelsonmuntz said the same thing and maybe you are both correct and I am wrong, I don't know. I am just looking at the numbers. The are what, 12 scholarships/roster spots available for a team?Unless the NCAA suddenly decides to revoke the immediate eligibility rule it's 100% sustainable. There's always going to be kids looking play for one of the top teams in a top 3 basketball league
certainly. Nova cannot miss the NCAAT. If they do Neptune's seat will be more than hot, it will be on fire.
We all know how the high standards Husky fans, Kentucky, Duke, UNC, Kansas fans have. Just duplicate that in your mind for Nova because Nova fans have just as high of expectations. They are the only other BE school with championships to celebrate in recent memory so they expect top notch results.
For Minnesota and DePaul, sure. But Nova's fanbase is much larger and way more passionate than those fanbases. I guess my point is that, Nova fans have seen and tasted great success which means their tolerance will be at zero for any underachieving play. They were at wits end this past season.There would be pressure on Minnesota's or Depaul's coach to succeed if they brought in that kind of haul in the offseason. It is going to be off the chart at Villanova. Neptune has to deliver.
It's interesting, both you and Nelsonmuntz said the same thing and maybe you are both correct and I am wrong, I don't know. I am just looking at the numbers. The are what, 12 scholarships/roster spots available for a team?
Wouldn't you figure that the majority of them, meaning at least 7 of them would have to be "homegrown" recruiting from the high school ranks? I am not rhetorically asking this, I genuinely would like to know how you and others answer that question and what you think.
Can a school consistently recruit 7 or more transfers for a given season? I would think that would be very difficult. Maybe Nova and some other schools create a model for themselves were they get lackluster freshmen recruiting classes but become masters or specialize in recruiting the transfer portal.
13 scholarships, and I don't think bringing in 7 transfers a year is sustainable. But I don't think you have to, guys like Bamba and Ware they brought in have 2 years of eligibility. They'll still have to go after some freshman, but you can still build a successful culture around transfersIt's interesting, both you and Nelsonmuntz said the same thing and maybe you are both correct and I am wrong, I don't know. I am just looking at the numbers. The are what, 12 scholarships/roster spots available for a team?
Wouldn't you figure that the majority of them, meaning at least 7 of them would have to be "homegrown" recruiting from the high school ranks? I am not rhetorically asking this, I genuinely would like to know how you and others answer that question and what you think.
Can a school consistently recruit 7 or more transfers for a given season? I would think that would be very difficult. Maybe Nova and some other schools create a model for themselves were they get lackluster freshmen recruiting classes but become masters or specialize in recruiting the transfer portal.
They're going to be top 10 next season.What's going on at Creighton that they are losing all these guys? Looking for NIL $? Would have had a really good team if everyone stayed.
Arthur Kaluma to withdraw from NBA Draft, transfer from Creighton | Zagsblog
By SAM LANCE Former Creighton forward Arthur […]www.zagsblog.com